National performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium

Radiology

Volumn 283, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 49-58

  Lehman, Constance D ^a   Arao, Robert F ^b   Sprague, Brian L ^c   Lee, Janie M ^d   Buist, Diana S M ^b   Kerlikowske, Karla ^e   Henderson, Louise M ^f   Onega, Tracy ^g   Tosteson, Anna N A ^g   Rauscher, Garth H ^h   Miglioretti, Diana L ⁱ  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMMUNITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOLOGIST; REGISTER; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR INVASION; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; BENCHMARKING; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BENCHMARKING; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; REGISTRIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 85017152777     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016161174     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Wolfe JN. Mammography as a screening examination in breast cancer. Radiology 1965;84: 703-708.
2. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 2012;380(9855):1778-1786.
3. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R. Ten-to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982;69(2):349-355.
4. Andersson I, Janzon L, Sigfússon BF. Mammographic breast cancer screening: a randomized trial in Malmö, Sweden. Maturitas 1985;7(1):21-29.
5. Tabár L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985;1(8433):829-832.
6. Roberts MM, Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, et al. The Edinburgh randomised trial of screening for breast cancer: description of method. Br J Cancer 1984;50(1):1-6.
7. Frisell J, Glas U, Hellström L, Somell A. Randomized mammographic screening for breast cancer in Stockholm: design, first round results and comparisons. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1986;8(1):45-54.
8. Miller AB, Howe GR, Wall C. The National Study of Breast Cancer Screening Protocol for a Canadian randomized controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women. Clin Invest Med 1981;4(3-4):227-258.
9. Bjurstam N, Björneld L, Duffy SW, et al. The Gothenburg breast screening trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization. Cancer 1997;80(11):2091-2099.
10. Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R, et al. Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA 2015;314(15): 1599-1614.
11. DeAngelis CD, Fontanarosa PB. US Preventive Services Task Force and breast cancer screening. JAMA 2010;303(2):172-173.
12. American College of Radiology. American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS Atlas). Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2013.
13. Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Abraham LA, et al. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology 2006;241(1): 55-66.
14. National Cancer Institute DoCCPS, Healthcare Delivery Research Program. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Updated July 6, 2015. Accessed March 4, 2016.
15. Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH, Yankaskas BC, et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169(4):1001-1008.
16. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Performance Benchmarks for Screening Mammography (HHSN261201100031C). http://breastscreening. cancer.gov/statistics/benchmarks/screening/. Updated May 20, 2015. Accessed May 8, 2016.
17. Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, Ichikawa L, Barlow WE, Kerlikowske K. Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med 2008;148(5): 337-347.
18. Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011;155(8): 493-502.
19. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353(17):1773-1783.
20. Lee CS, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Burnside ES, Nagy P, Sickles EA. The National Mammography Database: preliminary data. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;206(4):883-890.
21. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2013;267(1):47-56.
22. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(7):583-589.
23. Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL, et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA 2014;311(24):2499-2507.
24. McCarthy AM, Kontos D, Synnestvedt M, et al. Screening outcomes following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in a general-population screening program. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106(11):dju316.
25. Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology 2013;266(1): 104-113.
26. Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193(2):586-591.
27. Carney PA, Sickles EA, Monsees BS, et al. Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology 2010;255(2):354-361.