Improved understanding of stent malapposition using virtual bench testing

Interventional Cardiology: Reviews, Research, Resources

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 106-109

  Mortier, Peter ^a,b   van Beusekom, Heleen M M ^c   De Beule, Matthieu ^a,b   Krabbendam Peters, Ilona ^c   Van Der Smissen, Benjamin ^b,d   De Santis, Gianluca ^b   Ligthart, Jurgen M ^c   Verhegghe, Benedict ^a,b   van der Giessen, Wim J ^c,e  

^a FEops Bvba   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE GHENT   (Belgium)

^e ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bench testing; Finite element simulations; Optical coherence tomography; Stent strut apposition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BARE METAL STENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENTING; IN VITRO STUDY; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEDICAL PROCEDURES; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY DEVICE; SIMULATION; STENT MALAPPOSITION; VIRTUAL STRUT APPOSITION ASSESSMENT;

EID: 85017342800     PISSN: 17561477     EISSN: 17561485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15420/icr.2011.6.2.106     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ozaki Y, Okumura M, Ismail TF, et al. The fate of incomplete stent apposition with drug-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography-based natural history study, Eur Heart J, 2010;31:1470-6
2. Hassan AKM, Bergheanu SC, Stijnen T, et al. Late stent malapposition risk is higher after drug-eluting stent compared with bare-metal stent implantation and associates with late stent thrombosis, Eur Heart J, 2010;31:1172-80
3. Cook S, Wenaweser P, Togni M, et al. Incomplete stent apposition and very late stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation, Circulation, 2007;115:2426-34
4. Radu M, Jorgensen E, Kelbaek H, et al. Strut apposition after coronary stent implantation visualised with optical coherence tomography, EuroIntervention, 2010;6:86-93
5. Mortier P, De Beule M, Segers P, et al. Virtual bench testing of new generation coronary stents, EuroIntervention, accepted for publication
6. Mortier P, Holzapfel GA, De Beule M, et al. A novel simulation strategy for stent insertion and deployment in curved coronary bifurcations: comparison of three drug-eluting stents, Ann Biomed Eng, 2010;38:88-99
7. Mortier P, Computer modelling of coronary bifurcation stenting, PhD Thesis, Ghent University, Belgium, 2010
8. Murray CD, The physiological principle of minimum work. I. The vascular system and the cost of blood volume, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1926;12:207-14
9. Finet G, Gilard M, Perrenot B, et al. Fractal geometry of arterial coronary bifurcations: a quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound analysis, EuroIntervention, 2007;3:490-8
10. Stankovic G, Darremont O, Ferenc M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions: 2008 consensus document from the fourth meeting of the European Bifurcation Club, EuroIntervention, 2009;5:39-49
11. Hildick-Smith D, Lassen JF, Albiero R, et al. Consensus from the 5th European Bifurcation Club meeting, EuroIntervention, 2010;6:34-8
12. O'Brien BJ, Stinson JS, Larsen SR, et al. A platinum-chromium steel for cardiovascular stents, Biomaterials, 2010;31:3755-61
13. van der Giessen A, Schaap M, Gijsen F, et al. 3D fusion of intravascular ultrasound and coronary computed tomography for in-vivo wall shear stress analysis-a feasibility study, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2010;26:781-96