What factors influence the value of an urban park within a medium-sized French conurbation?

Urban Forestry and Urban Greening

Volumn 24, Issue , 2017, Pages 45-54

  Sirina, Natalia ^a   Hua, Anthony ^b   Gobert, Julie ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE TROYES   (France)

^b Universite Paris Est   (France)

^c Université Paris Est Marne la Vallée   (France)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Logit model; Park users; Tobit model; Urban park

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; GREENSPACE; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; LOGIT ANALYSIS; URBAN PLANNING; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

AUBE; CHAMPAGNE-ARDENNE; FRANCE; TROYES;

EID: 85017035804     PISSN: 16188667     EISSN: 16108167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. AMF, 2012. Communauté d'agglomération Grand Troyes. http://www.amf.asso.fr/annuaire/?refer=ecpi&id_si=125. Viewed 22 April 2016.
2. Andrews, B., Ferrini, S., Bateman, I., Good parks – bad parks: the influence of perceptions of location on WTP and preference motives for urban parks. J. Environ. Econ. Policy, 2017, 1–21, 10.1080/21606544.2016.1268543.
3. Assessment, U. N. E., 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
4. Bertram, C., Rehdanz, K., The role of urban green space for human well-being. Ecol. Econ. 120 (2015), 139–152, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.013.
5. Bjerke, T., Ostdahl, T., Thrane, C., Strumse, E., Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 5 (2006), 35–44, 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.006.
6. Bolund, P., Hunhammar, S., Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol. Econ. 29 (1999), 293–301, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0.
7. Boutefeu, E., 2005. La demande sociale de la nature en ville, enquête auprès des habitants de l'agglomération lyonnaise, centre d’études sur les réseaux, les transports, l'urbanisme et les constructions publiques (CERTU), Recherches.
8. Bromley, D.W., The Handbook of Environmental Economics. 1995, Blackwell Publications Ltd, London.
9. Brown, G., A theory of urban park geography. J. Leis. Res. 40 (2008), 589–607.
10. Brunon, H., Mosser, M., Le Jardin Contemporain: Renouveau, Expériences Et Enjeux. 2006, Editions Scala, Paris.
11. Burgess, J., Harrison, C.M., Limb, M., People, parks and the urban green: a study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban Stud. 25 (1988), 455–473.
12. Calia, P., Strazzera, E., A sample selection model for protest votes in contingent valuation analysis. Statistica 61 (2001), 473–485.
13. Caula, S., Hvenegaard, G.T., Marty, P., The influence of bird information, attitudes and demographics on public preferences toward urban green spaces. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 8 (2009), 117–128, 10.1016/j.ufug.2008.12.004.
14. Clinch, J.P., Murphy, A., Modelling winners and losers in contingent valuation of public goods: appropriate welfare measures and econometric analysis. Econ. J. 111 (2001), 420–443.
15. Costanza, R., Cumberland, J.H., Daly, H., Goodland, R., Norgaard, R.B., Kubiszewski, I., Franco, C., An Introduction to Ecological Economics. 1997, CRC Press.
16. Costanza, R., Wilson, M.A., Troy, A., Voinov, A., Liu, S., The Value of New Jersey's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. 2006, Institute for sustainable publications Viewed 5 January 2017 http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=iss_pub.
17. Coutts, C., Green Infrastructure and Public Health. 2016, Routledge, New York.
18. DPM, 2014. Dossier de presse: Le Parc des Moulins. Un parc urbain géré durablement, de près de 20 hectares en cœur de ville. https://www.ville-troyes.fr/uploads/Externe/93/204_1337086547_Parcdesmoulins_2012.pdf. Viewed 10 May 2014.
19. De Roo, P., Les Villes Moyennes Françaises: Enjeux Et Perspectives. 2007, DIACT, Paris.
20. DeSA, U. N., 2013. World population prospects: the 2012 revision. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat, New York.
21. Del Saz Salazar, S., Menendez, L.G., Estimating the non-market benefits of an urban park: does proximity matter?. Land Use Policy 24 (2007), 296–305, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.05.011.
22. Del Saz-Salazar, S., Rausell-Köster, P., A Double-Hurdle model of urban green areas valuation: dealing with zero responses. Landsc. Urban Plann. 84 (2008), 241–251, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.08.008.
