Perspectives on accessibility: From assistive technologies to universal access and design for All

The Universal Access Handbook

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 2-1-2-18

  Emiliani, Pier Luigi ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018060549     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Commission of the European Communities (2005). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. i2010: A European Information Society for Growth and Employment. Brussels.
2. Coutaz, J., Crowley, J. L., Dobson, S., and Garlan, D. (2005). Context is key. Communications ACM 48: 49-53.
3. Emiliani, P. L. (2001). Special needs and enabling technologies, in User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools (C. Stephanidis, ed.), pp. 97-114. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Emiliani, P. L. (2006). Assistive technology (AT) versus mainstream technology (MST): The research perspective. Technology and Disability Journal 18: 19-29.
5. European Commission (2002). eEurope 2005 Action Plan. http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/2002/news_library/documents/eeurope2005/eeurope2005_en.pdf.
6. Gill, J. (1996). Telecommunications: The Missing Links for People with Disabilities. COST 219, European Commission, Directorate General XIII, Telecommunications, Information Market and Exploration of Research.
7. IST Advisory Group (2003). Ambient Intelligence: From Vision to Reality. ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/ist/docs/istag-ist2003_consolidated_report.pdf.
8. Lewis, C. and Rieman, J. (1994). Task-Centred User Interface Design: A Practical Introduction. http://www.syd.dit.csiro. au/hci/clewis/contents.html.
9. Mynatt, E. D. and Weber, G. (1994). Nonvisual presentation of graphical user interfaces: Contrasting two approaches, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Celebrating Independence, 24-28 April, Boston, pp. 166-172. New York: ACM Press.
10. Savidis, A. and Stephanidis, C. (1998). The HOMER UIMS for dual user interface development: Fusing visual and nonvisual interactions. International Journal of Interacting with Computers 11: 173-209.
11. Stephanidis, C. (2001a). The concept of unified user interfaces, in User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools (C. Stephanidis, ed.), pp. 371-388. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Stephanidis, C. (2001b). User interfaces for all: New perspectives into human-computer interaction, in User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools (C. Stephanidis, ed.), pp. 3-17. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Stephanidis, C. (2003). Towards universal access in the disappearing computer environment. UPGRADE: The European Online Magazine for the IT Professional, Special Number on HCI (M. P. Díaz Pérez and G. Rossi, eds.), IV.
14. Stephanidis, C. and Emiliani, P. L. (1999). Connecting to the information society: A European perspective. Technology and Disability Journal 10: 21-44.
15. Stephanidis, C. and Mitsopoulos, Y. (1995). INTERACT: An interface builder facilitating access to users with disabilities. Proceedings of HCI International 2: 923-928.
16. Stephanidis, C., Paramythis, A., Sfyrakis, M., and Savidis, A. (2001). A case study in unified user interface development: The AVANTI web browser, in User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools (C. Stephanidis, ed.), pp. 525-568. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Stephanidis, C., Paramythis, A., Zarikas, V., and Savidis, A. (2004). The PALIO framework for adaptive information services, in Multiple User Interfaces: Cross-Platform Applications and Context-Aware Interfaces (A. Seffah and H. Javahery, eds.), pp. 69-92. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Akoumianakis, D., Arnold, A., Bevan, N., Dardailler, D., et al. (1999). Toward an information society for all: HCI challenges and R&D recommendations. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 11: 1-28.
19. Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Akoumianakis, D., Bevan, N., Brewer, J., Emiliani, P-L. et al. (1998). Toward an information society for all: An international R&D agenda. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 10: 107-134.
20. Stephanidis, C., Savidis, A., and Akoumianakis, D. (1995). Tools for user interfaces for all, in Proceedings of the 2nd TIDE Congress (I. Placencia-Porreiro and R. P. de la Bellacasa, eds.), 26-28 April, Paris, pp. 167-170. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
21. Trace Center (2008). General Concepts, Universal Design Principles and Guidelines. http://trace.wisc.edu/world/gen_ud.html.
22. U.S. Code (1998). The Rehabilitation Act Amendments (Section 508). http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/act.htm.
23. Vanderheiden, G. C. (1990). Thirty-something million: Should they be exceptions? Human Factors 32: 383-396.
24. Vanderheiden, G. C. (1998). Universal design and assistive technology in communication and information technologies: Alternatives or compliments? Assistive Technology 10: 29-36.
25. W3C-WAI. (1999). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. http://www.w3c.org/TR/WCAG10.
26. World Health Organization (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). http://www.who. int/classifications/icf/site/icftemplate.cfm.