Investigating the need for scholarly communications positions in Association of Academic Health Sciences Libraries member institutions

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 145-149

  Mears, Kim ^a   Bandy, Sandra L ^a  

^a AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; BUDGET; E-MAIL; EDUCATION; HEALTH SCIENCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIBRARY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LIBRARIAN; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNIVERSITY;

COMMUNICATION; FACULTY; HUMANS; LIBRARIANS; LIBRARIES, MEDICAL; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85017268411     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2017.208     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Chan L, Cuplinskas D, Eisen M, Friend F, Genova Y, Guedon JC, Hagemann M, Harnad S, Johnson R, Kupryte R, La Manna M, Rév I, Segbert M, de Souza S, Suber P, Velterop J. Budapest open access initiative: read the Budapest open access initiative [Internet]. Budapest, Hungary: Melissa Hagemann [cited 27 Jul 2016]. .
2. Sugimoto CR, Tsou A, Naslund S, Hauser A, Brandon M, Winter D, Behles C, Finlay SC. Beyond gatekeepers of knowledge: scholarly communication practices of academic librarians and archivists at ARL institutions. Coll Res Libr. 2014 Mar;75(2):145–61. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5860/crl12-398.
3. ACRL Scholarly Communications Committee. Principles and strategies for the reform of scholarly communication 1 [Internet]. Chicago, IL: American Library Association; 2003 [cited 19 Sep 2016]. .
4. National Institutes of Health. NIH public access policy details [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health & Human Services; 2016 [updated 25 Mar 2016; cited 13 Sep 2016]. .
5. Medical Library Association. MLA committees [Internet]. Chicago, IL: The Association; 2016 [cited 27 Jul 2016]. .
6. Association of Academic Health Sciences Libraries. Membership [Internet]. Seattle, WA: The Association; 2016 [cited 18 Oct 2016]. .
7. Cooper ID, Crum JA. New activities and changing roles of health sciences librarians: a systematic review, 1990–2012. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Oct;101(4):268–77. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.008.
8. Radom R, Feltner-Reichert M, Stringer-Stanback K. Organization of scholarly communication resources. SPEC kit 332. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries; 2012.
9. Malefant KJ. Leading change in the system of scholarly communication: a case study of engaging liaison librarians for outreach to faculty. Coll Res Libr. 2010 Jan;71(1):63–76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.71.1.63.
10. Kirchner J. Scholarly communications: planning for the integration of liaison librarian. Res Libr Issues. 2009 Aug;(265):22–8.