Combining implicit and explicit methods for the evaluation of an ambient persuasive factory display

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7683 LNCS, Issue , 2012, Pages 113-128

  Strasser, Ewald ^a   Weiss, Astrid ^a   Grill, Thomas ^a   Osswald, Sebastian ^a   Tscheligi, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Affect misattribution procedure; Ambient; Amp; Automatic attitude; Implicit; Method triangulation; Methodology; Persuasion

Indexed keywords

AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE; DISPLAY DEVICES; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; IODINE COMPOUNDS; TRIANGULATION;

AFFECT MISATTRIBUTION PROCEDURE; AMBIENT; AUTOMATIC ATTITUDE; IMPLICIT; METHODOLOGY; PERSUASION;

SURVEYS;

EID: 85017101482     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34898-3_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Weiser, M.: The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American 265, 94-104 (1991)
2. Aarts, E.: Ambient Intelligence: A Multimedia Perspective. IEEE MultiMedia 11, 12-19 (2004)
3. Ishii, H., Ullmer, B.: Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In: Proceedings of CHI 1997, pp. 234-241. ACM Press, Atlanta (1997)
4. Riener, A.: Subliminal Persuasion and Its Potential for Driver Behavior Adaptation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transport Systems 13, 71-80 (2012)
5. Rogers, Y., Hazlewood, W.R., Marshall, P., Dalton, N., Hertrich, S.: Ambient influence: can twinkly lights lure and abstract representations trigger behavioral change? In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 261-270 (2010)
6. Ham, J., Midden, C., Beute, F.: Can ambient persuasive technology persuade unconsciously?: Using subliminal feedback to influence energy consumption ratings of household appliances. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp. 29-35 (2009)
7. Balaam, M., Fitzpatrick, G., Good, J., Harris, E.: Enhancing interactional synchrony with an ambient display. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 867-876 (2011)
8. de Ruyter, B.: Social interactions in Ambient Intelligent environments. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments 3, 175-177 (2011)
9. Varela, F.J.: Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3, 330-349 (1996)
10. Vastenburg, M., Keyson, D., De Ridder, H.: Measuring. User Experiences of Prototypical Autonomous Products in a Simulated Home Environment. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol 4551, pp. 998-1007. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
11. Nielsen, L., Kaszniak, A.W.: Conceptual, theoretical, and methodological issues in inferring subjective emotion experience. In: Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment, pp. 361-375 (2007)
12. Mikhail, M., El-Ayat, K., El Kaliouby, R., Coan, J., Allen, J.J.B.: Emotion detection using noisy EEG data. In: Proceedings of the 1st Augmented Human International Conference, pp. 7-14 (2010)
13. Greenwald, A.G., Poehlman, T.A., Uhlmann, E.L., Banaji, M.R.: Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97, 17-41 (2009)
14. Gawronski, B., Conrey, F.R.: The. Implicit Association Test as a measure of automatically activated associations: Range and limits. Psychol. Rundsch 55, 118-126 (2004)
15. Meschtscherjakov, A., Kluckner, P., Pöhr, F., Reitberger, W., Weiss, A., Tscheligi, M., Hohenwarter, K.H., Oswald, P.: Ambient persuasion in the factory: The case of the Operator Guide. In: Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, pp. 1-6. IEEE (2011)
16. Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., Schmitt, M.: A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 31, 1369-1385 (2005)
17. Law, E.L.C.: The measurability and predictability of user experience, pp. 1-10. ACM (2011)
18. Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M.: Now let’s do it in practice: user experience evaluation methods in product development. In: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2008, pp. 3961-3964 (2008)
19. Coan, J.A., Allen, J.J.B.: Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment. Oxford University Press, USA (2007)
20. Vyas, D., van der Veer, G.C.: Rich evaluations of entertainment experience: bridging the interpretational gap. In: Proceedings of the 13th Eurpoean Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics: Trust and Control in Complex Socio-Technical Systems, pp. 137-144 (2006)
21. Bartlett, F.C.: Remembering. Scientia, pp. 221-226 (1935)
22. Hasher, L., Griffin, M.: Reconstructive and reproductive processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4, 318-330 (1978)
23. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwarz, N.: Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation Publications (2003)
24. Loftus, E.F.: Make-believe memories. American Psychologist 58, 867-873 (2003)
25. Mitchell, K.J., Johnson, M.K.: Source monitoring: Attributing mental experiences. The Oxford Handbook of Memory, pp. 179-195 (2000)
26. Roediger III, H.L., McDermott, K.B.: Tricks of memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science 9, 123-127 (2000)
27. McNally, R.J.: Cognitive. bias in the anxiety disorders. In: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol 43, pp. 211-250. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (1996)
28. Wells, A., Matthews, G.: Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (1994)
29. Marlow, D., Crowne, D.P.: Social desirability and response to perceived situational demands. Journal of Consulting Psychology 25, 109-115 (1961)
30. Meschtscherjakov, A., Reitberger, W., Mirlacher, T., Huber, H., Tscheligi, M.: AmIQuin.-An Ambient Mannequin for the Shopping Environment. In: Tscheligi, M., de Ruyter, B., Markopoulus, P., Wichert, R., Mirlacher, T., Meschterjakov, A., Reitberger, W. (eds.) AmI 2009. LNCS, vol 5859, pp. 206-214. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
31. Lee, H., Smeaton, A.F., O’connor, N.E., Smyth, B.: User evaluation of Físchlár-News: An automatic broadcast news delivery system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 24, 145-189 (2006)
32. Aula, A., Majaranta, P., Räihä, K.-J.: Eye-Tracking. Reveals the Personal Styles for Search Result Evaluation. In: Costabile, M.F., Paternó, F. (eds.) INTERACT 2005. LNCS, vol 3585, pp. 1058-1061. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
33. Payne, B.K., Cheng, C.M., Govorun, O., Stewart, B.D.: An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89, 277 (2005)
34. Bassili, J.N.: Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71, 637-653 (1996)
35. Hynes, G., Monaghan, F., Thai, V., Strang, T., O’Sullivan, D.: SAGE: An Ambient Intelligent Framework for Manufacturing. In: 9th IFAC Symposium on Automated Systems Based on Human Skill and, Nancy, France (2006)
36. Steffens, M.C., Konig, S.S.: Predicting. spontaneous big five behavior with implicit association tests. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess 22, 13-20 (2006)
37. Cunningham, W.A., Preacher, K.J., Banaji, M.R.: Implicit. attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychol. Sci 12, 163-170 (2001)
38. McConnell, A.R., Leibold, J.M.: Relations. among the implicit association test, discriminatory behaviour, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Aust. J. Psychol 53, 121 (2001)
39. DeCoster, J., Claypool, H.M.: A meta-analysis of priming effects on impression formation supporting a general model of informational biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8, 2-27 (2004)