Evaluation of enhanced recovery for elective cesarean section;Évaluation de la mise en place d'un protocole de réhabilitation précoce postcésarienne

Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite et Senologie

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 202-209

  Cattin, A ^a,b   De Baene, A ^a,b   Achon, E ^a,b   Bersot, Y ^a,b   Destoop, Q ^a,b   Pelissier, A ^a,b   Bonneau, S ^a,b   Malinovsky, J M ^a,b   Graesslin, O ^a,b   Raimond, E ^a,b  

^a HÔPITAL MAISON BLANCHE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE REIMS CHAMPAGNE ARDENNE   (France)

Author keywords

Cesarean; Enhanced recovery

Indexed keywords

DEXAMETHASONE; DROPERIDOL;

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; CATHETER REMOVAL; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; EARLY INTERVENTION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EMERGENCY SURGERY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS CATHETER; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL HISTORY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OBSTETRIC PATIENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REHABILITATION CARE; URINARY CATHETER; ANALGESIA; EVALUATION STUDY; NAUSEA; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; REHABILITATION; VOMITING;

CESAREAN SECTION; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; NAUSEA; PAIN MANAGEMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VOMITING;

EID: 85017433939     PISSN: 24687197     EISSN: 24687189     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. [1] Kehlet, H., Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:5 (1997), 606–617.
2. [2] Ministère de la Santé, Enquête nationale périnatale_2010. Report [Internet]., 2010 [Available from: http://www.sante.gouv.fr/enquete-nationale-perinatale-2010.html].
3. [3] Dyer, R.A., Farina, Z., Joubert, I.A., Du Toit, P., Meyer, M., Torr, G., et al. Crystalloid preload versus rapid crystalloid administration after induction of spinal anaesthesia (coload) for elective caesarean section. Anaesth Intensive Care 32:3 (2004), 351–357.
4. [4] Pizzagalli, F., Agasse, J., Marpeau, L., Carbetocin versus oxytocin during caesarean section for preventing postpartum haemorrhage. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 43:5 (2015), 356–360.
5. [5] Conférence d'experts SFAR, Prise en charge des nausées et vomissements postopératoires. 2007.
6. [6] Comité douleur-anesthésie locorégionale et le comité des référentiels de la Sfar. Recommandations formalisées d'experts 2008, Prise en charge de la douleur postopératoire chez l'adulte et l'enfant. 2008.
7. [7] Angle, P.J., Halpern, S.H., Leighton, B.L., Szalai, J.P., Gnanendran, K., Kronberg, J.E., A randomized controlled trial examining the effect of naproxen on analgesia during the second day after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 95:3 (2002), 741–745 [table of contents].
8. [8] Li, L., Wen, J., Wang, L., Li, Y.P., Li, Y., Is routine indwelling catheterisation of the bladder for caesarean section necessary? A systematic review. BJOG 118:4 (2011), 400–409.
9. [9] Huang, H., Wang, H., He, M., Early oral feeding compared with delayed oral feeding after cesarean section: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 29:3 (2016), 423–429.
10. [10] Wyniecki, A., Raucoules-Aimé, M., de Montblanc, J., Benhamou, D., Réhabilitation précoce après césarienne programmée : enquête de pratique auprès des maternités des régions Provence - Alpes - Côte d'Azur et Île-de-France. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 32:3 (2013), 149–156.
11. [11] Jacques, V., Vial, F., Lerintiu, M., Thilly, N., Mc Nelis, U., Raft, J., et al. Réhabilitation périopératoire des césariennes programmées non compliquées en France : enquête de pratique nationale. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 32:3 (2013), 142–148.
12. [12] Infections urinaires nosocomiales de l'adulte. Conférence de consensus co-organisée par la Société de pathologie infectieuse de langue française (SPILF) et l'Association française d'urologie (AFU). 2002 [Available from: http://www.infectiologie.com/site/medias/_documents/consensus/iun-02.pdf].
13. [13] Ghoreishi, J., Indwelling urinary catheters in cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 83:3 (2003), 267–270.
14. [14] Soriano, D., Dulitzki, M., Keidar, N., Barkai, G., Mashiach, S., Seidman, D.S., Early oral feeding after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 87:6 (1996), 1006–1008.
15. [15] Kramer, R.L., Van Someren, J.K., Qualls, C.R., Curet, L.B., Postoperative management of cesarean patients: the effect of immediate feeding on the incidence of ileus. Obstet Gynecol 88:1 (1996), 29–32.
16. [16] Jalilian, N., Ghadami, M.R., Randomized clinical trial comparing postoperative outcomes of early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40:6 (2014), 1649–1652.
17. [17] Engstrøm, T., Barth, T., Melin, P., Vilhardt, H., Oxytocin receptor binding and uterotonic activity of carbetocin and its metabolites following enzymatic degradation. Eur J Pharmacol 355:2–3 (1998), 203–210.
18. [18] Mockler, J.C., Murphy, D.J., Wallace, E.M., An Australian and New Zealand survey of practice of the use of oxytocin at elective caesarean section. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 50:1 (2010), 30–35.
19. [19] Murphy, D.J., MacGregor, H., Munishankar, B., McLeod, G., A randomised controlled trial of oxytocin 5IU and placebo infusion versus oxytocin 5IU and 30IU infusion for the control of blood loss at elective caesarean section–pilot study. ISRCTN 40302163. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 142:1 (2009), 30–33.
20. [20] Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation. Prévention de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse périopératoire et obstétricale Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Texte court 2005. 2005.
21. [21] Wrench, I.J., Allison, A., Galimberti, A., Radley, S., Wilson, M.J., Introduction of enhanced recovery for elective caesarean section enabling next day discharge: a tertiary centre experience. Int J Obstet Anesth 24:2 (2015), 124–130.