Is waveform worth it? A comparison of LiDAR approaches for vegetation and landscape characterization

Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 5-15

  Anderson, Karen ^a   Hancock, Steven ^a   Disney, Mathias ^b   Gaston, Kevin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

LiDAR; structure; urban; validation; vegetation; waveform

Indexed keywords

EID: 85017388982     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20563485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rse2.8     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alonzo, M., B. Bookhagen, and D. A. Roberts. 2014. Urban tree species mapping using hyperspectral and lidar data fusion. Remote Sens. Environ. 148, 70–83.
2. Anderson, J., M. E. Martin, M. L. Smith, R. O. Dubayah, M. A. Hofton, P. Hyde, et al. 2006. The use of waveform lidar to measure northern temperate mixed conifer and deciduous forest structure in New Hampshire. Remote Sens. Environ. 105, 248–261.
3. Anderson, K., J. Bennie, and A. Wetherelt. 2010. Laser scanning of fine scale pattern along a hydrological gradient in a peatland ecosystem. Landscape Ecol. 25, 477–492.
4. Antonarakis, A. S., K. S. Richards, and J. Brasington. 2008. Object-based land cover classification using airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 2988–2998.
5. Armston, J., M. Disney, P. Lewis, P. Scarth, S. Phinn, R. Lucas, et al. 2013. Direct retrieval of canopy gap probability using airborne waveform lidar. Remote Sens. Environ. 134, 24–38.
6. Ashcroft, M. B., J. R. Gollan, and D. Ramp. 2014. Creating vegetation density profiles for a diverse range of ecological habitats using terrestrial laser scanning. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 263–272.
7. Asner, G. P., R. F. Hughes, J. Mascaro, A. L. Uowolo, D. E. Knapp, J. Jacobson, et al. 2011. High-resolution carbon mapping on the million-hectare Island of Hawaii. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 434–439.
8. ASPRS. 2015. LASer (LAS) File Format Exchange Activities – what is the LAS format? Available at http://www.asprs.org/Committee-General/LASer-LAS-File-Format-Exchange-Activities.html (accessed 3 March 2015) [Online].
9. Boudreau, J., R. F. Nelson, H. A. Margolis, A. Beaudoin, L. Guindon, and D. S. Kimes. 2008. Regional aboveground forest biomass using airborne and spaceborne LiDAR in Quebec. Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A. 23, 387–397.
10. Bunting, P., J. Armston, R. M. Lucas, and D. Clewley. 2013. Sorted pulse data (SPD) library. Part I: a generic file format for LiDAR data from pulsed laser systems in terrestrial environments. Comput. Geosci. 56, 197–206.
11. Calders, K., G. Newnham, A. Burt, S. Murphy, P. Raumonen, M. Herold, et al. 2015. Nondestructive estimates of above-ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 198–208.
12. Chen, Z., B. Xu, and B. Devereux. 2014. Urban landscape pattern analysis based on 3D landscape models. Appl. Geogr. 55, 82–91.
13. Danson, F. M., R. Gaulton, R. P. Armitage, M. Disney, O. Gunawan, P. Lewis, et al. 2014. Developing a dual-wavelength full-waveform terrestrial laser scanner to characterize forest canopy structure. Agric. For. Meteorol. 198, 7–14.
14. Decocq, G., M. Aubert, F. Dupont, D. Alard, R. Saguez, A. Wattez-Franger, et al. 2004. Plant diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest: understorey response to two silvicultural systems. J. Appl. Ecol. 41, 1065–1079.
15. Disney, M., V. Kalogirou, P. Lewis, A. Prieto-Blanco, S. Hancock, and M. Pfeifer. 2010. Simulating the impact of discrete-return lidar system and survey characteristics over young conifer and broadleaf forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 114, 1546–1560.
16. Donoghue, D. N. M., P. J. Watt, N. J. Cox, and J. Wilson. 2007. Remote sensing of species mixtures in conifer plantations using LiDAR height and intensity data. Remote Sens. Environ. 110, 509–522.
17. Drake, J. B., R. O. Dubayah, D. B. Clark, R. G. Knox, J. B. Blair, M. A. Hofton, et al. 2002. Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar. Remote Sens. Environ. 79, 305–319.
18. Gaston, K. J., M. L. Ávila-Jiménez, and J. L. Edmondson. 2013. REVIEW: managing urban ecosystems for goods and services. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 830–840.
19. Gaveau, D. L. A., and R. A. Hill. 2003. Quantifying canopy height underestimation by laser pulse penetration in small-footprint airborne laser scanning data. Can. J. Remote Sens. 29, 650–657.
20. Hancock, S., P. Lewis, M. Disney, M. Foster, and J. P. Muller. 2008. Assessing the accuracy of forest height estimation with long pulse waveform lidar through Monte-Carlo ray tracing. Proc. SilviLaser 2008, Sept. 17–19, Edinburgh, U.K.: 199–206, Available at online http://geography.swan.ac.uk/silvilaser/papers/oral_papers/Waveform%20LiDAR/Hancock.pdf (accessed 4 November 2015) [Online].
21. Hancock, S., M. Disney, J.-P. Muller, P. Lewis, and M. Foster. 2011. A threshold insensitive method for locating the forest canopy top with waveform lidar. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 3286–3297.
22. Hancock, S., J. Armston, Z. Li, R. Gaulton, P. Lewis, M. DIsney, et al. 2015. Waveform lidar over vegetation: an evaluation of inversion methods for estimating return energy. Remote Sens. Environ. 164, 208–224.
