The vancouver lung cancer risk prediction model: Assessment by using a subset of the national lung screening trial cohort

Radiology

Volumn 283, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 264-272

  White, Charles S ^a   Dharaiya, Ekta ^b   Campbell, Erin ^c   Boroczky, Lilla ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CANCER RISK; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; LUNG EMPHYSEMA; LUNG NODULE; LUNG TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PREDICTIVE VALUE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; VANCOUVER LUNG CANCER RISK PREDICTION MODEL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; LUNG; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

AGED; CANADA; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 85017133188     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016152627     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, et al. The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol 2015;1(4):505-527.
2. Humphrey L, Deffebach M, Pappas M, et al. Screening for lung cancer: systematic review to update the US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2013.
3. Boiselle PM. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer. JAMA 2013;309(11): 1163-1170.
4. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365(5):395-409.
5. American College of Radiology. Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS). http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/LungRADS. Published 2014. Accessed October 31, 2015.
6. McKee BJ, Regis SM, McKee AB, Flacke S, Wald C. Performance of ACR Lung-RADS in a clinical CT lung screening program. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12(3):273-276.
7. McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med 2013;369(10):910-919.
8. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al. Baseline characteristics of participants in the randomized national lung screening trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102(23):1771-1779.
9. NLST, 2014. NLST-Investigator Data Dictionary (Phase 2-02/14/2012): outcomes through 12/31/2009; data locked as of 1/31/2011; v.06/22/2012, NLST-Database-Query-Tool-Data-Dictionary-2012-10-25-Revised-1-28-2014.doc.
10. Winkler Wille MM, van Riel SJ, Saghir Z, et al. Predictive accuracy of the PanCan lung cancer risk prediction model-external validation based on CT from the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial. Eur Radiol 2015;25(10):3093-3099.