23. Elmqvist, T., Setälä, H., Handel, S.N., van der Ploeg, S., Aronson, J., Blignaut, J.N., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Nowak, D.J., Kronenberg, J., de Groot, R., Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14 (2015), 101–108, 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001.
24. Ely M., Pitman Sh., 2012. Green Infrastructure. Life support for human habitats. The compelling evidence for incorporating nature into urban environments. A review of research and literature prepared for the Green Infrastructure Project Botanic Gardens of Adelaide Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources.
25. Evans, G.W., Lepore, S.J., Schroeder, A., The role of interior design in human responses to crowding. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70 (1996), 41–46, 10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.41.
26. Fan, Y., French, S.A., Das, K., Family structure and park use among parents. Am. J. Prev. Med. 43 (2012), 520–526, 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.021.
27. Glover, D., Valuing the Environment. Economics for a Sustainable Future. 2010, IDRC.
28. Godbey, G.C., Caldwell, L.L., Floyd, M., Payne, L.L., Contributions of leisure studies and recreation and park management research to the active living agenda. Am. J. Prev. Med. 28 (2005), 150–158, 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.027.
29. Green Surge, A Typology of Urban Green Spaces, Eco-System Services Provisioning Services and Demands. Project Report., 2015 Viewed 17 September 2015 http://greensurge.eu/working-packages/wp3/files/D3.1_Typology_of_urban_green_spaces_1_.pdf/D3.1_Typology_of_urban_green_spaces_v2_.pdf.
30. Gueymard, S., Facteurs Environnementaux De Proximité Et Choix résidentiels », Développement Durable Et Territoires. Développement Durable Économie, géographie, Politique, Droit, Sociologie. 2006 Dossier 7.
31. Hökby, S., Soderqvist, T., Elasticities of demand and willingness to pay for environmental services in Sweden. Environ. Resour. Econ. 26 (2003), 361–383.
32. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES, Version 4.1). 2012, European Environment Agency, 33.
33. Heal, G., Nature and the Marketplace. Capturing the Value of Ecosystem Services. 2000, Island Press.
34. Hougner, C., Colding, J., Söderqvist, T., Economic valuation of a seed dispersal service in the Stockholm National Urban Park, Sweden. Ecol. Econ. 59 (2006), 364–374, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.007.
35. Hsiao, C., Logit and Probit models: the econometrics of panel data. Adv. Stud. Theor. Appl. Econom. 33 (1996), 410–428.
36. INSEE, Populations légales 2012. 2012 Viewed 10 December 2015 http://www.insee.fr/fr/ppp/bases-de-donnees/recensement/populations-legales/departement.asp?dep=10.
37. James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M.D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J., Elmqvist, T., Frith, M., Gordon, C., Greening, K.L., Handley, J., Haworth, S., Kazmierczak, A.E., Ohnston, M.J., Korpela, K., Moretti, M., Niemela, J., Pauleit, S., Roe, M.H., Sadler, J.P., Ward Thompson, C., Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 8 (2009), 65–75, 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001.
38. Jim, C.Y., Chen, W.Y., Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces. Guangzhou, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 75 (2006), 81–96, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.008.
39. Jim, C.Y., Chen, W.Y., Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China. Cities 26 (2009), 187–194, 10.1016/j.cities.2009.03.003.
40. Kabisch, N., Salman, Q., Haase, D., Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces—a systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 50 (2015), 25–34, 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.007.
41. Kremer, P., Hamstead, Z., Haase, D., McPhearson, T., Frantzeskaki, N., Andersson, E., Kabisch, N., Larondelle, N., Lorance Rall, E., Voigt, A., Baró, F., Bertram, C., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Hansen, R., Kaczorowska, A., Kain, J.-H., Kronenberg, J., Langemeyer, J., Pauleit, S., Rehdanz, K., Schewenius, M., van Ham, C., Wurster, D., Elmqvist, T., Key insights for the future of urban ecosystem services research. Ecol. Soc., 21, 2016, 10.5751/es-08445-210229.
42. Little, C.E., Greenways for America, Creating the North American Landscape. 1990, Johns Hopkins University Press.
