Accuracy of self-collected human papillomavirus samples from Japanese women with abnormal cervical cytology

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 710-717

  Aiko, Kawano Yashiro ^a   Yoko, Motoki ^a,b   Saito, Oba Mari ^b   Ryoko, Asano ^a,b   Yasuyo, Maruyama ^a   Mikiko, Asai Sato ^a   Takeharu, Yamanaka ^b   Fumiki, Hirahara ^a,b   Etsuko, Miyagi ^a  

^a YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

cancer of the cervix; cytology and GYN pathology; human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLPOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FEMALE GENITAL TRACT MALFORMATION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; JAPANESE (PEOPLE); MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK FACTOR; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; VIRUS DETECTION; WART VIRUS; DEVICES; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; JAPAN; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE; PROCEDURES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARDS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINA SMEAR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85017592998     PISSN: 13418076     EISSN: 14470756     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jog.13258     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Cancer Preventive Strategies. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005.
2. Motoki Y, Mizushima S, Taguri M et al. Increasing trends in cervical cancer mortality among young Japanese women below the age of 50 years: An analysis using the Kanagawa population-based cancer registry, 1975-2012. Cancer Epidemiol 2015; 39: 700–706.
3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Comprehensive survey of living conditions 2015. [Cited 26 October 2015.] Available from URL: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-tyosa/k-tyosa13/ (in Japanese).
4. Ueda Y, Sobue T, Morimoto A et al. Evaluation of a free-coupon program for cervical cancer screening among the young: A nationally funded program conducted by a local government in Japan. J Epidemiol 2015; 25: 50–56.
5. Virtanen A, Anttila A, Luostarinen T, Nieminen P. Self-sampling versus reminder letter: Effects on cervical cancer screening attendance and coverage in Finland. Int J Cancer 2011; 128: 2681–2687.
6. Gök M, Heideman DA, van Kamenade FJ et al. HPV testing on self-collected cervicovaginal lavage specimens as screening method for women who do not attend cervical screening: Cohort study. BMJ 2010; 340: c1040.
7. Bais AG, van Kamenade FJ, Berkhof J et al. Human papillomavirus testing of self-sampled cervicovaginal brushes: An effective alternative to protect nonresponders in cervical screening programs. Int J Cancer 2007; 120: 1505–1510.
8. Broberg G, Gyrd-Hansen D, Jonason JM et al. Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: Offering a HPV self-test to long-term non-attendees as a part of RACOMIP, a Swedish randomized controlled trial. Int J Cancer 2013; 134: 2223–2230.
9. Bosgraaf R, Ketelaars P, Verhoef V et al. Reasons for non-attendance to cervical screening and preferences for HPV self-sampling in Dutch women. Prev Med 2014; 64c: 108–113.
10. Igidbashian S, Boveri S, Spolti N, Radice D, Sandri MT, Sideri M. Self-collected human papillomavirus testing acceptability: Comparison of two self-sampling modalities. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011; 20: 397–402.
11. Crofts V, Flahault E, Tebeu PM et al. Education efforts may contribute to wider acceptance of human papillomavirus self-sampling. Int J Womens Health 2015; 7: 149–154.
12. Hanley S, Fujita H, Yokoyama S et al. HPV self-sampling in Japanese women: A feasibility study in a population with limited experience of tampon use. J Med Screen 2016; 23: 164–170.
13. Arbyn M, Verdoodt F, Snijders P et al. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: A meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 172–183.
14. Baars R, Bosgraaf RP, Harmsel BWA, Melchers WJG, Quint WGV, Bekkers RLM. Dry storage and transport of a cervicovaginal self-sample by use of the Evalyn Brush, providing reliable human papillomavirus detection combined with comfort for women. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50: 3937.
15. Harper DM, Hildesheim A, Cobb JL, Greenberg M, Vaught J, Lorincz AT. Collection devices for human papillomavirus. J Fam Pract 1999; 48: 531–535.
16. McMenamin M, McKenna M. Stability of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical ThinPrep specimens previously lysed with glacial acetic acid. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2014; 122: 250–256.
17. Cabinet Office, Japan. Public opinion survey on cancer prevention measures 2015. [Cited 29 February 2015.] Available from URL: http://survey.gov-online.go.jp/h26/h26-gantaisaku/index.html (in Japanese).
18. Verhoef V, Bosgraaf RP, Kamenade FJ et al. Triage by methylation-marker testing versus cytology in women who test HPV-positive on self-collected cervicovaginal specimens (PROHTECT-3): A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 315–322.