Testing the utility of structure-from-motion photogrammetry reconstructions using small unmanned aerial vehicles and ground photography to estimate the extent of upland soil erosion

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Volumn 42, Issue 12, 2017, Pages 1860-1871

  Glendell, Miriam ^a,b   McShane, Gareth ^c   Farrow, Luke ^a   James, Mike R ^c   Quinton, John ^c   Anderson, Karen ^a   Evans, Martin ^d   Benaud, Pia ^a   Rawlins, Barry ^e   Morgan, David ^e   Jones, Lee ^e   Kirkham, Matthew ^e   DeBell, Leon ^d   Quine, Timothy A ^a   Lark, Murray ^e   Rickson, Jane ^f   Brazier, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^e BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United Kingdom)

^f CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

lightweight drones; SfM photogrammetry; soil erosion monitoring; terrestrial laser scanning; upland gully erosion

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; ANTENNAS; COPYRIGHTS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA HANDLING; EROSION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LANDFORMS; LASER APPLICATIONS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; REMOTE SENSING; REPAIR; SEEBECK EFFECT; SOIL TESTING; SOILS; STEEL BEAMS AND GIRDERS; SURFACE ANALYSIS; SURVEYS; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV);

DIGITAL SURFACE MODELS; GULLY EROSION; REMOTE SENSING APPROACHES; SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES; SOIL EROSION; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; STRUCTURE FROM MOTION; TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING;

SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS;

AIRCRAFT; EROSION RATE; GULLY EROSION; LASER METHOD; MONITORING; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; RECONSTRUCTION; REMOTE SENSING; SOIL EROSION; UNMANNED VEHICLE; UPLAND REGION;

