The seven deadly sins of cloud computing research

4th USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing, HotCloud 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Schwarzkopf, Malte ^a   Murray, Derek G ^b   Hand, Steven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SCIENCE;

DISTRIBUTED PARALLELISM; REAL PROBLEMS; RESEARCH AGENDA;

CLOUD COMPUTING;

EID: 85017487069     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. ABOUZEID, A., ET AL. HadoopDB: An architectural hybrid of MapReduce and DBMS technologies for analytical workloads. Proc. VLDB Endowment 2, 1 (2009), 922-933.
2. ANANTHANARAYANAN, G., ET AL. Reining in the outliers in map-reduce clusters using Mantri. In Proc. OSDI 2010 (2010).
3. ANANTHANARAYANAN, G., ET AL. Disk-Locality in Datacenter Computing Considered Irrelevant. In Proc. HotOS (2011), p. 1.
4. ANANTHANARAYANAN, G., ET AL. Scarlett: coping with skewed content popularity in mapreduce clusters. In Proc. EuroSys (2011), pp. 287-300.
5. ARMBRUST, M., FOX, A., ET AL. Above the clouds: a Berkeley view of cloud computing. Tech. rep., UC Berkeley, 2009.
6. BORKAR, V., ET AL. Hyracks: A flexible and extensible foundation for data-intensive computing. In Proc. ICDE (2011), pp. 1151-1162.
7. BU, Y., ET AL. HaLoop: Efficient iterative data processing on large clusters. Proc. VLDB Endowment 3, 1-2 (2010), 285-296.
8. CHAMBERS, C., ET AL. FlumeJava: Easy, efficient data-parallel pipelines. In Proc. PLDI (2010), pp. 363-375.
9. CHOWDHURY, M., ET AL. Managing data transfers in computer clusters with Orchestra. In Proc. SIGCOMM (2011), p. 98.
10. CONDIE, T., ET AL. MapReduce online. In Proc. NSDI (2010), pp. 21-21.
11. DEAN, J., ET AL. MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. In Proc. OSDI (2004), p. 10.
12. DITTRICH, J., ET AL. Hadoop++: Making a yellow elephant run like a cheetah (without it even noticing). In Proc. VLDB (2010).
13. EKANAYAKE, J., ET AL. Twister: a runtime for iterative mapreduce. In Proc. HPDC (2010), pp. 810-818.
14. ELNIKETY, E., ET AL. iHadoop: asynchronous iterations for MapReduce. In Proc. CloudCom (2011), pp. 81-90.
15. FETTERLY, D., ET AL. TidyFS: a simple and small distributed filesystem. In Proc. USENIX ATC (2011).
16. GU, Y., ET AL. Sector and Sphere: the design and implementation of a high-performance data cloud. Phil. trans. A, Math., phys., eng. sciences 367, 1897 (2009), 2429-45.
17. HE, B., ET AL. Comet: batched stream processing for data intensive distributed computing. In Proc. SoCC (2010), pp. 63-74.
18. HINDMAN, B., ET AL. Mesos: A platform for fine-grained resource sharing in the data center. In Proc. NSDI (2011).
19. ISARD, M., ET AL. Dryad: distributed data-parallel programs-from sequential building blocks. SIGOPS OSR 41, 3 (2007), 59.
20. ISARD, M., ET AL. Quincy: fair scheduling for distributed computing clusters. In Proc. SOSP (2009), pp. 261-276.
21. KAVULYA, S., ET AL. An Analysis of Traces from a Production MapReduce Cluster. In Proc. CCGRID (2010), pp. 94-103.
22. KUZ, I., ET AL. Multicore OS benchmarks: we can do better. Proc. HotOS (2011).
23. LI, A., ET AL. CloudCmp: comparing public cloud providers. In Proc. IMC (2010), pp. 1-14.
24. LIU, H., ET AL. Cloud MapReduce: A MapReduce Implementation on Top of a Cloud Operating System. In Proc. CCGRID (2011), pp. 464-474.
25. LOW, Y., ET AL. Distributed GraphLab: a framework for machine learning and data mining in the cloud. Proc. VLDB Endow. 5, 8 (2012), 716-727.
26. MALEWICZ, G., ET AL. Pregel: a system for large-scale graph processing. In Proc. SIGMOD (2010), pp. 135-146.
27. MISHRA, A., ET AL. Towards characterizing cloud backend workloads: insights from Google compute clusters. SIGMETRICS Perf. Eval. Review 37, 4 (2010), 34-41.
28. MURRAY, D. G. A distributed execution engine supporting data-dependent control flow. PhD thesis, Univ. of Cambridge, 2011.
29. MURRAY, D. G., ET AL. CIEL: a universal execution engine for distributed data-flow computing. In Proc. NSDI (2011).
30. NAGLE, D., ET AL. The Panasas ActiveScale storage cluster: Delivering scalable high bandwidth storage. In Proc. SC (2004).
31. OLSTON, C., ET AL. Pig Latin: a not-so-foreign language for data processing. In Proc. SIGMOD (2008), pp. 1099-1110.
32. OLSTON, C., ET AL. Nova: continuous Pig/Hadoop workflows. In Proc. SIGMOD (2011).
33. PAVLO, A., ET AL. A comparison of approaches to large-scale data analysis. In Proc. SIGMOD (2009), pp. 165-178.
34. POWER, R., ET AL. Piccolo: building fast, distributed programs with partitioned tables. In Proc. OSDI (2010).
35. REISS, C., ET AL. Characterizing a large, heterogeneous cluster trace. Tech. rep., Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh,, 2012.
36. ROWSTRON, A., ET AL. Nobody ever got fired for using Hadoop. In Proc. HotCDP (2012).
37. SCHAD, J., ET AL. Runtime measurements in the cloud: observing, analyzing, and reducing variance. Proc. VLDB Endowment 3, 1-2 (2010), 460-471.
38. SHARMA, B., ET AL. Modeling and synthesizing task placement constraints in Google compute clusters. Proc. SoCC (2011).
39. SHVACHKO, K., ET AL. The Hadoop distributed file system. In Proc. IEEE MSST (2010), pp. 1-10.
40. THUSOO, A., ET AL. Hive - a petabyte scale data warehouse using Hadoop. In Proc. ICDE (2010), pp. 996-1005.
41. ZAHARIA, M., ET AL. Improving MapReduce performance in heterogeneous environments. In Proc. OSDI (2008), pp. 29-42.
42. ZAHARIA, M., ET AL. Delay scheduling: A simple technique for achieving locality and fairness in cluster scheduling. In Proc. EuroSys (2010), pp. 265-278.
43. ZAHARIA, M., ET AL. Spark: Cluster computing with working sets. In Proc. HotCloud (2010), p. 10.
44. ZHANG, Y., ET AL. iMapReduce: A Distributed Computing Framework for Iterative Computation. In Proc. IPDPS (2011).
45. ZHANG, Y., ET AL. PrIter: a distributed framework for prioritized iterative computations. In Proc. SOCC (2011), ACM, p. 13.