43. Lo, A., Jim, C.Y., Willingness of residents to pay and motives for conservation of urban green spaces in the compact city of Hong Kong. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 9 (2010), 113–120, 10.1016/j.ufug.2010.01.001.
44. Long, N., Tonini, B., Les espaces verts urbains: étude exploratoire des pratiques et du ressenti des usagers. VertigO −la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement, 2012, 12.
45. Loomis, J., Kent, P., Strange, L., Fausch, K., Covich, A., Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecol. Econ. 33 (2000), 103–117, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00131-7.
46. Lopez-Mosquera, N., Sanchez, M., Emotional and satisfaction benefits to visitors as explanatory factors in the monetary valuation of environmental goods. An application to land use policy peri-urban green spaces. Land Use Policy 28 (2011), 151–166, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.008.
47. Lopez-Mosquera, N., Sanchez, M., The influence of personal values in the economic-use valuation of peri-urban green spaces: an application to the means-end theory chain theory. Tour. Manage. 32 (2011), 875–889, 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.08.003.
48. Lotfi, M., Weber, C., Di Pietro, F., Wissal, S., Évolution de la place du végétal dans la ville, de l'espace vert a la trame verte. VertigO −la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement, 2012, 12.
49. Luttik, J., The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landsc. Urban Plann. 48 (2000), 161–167, 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00039-6.
50. MEA, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-being. 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
51. McFadden, D., Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka, P., (eds.) Frontiers in Econometrics, 1974, Academic Press, New York.
52. Milcu, A.I., Hanspach, J., Abson, D., Fischer, J., Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol. Soc., 18, 2013, 10.5751/es-05790-180344.
53. Mitchell, R.C., Carson, R.T., Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. 1989, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
54. O'Connor, M., Spash, C., Valuation and the Environment: Theory, Method, and Practice. 1999, Edward Elgar Publishing.
55. Laws, decrees: Order N 2015/1820. Arrêté N 2015/1820 du Pôle Urbanisme, Patrimoine, Service Techniques « Règlement de police du parc des Moulins » Troyes, le 27 mars 2015.
56. Payne, L.L., Mowen, A.J., Orsega-Smith, E., An examination of park preferences and behaviors among urban residents: the role of residential location, race, and age. Leis. Sci.: Interdiscip. J. 24 (2002), 181–198, 10.1080/01490400252900149.
57. Payne, L.L., Orsega-Smith, E., Roy, M., Godbey, G.C., Local park use and personal health among older adults: an exploratory study. J. Park Recreat. Adm. 23 (2005), 1–20.
58. Potschin, M.B., Haines-Young, R.H., Ecosystem services: exploring a geographical perspective. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35 (2011), 575–594.
59. Sandström, U.G., Green infrastructure planning in urban Sweden. Plan. Pract. Res. 17 (2002), 373–385, 10.1080/02697450216356.
60. Schläpfer, F., Contingent valuation: a new approach. Ecol. Econ. 64 (2008), 729–740, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.010.
61. Sukhdev, P., Wittmer, H., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Nesshöver, C., Bishop, J., Ten Brink, P., Simmons, B., et al. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: a Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. 2010, European Communities.
62. Tyrväinen, L., Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland. J. Environ. Manage. 62 (2001), 75–92.
63. Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kazmierczak, A., Niemela, J., James, P., Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 81 (2007), 167–178.
64. Van Herzele, A., Wiedemann, T., A monitoring tool for provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landsc. Urban Plan. 63 (2003), 106–109, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5.
65. Verbeek, M., A Guide to Modern Econometrics. 2004, Wiley (2nd rev. and updated ed.), Chichester.
66. Verlicchi, P., Al Aukidy, M., Galletti, A., Zambello, E., Zanni, G., Masotti, L., A project of reuse of reclaimed wastewater in the Po valley, Italy: polishing sequence and cost benefit analysis. J. Hydrol. 432–433 (2012), 127–136, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.024.