EID: 85017573976     PISSN: 01979337     EISSN: 10969837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/esp.4142     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abdullah Q, Bethel J, Hussain M, Munjy R. 2013. Photogrammetric project and mission planning. In Manual of Photogrammetry, McGlone JC (ed). Americal Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: Bethesda, MD; 1187–1220.
2. Bemis SP, Micklethwaite S, Turner D, James MR, Akciz S, T. Thiele S, Bangash HA, Thiele ST, Bangash HA. 2014. Ground-based and UAV-Based photogrammetry: A multi-scale, high-resolution mapping tool for structural geology and paleoseismology. Journal of Structural Geology 69: 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2014.10.007
3. Besl P, McKay N. 1992. A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 14: 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.121791.
4. Bower MM. 1961. The distribution of erosion in blanket peat bogs in the Pennines. Transactions and Papers (Institute of British Geographers) 29: 17–30.
5. Brasington J, Langham J, Rumsby B. 2003. Methodological sensitivity of morphometric estimates of coarse fluvial sediment transport. Geomorphology 53: 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00320-3.
6. Brazier RE, Anderson K, Benaud P, Evans M, Farrow L, Glendell M, James M, Lark M, Quine T, Quinton J, Rawlins B, Rickson R. 2016. Final report to Defra – SP1311 – Developing a cost-effective framework to monitor soil erosion in England and Wales. Defra: York.
7. Castillo C, Pérez R, James MR, Quinton JN, Taguas EV, Gómez JA. 2012. Comparing the accuracy of several field methods for measuring gully erosion. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76: 1319. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2011.0390.
8. Carrera-Hernández JJ, Levresse G, Lacan P, Aranda-gómez JJ. 2016. A low cost technique for development of ultra-high resolution topography: application to a dry maar's bottom. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geologicas 33: 122–133.
9. Carrivick JL, Smith MW, Quincey DJ. 2016. Structure from Motion in Geosciences. New Analytical Methods in Earth and Environmental Science. WILEY-BLACKWELL.
10. Cazorzi F, Fontana GD, Luca A De, Sofia G, Tarolli P. 2013. Drainage network detection and assessment of network storage capacity in agrarian landscape. Hydrological Processes 27: 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9224
11. Chen Y, Media0no G. 1991. Object modeling by registration of multiple range images. Proceedings, 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2724–2729. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.1991.132043
12. Cranfield University. 2015. The Soils Guide. http://www.landis.org.uk [30 October 2015].
13. Cunliffe AM, Brazier RE, Anderson K. 2016. Ultra-fine grain landscape-scale quantification of dryland vegetation structure with drone-acquired structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Remote Sensing of Environment 183: 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.019.
14. Eltner A, Baumgart P, Maas H-G, Faust D. 2014. Multi-temporal UAV data for automatic measurement of rill and interrill erosion on loess soil. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 40(6): 741–755. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3673.
15. Evans M, Lindsay J. 2010a. High resolution quantification of gully erosion in upland peatlands at the landscape scale. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 35: 876–886. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1918.
16. Evans M, Lindsay J. 2010b. Impact of gully erosion on carbon sequestration in blanket peatlands. Climate Research 45: 31–41. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00887.
17. Evans M, Warburton J. 2007. Geomorphology of Upland Peat: Erosion, Form and Landscape Change. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford.
18. Frankl A, Stal C, Abraha A, Nyssen J, Rieke-Zapp D, De Wulf A, Poesen J. 2015. Detailed recording of gully morphology in 3D through image-based modelling. Catena 127: 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.12.016.
19. Gómez-Gutiérrez Á, Schnabel S, Berenguer-Sempere F, Lavado-Contador F, Rubio-Delgado J. 2014. Using 3D photo-reconstruction methods to estimate gully headcut erosion. Catena 120: 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.04.004.
20. Grand-Clement E, Anderson K, Smith D, Luscombe D, Gatis N, Ross M, Brazier RE. 2013. Evaluating ecosystem goods and services after restoration of marginal upland peatlands in south-west England. Journal of Applied Ecology 50: 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12039.
21. Gregory AS et al. 2015. A review of the impacts of degradation threats on soil properties in the UK. Soil Use and Management 31: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12212.
22. Hilley GE, Arrowsmith JR. 2008. Geomorphic response to uplift along the Dragon's Back pressure ridge, Carrizo Plain, California. Geology 36: 367–370. https://doi.org/10.1130/G24517A.1.
23. Hodgson ME, Bresnahan P. 2004. Accuracy of airborne Lidar-derived elevation: empirical assessment and error budget. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 70: 331–339. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.70.3.331.
24. Hugenholtz CH, Walker J, Brown O, Myshak S. 2015. Earthwork volumetrics with an unmanned aerial vehicle and softcopy photogrammetry. Journal of Surveying Engineering 141. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000138.
25. Hugenholtz CH, Whitehead K, Brown OW, Barchyn TE, Moorman BJ, LeClair A, Riddell K, Hamilton T. 2013. Geomorphological mapping with a small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS): feature detection and accuracy assessment of a photogrammetrically-derived digital terrain model. Geomorphology 194: 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.03.023.
26. Jaboyedoff M, Oppikofer T, Abellan A, Derron M-H, Loye A, Metzger R, Pedrazzini A. 2012. Use of LIDAR in landslide investigations: a review. Natural Hazards 61: 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9634-2.
27. James MR, Pinkerton H, Applegarth LJ. 2009. Detecting the development of active lava flow fields with a very-long-range terrestrial laser scanner and thermal imagery. Geophysical Research Letters 36: 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040701.
28. James MR, Quinton JN. 2014. Ultra-rapid topographic surveying for complex environments: the hand-held mobile laser scanner (HMLS). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 39: 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3489.
29. James MR, Robson S. 2012. Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: accuracy and geoscience application. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 117: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002289.
30. James MR, Robson S, d'Oleire-Oltmanns S, Niethammer U. 2017. Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment. Geomorphology 280: 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.021.
31. Javernick L, Brasington J, Caruso B. 2014. Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Geomorphology 213: 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.01.006.