23. Harding, D. J., and C. C. Carabajal. 2005. ICESat waveform measurements of within-footprint topographic relief and vegetation vertical structure. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L21S10. doi: 10.1029/2005GL023471.
24. Hilker, T., M. van Leeuwen, N. C. Coops, M. A. Wulder, G. J. Newnham, D. L. B. Jupp, et al. 2010. Comparing canopy metrics derived from terrestrial and airborne laser scanning in a Douglas-fir dominated forest stand. Trees-Struct. Funct. 24, 819–832.
25. Hill, R., and R. K. Broughton. 2009. Mapping the understorey of deciduous woodland from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne LiDAR data: a case study in lowland Britain. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 64, 223–233.
26. Hofton, M. A., J. B. Minster, and J. B. Blair. 2000. Decomposition of laser altimeter waveforms. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 38, 1989–1996.
27. Hosoi, F., Y. Nakai, and K. Omasa. 2013. 3-D voxel-based solid modeling of a broad-leaved tree for accurate volume estimation using portable scanning lidar. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 82, 41–48.
28. Hyde, P., R. Dubayah, B. Peterson, J. B. Blair, M. Hofton, C. Hunsaker, et al. 2005. Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using waveform lidar: validation of montane ecosystems. Remote Sens. Environ. 96, 427–437.
29. Hyde, P., R. Dubayah, W. Walker, J. B. Blair, M. Hofton, and C. Hunsaker. 2006. Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM plus, Quickbird) synergy. Remote Sens. Environ. 102, 63–73.
30. Jiaying, W., J. A. N. van Aardt, and G. P. Asner. 2011. A Comparison of Signal Deconvolution Algorithms Based on Small-Footprint LiDAR Waveform Simulation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 49, 2402–2414.
31. Jones, D. K., M. E. Baker, A. J. Miller, S. T. Jarnagin, and D. M. Hogan. 2014. Tracking geomorphic signatures of watershed suburbanization with multitemporal LiDAR. Geomorphology 219, 42–52.
32. Jules, E. S., and P. Shahani. 2003. A broader ecological context to habitat fragmentation: why matrix habitat is more important than we thought. J. Veg. Sci. 14, 459–464.
33. Krainak, M. A., J. B. Abshire, J. Camp, J. R. Chen, B. Coyle, S. X. Li, et al. 2012. Laser transceivers for future NASA missions. Proc. SPIE 8381, Laser Technology for Defense and Security VIII, 83810Y. doi: 10.1117/12.920783.
34. Lefsky, M. A., W. B. Cohen, G. G. Parker, and D. J. Harding. 2002. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. Bioscience 52, 19–30.
35. Lefsky, M. A., D. J. Harding, M. Keller, W. B. Cohen, C. C. Carabajal, F. D. Espirito-Santo, et al. 2005. Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L22S02. doi: 10.1029/2005GL023971.
36. Lindberg, E., K. Olofsson, J. Holmgren, and H. Olsson. 2012. Estimation of 3D vegetation structure from waveform and discrete return airborne laser scanning data. Remote Sens. Environ. 118, 151–161.
37. Luscombe, D. J., K. Anderson, N. Gatis, A. Wetherelt, E. Grand-Clement, and R. E. Brazier. 2014. What does airborne LiDAR really measure in upland ecosystems? Ecohydrology 8, 584–594.
38. Mallet, C., and F. Bretar. 2009. Full-waveform topographic lidar: state-of-the-art. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 64, 1–16.
39. NASA. 2014. New NASA Probe Will Study Earth's Forests in 3-D (8 September 2014) Available at http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/new-nasa-probe-will-study-earth-s-forests-in-3-d/ (accessed 7 April 2015) [Online].
40. NERC ARSF. 2014a. Processing report: RG12/10, flight day 249/2012, Luton Available at http://arsf-dan.nerc.ac.uk/trac/ticket/463 (accessed 7 April 2015) [Online].
41. NERC ARSF. 2014b. Processing report: RG12/10, flight day 250/2012, Luton Bedford Available at https://arsf-dan.nerc.ac.uk/trac/ticket/457 (accessed 7 April 2015) [Online].
42. Podobnikar, T., and A. Vrecko. 2012. Digital Elevation Model from the Best Results of Different Filtering of a LiDAR Point Cloud. T. Gis 16, 603–617.
43. Roncat, A., G. Bergauer, and N. Pfeifer. 2011. B-spline deconvolution for differential target cross-section determination in full-waveform laser scanning data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 66, 418–428.
44. Shugart, H. H., S. Saatchi, and F. G. Hall. 2010. Importance of structure and its measurement in quantifying function of forest ecosystems. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 115. doi: 10.1029/2009JG000993.
45. Vierling, K. T., L. A. Vierling, W. A. Gould, S. Martinuzzi, and R. M. Clawges. 2008. Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 90–98.
46. Wagner, W., M. Hollaus, C. Briese, and V. Ducic. 2008. 3D vegetation mapping using small-footprint full-waveform airborne laser scanners. Int. J. Remote Sens. 29, 1433–1452.
47. Yan, W. Y., A. Shaker, and N. El-Ashmawy. 2015. Urban land cover classification using airborne LiDAR data: a review. Remote Sens. Environ. 158, 295–310.
48. Zimble, D. A., D. L. Evans, G. C. Carlson, R. C. Parker, S. C. Grado, and P. D. Gerard. 2003. Characterizing vertical forest structure using small-footprint airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens. Environ. 87, 171–182.