Supply chain enterprise operations and government carbon tax decisions considering carbon emissions

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 152, Issue , 2017, Pages 271-280

  Wang, Chuanxu ^a   Wang, Wan ^a   Huang, Rongbing ^b  

^a SHANGHAI MARITIME UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Carbon tax; Stackelberg game; Stochastic demand; Supply chain

Indexed keywords

COSTS; DECISION MAKING; MANUFACTURE; PUBLIC POLICY; SALES; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TAXATION;

CARBON TAXES; CENTRALIZED DECISION MAKING; CENTRALIZED SUPPLY CHAINS; DECENTRALIZED SUPPLY CHAINS; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; OPERATIONAL DECISIONS; STACKELBERG GAMES; STOCHASTIC DEMAND;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

EID: 85017590522     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.051     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abdallah, T., Diabat, A., Simchi-Levi, D., A carbon sensitive supply chain network problem with green procurement. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2010, 1–6.
2. Abebe, G.K., Bijman, J., Kempa, R., Omta, O., Tsegaye, A., Contract farming configuration: small holders’ preferences for contract design attributes. Food Policy 40 (2013), 14–24.
3. Baranzini, A., Goldembergc, J., Speckd, S., A future for carbon taxes,. Ecol. Econ. 32:3 (2000), 395–412.
4. Choi, T.M., Carbon footprint tax on fashion supply chain systems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 68 (2013), 835–847.
5. Costantino, F., Gravio, G.D., Shaban, A., Tronci, M., The impact of information sharing on ordering policies to improve supply chain performances. Comput. Indus. Eng. 82 (2015), 127–142.
6. Deng, H., Farah, P.D., Wang, A., China's role and contribution in the global governance of climate change: institutional adjustments for carbon tax introduction, collection and management in China. J. World Energy Law Bus. 8:6 (2015), 581–599.
7. Du, S., Zhu, L., Liang, L., Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the ‘cap-and-trade's system. Energy Policy 57:6 (2013), 61–67.
8. Edirisinghe, N.C.P., Bichescu, B., Shi, X., Equilibrium analysis of supply chain structures under power imbalance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 214:3 (2011), 568–578.
9. Ghasemi, M., Ghavidel, S., Ghanbarian, M.M., Gharibzadeh, M., Vahed, A.A., Multi-objective optimal power flow considering the cost, emission, voltage deviation and power losses using multi-objective modified imperialist competitive algorithm. Energy 78 (2014), 276–289.
10. Ghosh, D., Shah, J., A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135:2 (2012), 568–583.
11. Glannoccaro, I., Pontrandolfo, P., Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 89:2 (2004), 131–139.
12. He, Y., Zhao, X., Coordination in multi-echelon supply chain under supply and demand uncertainly. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 139:1 (2012), 106–115.
13. Hesieh, C.C., Chang, Y.L., Wu, C.H., Competitive pricing and ordering decisions in a multiple-channel supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 154 (2014), 156–165.
14. Huang, H., Ke, H., Wang, L., Equilibrium analysis of pricing competition and cooperation in supply chain with one common manufacturer and duopoly retailers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 178 (2016), 12–21.
15. Jaber, M.Y., Glock, C.H., EI Saadany, A.M.A., Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51:1 (2013), 69–82.
16. Ji, J., Zhang, Z., Yang, L., Carbon emissions reduction decisions in the retail-/dual- channel supply chain with consumers’ preference. J. Clean. Prod. 141 (2017), 852–867.
17. Kim, K.K., Park, K.S., Transferring and sharing exchange-rate risk in a risk-averse supply chain of a multinational firm. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 237:2 (2014), 634–648.
18. Leng, M., Parlar, M., Allocation of cost savings in a three-level supply chain with demand information sharing: a cooperative-game approach. Oper. Res. 57:1 (2009), 200–213.
19. Li, J., Su, Q., Ma, L., Production and transportation outsourcing decisions in the supply chain under single and multiple carbon policies. J. Clean. Prod. 141 (2017), 1109–1122.
20. MacKenzie, D., Making things the same: gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Account. Organ. Soc. 34:3–4 (2009), 440–455.
21. Ni, D., Li, K.W., Tang, X., Social responsibility allocation in two-echelon supply chain: insights from wholesale price contracts. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207:3 (2010), 1269–1279.
22. Oreskes, N., Metaphors of warfare and the lessons of history: time to revisit a carbon tax?. Clim. Change 104:2 (2011), 223–230.
23. Özkır, V., Başlıgil, H., Multi-objective optimization of closed-loop supply chains in uncertain environment. J. Clean. Prod. 41 (2013), 114–125.
24. Petruzzi, N.C., Dada, M., Pricing and the newsvendor problem: a review with extensions. Oper. Res. 47:2 (1999), 183–194.
25. Sang, Shengju, Income distribution policy of supply chain cooperation game under fuzzy demand. J. UESTC Soc. Sci. Ed. 16:1 (2014), 39–44.
26. Song, J., Leng, M., Analysis of the Single-period Problem under Carbon Emissions Policies. 2012, Springer, New York, 297–313.
27. Tseng, S.C., Hung, S.W., A strategic decision-making model considering the social costs of carbon dioxide emissions for sustainable supply chain management. J. Environ. Manag. 133 (2014), 315–322.
28. Wang, K., Zhao, Y., Cheng, Y., Choi, T.M., Cooperation or Competition? Channel choice for a remanufacturing fashion supply chain with government subsidy. Sustainability 6:10 (2014), 7292–7310.
29. Xiao, B., Liu, L., Zhang, A., Two-stage supply chain coordination with asymmetric demand information. Control Decis. 5 (2004), 515–519.
30. Xue, W., Demirag, O.C., Niu, B., Supply chain performance and consumer surplus under alternative structure of channel dominance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239 (2014), 130–145.
31. Zhang, Z.X., Baranzini, A., What do we know about carbon taxes? An inquiry into their impacts on competitiveness and distribution of income. Energy Policy 32:4 (2004), 507–518.