32. Johnson K, Nissen E, Saripalli S, Arrowsmith JR, McGarey P, Scharer K, Williams P, Blisniuk K. 2014. Rapid mapping of ultrafine fault zone topography with structure from motion. Geosphere 10: 969–986. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01017.1.
33. Kereszturi G, Procter J, Cronin SJ, Nemeth K, Bebbington M, Lindsay J. 2012. LiDAR-based quantification of lava flow susceptibility in the City of Auckland (New Zealand). Remote Sensing of Environment 125: 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.07.015.
34. Lane SN, Westaway RM, Hicks DM. 2003. Estimation of erosion and deposition volumes in a large, gravel-bed, braided river using synoptic remote sensing. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28: 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.483.
35. Legleiter CJ. 2012. Remote measurement of river morphology via fusion of LiDAR topography and spectrally based bathymetry. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 37: 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.2262.
36. Lucieer A, Jong SMD, Turner D. 2014. Mapping landslide displacements using structure from motion (SfM) and image correlation of multi-temporal UAV photography. Progress in Physical Geography 38: 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133313515293.
37. Martínez-Casasnovas JA. 2003. A spatial information technology approach for the mapping and quantification of gully erosion. Catena 50: 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(02)00134-0.
38. McHugh M. 2007. Short-term changes in upland soil erosion in England and Wales: 1999 to 2002. Geomorphology 86: 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.010.
39. Nouwakpo SK, Weltz MA, McGwire K. 2016. Assessing the performance of structure-from-motion photogrammetry and terrestrial LiDAR for reconstructing soil surface microtopography of naturally vegetated plots. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 41: 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3787.
40. Ouédraogo MM, Degré A, Debouche C, Lisein J. 2014. The evaluation of unmanned aerial system-based photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning to generate DEMs of agricultural watersheds. Geomorphology 214: 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.02.016.
41. Passalacqua P et al. 2015. Analyzing high resolution topography for advancing the understanding of mass and energy transfer through landscapes: a review. Earth-Science Reviews 148: 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.05.012.
42. Passalacqua P, Tarolli P, Foufoula-Georgiou E. 2010. Testing space-scale methodologies for automatic geomorphic feature extraction from lidar in a complex mountainous landscape. Water Resources Research 46: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008812.
43. Reitman NG, Bennett SEK, Gold RD, Briggs RW, DuRoss CB. 2015. High-resolution trench photomosaics from Image-Based modeling: Workflow and error analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 105: 2354–2366.
44. Smith MW, Carrivick JL, Hooke J, Kirkby MJ. 2014. Reconstructing flash flood magnitudes using “Structure-from-Motion”: a rapid assessment tool. Journal of Hydrology 519: 1914–1927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.078.
45. Smith MW, Carrivick JL, Quincey DJ. 2016. Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography 40(2): 247–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133315615805.
46. Smith MW, Vericat D. 2015. From experimental plots to experimental landscapes: topography, erosion and deposition in sub-humid badlands from structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 40: 1656–1671. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3747.
47. Snapir B, Hobbs S, Waine TW. 2014. Roughness measurements over an agricultural soil surface with structure from motion. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 96: 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.07.010.
48. Sofia G, Fontana GD, Tarolli P. 2014. High-resolution topography and anthropogenic feature extraction: testing geomorphometric parameters in floodplains. Hydrological Processes 28: 2046–2061. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9727.
49. Sofia G, Tarolli P, Cazorzi F, Dalla FG. 2011. An objective approach for feature extraction: distribution analysis and statistical descriptors for scale choice and channel network identification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15: 1387–1402. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1387-2011.
50. Stumpf A, Malet J-P, Allemand P, Pierrot-Deseilligny M, Skupinski G. 2015. Ground-based multi-view photogrammetry for the monitoring of landslide deformation and erosion. Geomorphology 231: 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.10.039.
51. Tarolli P. 2014. High-resolution topography for understanding Earth surface processes: opportunities and challenges. Geomorphology 216: 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.03.008.
52. Tonkin TN, Midgley NG, Graham DJ, Labadz JC. 2014. The potential of small unmanned aircraft systems and structure-from-motion for topographic surveys: a test of emerging integrated approaches at Cwm Idwal, North Wales. Geomorphology 226: 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.07.021.
53. Toth C, Brzezinska D, Csanyi N, Paska E, Yastikli N. 2007. LiDaR mapping supporting earthquake research of the San Andreas fault. Proceedings, ASPRS 2007 Annual Conference, Tampa, Florida; 1–11.
54. Turner D, Lucieer A, de Jong S. 2015. Time series analysis of landslide dynamics using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Remote Sensing 7: 1736–1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70201736.
55. Verheijen FGA, Jones RJA, Rickson RJ, Smith CJ, Bastos AC, Nunes JP, Keizer JJ. 2012. Concise overview of European soil erosion research and evaluation. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica: Section B, Soil & Plant Science 62: 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2012.697573.
56. Warburton J, Evans MG, Johnson RM. 2003. Discussion on ‘The extent of soil erosion in Upland England and Wales. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28: 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.477.
57. Westoby MJ, Brasington J, Glasser NF, Hambrey MJ, Reynolds JM. 2012. ‘Structure-from-Motion‘ photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 179: 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021.
58. Williams RD, Brasington J, Vericat D, Hicks DM. 2014. Hyperscale terrain modelling of braided rivers: fusing mobile terrestrial laser scanning and optical bathymetric mapping. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 39: 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3437.
59. Williams RD, Rennie CD, Brasington J, Hicks DM, Vericat D. 2015. Linking the spatial distribution of bed load transport to morphological change during high-flow events in a shallow braided river. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 120(3): 604–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003346.
60. Woodget AS, Carbonneau PE, Visser F, Maddock IP. 2015. Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 40: 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3613.