Two-year clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergoing descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Cornea

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 655-660

  Peraza Nieves, Jorge ^a   Baydoun, Lamis ^a   Dapena, Isabel ^a   Ilyas, Abbas ^a   Frank, Laurence E ^a   Luceri, Salvatore ^a   Ham, Lisanne ^a   Oellerich, Silke ^a   Melles, Gerrit R J ^a  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATIVE OCULAR SURGERY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Central corneal thickness; Corneal transplantation; DMEK; Endothelial cell density; Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy; Visual acuity

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BEST CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY; CELL DENSITY; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; CENTRAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL DENSITY; CLINICAL OUTCOME; CONGENITAL CORNEA DYSTROPHY; CORNEA TRANSPLANTATION; DESCEMET MEMBRANE ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; GRAFT DETACHMENT; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT PRESERVATION; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KERATOPATHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTICAL DENSITY; PACHYMETRY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETRANSPLANTATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPECULAR MICROSCOPY; SURFACE AREA; CELL COUNT; CORNEA ENDOTHELIUM; CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS; CORNEAL PACHYMETRY; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; FOLLOW UP; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

AGED; CELL COUNT; CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS; CORNEAL PACHYMETRY; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; ENDOTHELIUM, CORNEAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FUCHS' ENDOTHELIAL DYSTROPHY; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 85017419308     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001176     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Melles GR. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. Cornea. 2006;25:879-881.
2. Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea. 2006;25:987-990.
3. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2006;25:886-889.
4. Price MO, Gorovoy M, Benetz BA, et al. Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty outcomes compared with penetrating keratoplasty from the Cornea Donor Study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:438-444.
5. Park CY, Lee JK, Gore PK, et al. Keratoplasty in the United States: A 10-year review from 2005 through 2014. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:2432-2442.
6. Heinzelmann S, Böhringer D, Eberwein P, et al. Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254:515-522.
7. Schoenberg ED, Price FW Jr, Miller J, et al. Refractive outcomes of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty triple procedures (combined with cataract surgery). J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1182-1189.
8. Goldich Y, Showail M, Avni-Zauberman N, et al. Contralateral eye comparison of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159: 155-159.
9. PriceMO, Scanameo A, FengMT, et al. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: risk of immunologic rejection episodes after discontinuing topical corticosteroids. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1232-1236.
10. Dirisamer M, Ham L, Dapena I, et al. Efficacy of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcome of 200 consecutive cases after a learning curve of 25 cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:1435-1443.
11. Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, et al. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2368-2373.
12. Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora M, Quilendrino R, Ham L, et al. Clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergoing Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:464-470.
13. Ham L, Dapena I, van Luijk CM, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: review of the first 50 consecutive cases. Eye. 2009;23:1990-1998.
14. Groeneveld-van Beek EA, Lie JT, van der Wees J, et al. Standardized 'no-touch' donor tissue preparation for DALK and DMEK: harvesting undamaged anterior and posterior transplants from the same donor cornea. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:145-150.
15. Lie JT, Birbal R, Ham L, et al. Donor tissue preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34: 1578-1583.
16. Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K, et al. Standardized "no-touch" technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:88-94.
17. Liarakos VS, Dapena I, Ham L, et al. Intraocular graft unfolding techniques in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131:29-35.
18. Laird NM, Ware JH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982;38:963-974.
19. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 1995;57:289-300.
20. Li JY, Terry MA, Goshe J, et al. Three-year visual acuity outcomes after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1126-1129.
21. Wacker K, Baratz KH, Maguire LJ, et al. Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy: five-year results of a prospective study. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:154-160.
22. Busin M, Madi S, Santorum P, et al. Ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome doublepass technique: two-year outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2013;120: 1186-1194.
23. Tourtas T, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:1082-1090.
24. Shimizu T, Yamaguchi T, Satake Y, et al. Topographic hot spot before Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty is associated with postoperative hyperopic shift. Cornea. 2015;34:257-263.
25. Rodríguez-Calvo de Mora M, Groeneveld-van Beek EA, Frank LE, et al. Association between graft storage time and donor age with endothelial cell density and graft adherence after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:91-94.
26. Feng MT, Price MO, Miller JM, et al. Air reinjection and endothelial cell density in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: five-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1116-1121.
27. Schlögl A, Tourtas T, Kruse FE, et al. Long-term clinical outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 169:218-226.
28. Price MO, Fairchild KM, Price DA, et al. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:725-729.
29. Lass JH, Gal RL, Dontchev M, et al. Donor age and corneal endothelial cell loss 5 years after successful corneal transplantation. Specular microscopy ancillary study results. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:627-632.
30. Baydoun L, Ham L, Borderie V, et al. Endothelial survival after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: effect of surgical indication and graft adherence status. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133: 1277-1278.
31. Ham L, Dapena I, Liarakos VS, et al. Mid-term results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): 4 to 7 years clinical outcome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;171:113-121.