A new methodology for surcharge risk management in urban areas (case study: Gonbad-e-Kavus city)

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 823-832

  Hooshyaripor, Farhad ^a   Yazdi, Jafar ^b  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

NSGA II; Optimization; Retention pond; Surcharge risk; SWMM; Urban flood

Indexed keywords

CURVE FITTING; DECISION MAKING; FLOODS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HYDRAULIC MODELS; LAKES; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; RISK MANAGEMENT; STORMS; WATER MANAGEMENT;

LOW-IMPACT DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES; MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM; NON DOMINATED SORTING GENETIC ALGORITHM (NSGA II); NSGA-II; RETENTION POND; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MODEL(SWMM); SWMM; URBAN FLOODS;

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

STORM WATER;

FLOOD CONTROL; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INVESTMENT; METHODOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION; POND; RISK ASSESSMENT; URBAN AREA; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RETENTION;

ARTICLE; CITY; FLOODING; GENETIC ALGORITHM; INVESTMENT; IRAN; METHODOLOGY; POND; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RISK MANAGEMENT; SIMULATION; URBAN AREA; ALGORITHM; THEORETICAL MODEL; URBANIZATION;

IRAN;

ALGORITHMS; CITIES; FLOODS; IRAN; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PONDS; RISK MANAGEMENT; URBANIZATION;

EID: 85017280256     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2016.567     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Damodaram, C. & Zechman, E. M. 2013 Simulation-optimization approach to design low impact development for managing peak flow alterations in urbanizing watersheds. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 139 (3), 290-298.
2. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S. & Meyarivan, T. 2002 A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6 (2), 182-197.
3. Delelegn, S. W., Pathirana, A., Gersonius, B., Adeogun, A. G. & Vairavamoorthy, K. 2011 Multi-objective optimisation of cost-benefit of urban flood management using a 1D2D coupled model. Water Science and Technology 63 (5), 1053-1059.
4. DWA-A 118E 2006 Hydraulic Dimensioning and Verification of Drain and Sewer Systems. DWA (German Association for Water, Wastewater and Waste), Hennef, Germany.
5. Guan, M., Sillanpää, N. & Koivusalo, H. 2015 Assessment of LID practices for restoring pre-development runoff regime in an urbanized catchment in southern Finland. Water Science and Technology 71 (10), 1485-1491.
6. Huber, W. C. & Stouder, M. 2006 BMP Modeling Concepts and Simulation. Open File EPA/600/R-06/033, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA, p. 189.
7. Lee, J. M., Hyun, K. H. & Choi, J. S. 2013 Analysis of the impact of low impact development on runoff from a new district in Korea. Water Science and Technology 68 (6), 1315-1321.
8. Liao, Z. L., Zhang, G. Q., Wu, Z. H., He, Y. & Chen, H. 2015 Combined sewer overflow control with LID based on SWMM: an example in Shanghai, China. Water Science and Technology 71 (8), 1136-1142.
9. Maidment, D. R. 1993 Handbook of Hydrology. McGraw-Hill Education, New York.
10. Mugume, S. N., Gomez, D. E., Fu, G., Farmani, R. & Butler, D. 2015 A global analysis approach for investigating structural resilience in urban drainage systems. Water Research 81, 15-26.
11. Oraei Zare, S., Saghafian, B. & Shamsai, A. 2012 Multi-objective optimization for combined quality-quantity urban runoff control. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16 (12), 4531-4542.
12. Yazdi, J. & Salehi Neyshabouri, S. A. A. 2014 Identifying low impact development strategies for flood mitigation using a fuzzy-probabilistic approach. Environmental Modelling & Software 60, 31-44.