The changing agenda for social science research on Latin America

Latin America in Comparative Perspective: New Approaches to Methods and Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 1-30

  Smith, Peter H ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85017011043     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429499371     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Julio Cotler, “Algunas reflexiones sobre el futuro de las ciencias sociales en América Latina,” Papers on Latin America, no. 9 (New York: Institute of Latin American and Iberian Studies, Columbia University, 1989).
2. Ronald Chilcote, “Tensions in the Latin American Experience: Fundamental Themes in the Formulation of a Research Agenda for the 1990s,” Latin American Perspectives 65, no. 17 (Spring 1990): 122-128.
3. Arend Lijphart, “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method,” American Political Science Review (1971) 65, no. 3: 682-693.
4. Arend Lijphart, “The Comparable Cases Strategy in Comparative Research,” Comparative Political Studies 8 (1975): 158-177.
5. Barrington Moore, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966).
6. Charles C. Ragin, The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987).
7. Charles Tilly, Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1984), with quotes from pp. 80-86 and 145.
8. Ragin, The Comparative Method, pp. 36-42.
9. Adam Przeworski and Henry Teune, The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1970) esp. pp. 31-46.
10. Carlos Waisman, “Prospects for Interregional Comparisons: Political Processes in the Southern Cone and Eastern Europe” (paper prepared for the conference “Latin America in Comparative Perspective: Issues and Methods,” Quito, Ecuador, July 29-31,1993).
11. Tilly, Big Structures, pp. 116-117.
12. David A. Smith and Douglas R. White, “Structure and Dynamics of the Global Economy: Network Analysis of International Trade, 1965-1980,” Social Forces 70, no. 4 (June 1992): 857-893.
13. David A. Smith, “Overurbanization Reconceptualized: A Political Economy of the World-System Approach,” Urban Affairs Quarterly 23, no. 2 (December 1987): 270-294.
14. Tilly, Big Structures, and Theda Skocpol, ed., Vision and Method in Historical Sociology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).
15. Guillermo O’Donnell, Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics (Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California, 1973).
16. Fernando Henrique Cardoso, “The Consumption of Dependency Theory in the United States,” Latin American Research Review 12, no. 3 (1977): 7-16.
17. Barbara Stallings, “International Influence on Economic Policy: Debt, Stabilization, and Structural Reform,” in Stephan R. Haggard and Robert Kaufman, eds., The Politics of Economic Adjustment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992), pp. 41-88, esp. pp. 44-48.
18. Peter H. Smith and Peter Zung, “The Third World after the Cold War: A Conference Report,” CILAS Working Papers, no. 1 (La Jolla: Center for Iberian and Latin American Studies [CILAS], University of California, San Diego, May 1992), p. 13.
19. Robert Packen-ham, The Dependency Movement: Scholarship and Politics in Development Studies (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992).
20. Peter H. Smith, “Crisis and Democracy in Latin America,” World Politics 43, no. 4 (July 1991): 608-634.
21. Claudia Leite and Peter H. Smith, “Social Science Research on Latin America: A Conference Report,” CILAS Working Papers, no. 2 (La Jolla: Center for Iberian and Latin American Studies, University of California, San Diego, 1992), p. 4.
22. Samuel P. Huntington, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991), pp. 59-72.
23. Mitchell Seligson, “Democratization in Latin America: The Current Cycle,” in James M. Malloy and Mitchell A. Seligson, eds., Authoritarians and Democrats: Regime Transition in Latin America (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1987), pp. 7-9.
24. James W. Wilkie, The Mexican Revolution: Federal Expenditure and Social Change Since 1910 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967).
25. Thomas E. Skidmore and Peter H. Smith, “Notes on Quantitative History: Federal Expenditure and Social Change in Mexico since 1910,” Latin American Research Review 7, no. 1 (Spring 1970): 71-85.
26. Philippe C. Schmitter, “New Strategies for the Comparative Analysis of Latin American Politics,” Latin American Research Review 4, no. 2 (Summer 1969): 83-110.
27. Peter H. Smith, Labyrinths of Power: Political Recruitment in Twentieth-Century Mexico (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).
28. Roderic A. Camp, Education and Recruitment in Twentieth Century Mexico (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1980).
29. Generals in the Palacio: The Military in Modern Mexico (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).
30. Peter McDonough, Power and Ideology in Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981).
31. Barry Ames, Political Survival: Politicians and Public Policy in Latin America (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987).
32. Peter H. Smith, Argentina and the Failure of Democracy: Conflict Among Political Elites, 1905-1955 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974).
33. Amparo Menéndez-Carrión, La conquista del voto: De Velasco a Roldos (Quito: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, 1986).
34. Judith Gentleman, ed., Mexican Politics in Transition (Boulder: Westview Press, 1987)
35. Joseph L. Klesner, “Changing Patterns of Electoral Participation and Official Party Support in Mexico,” pp. 95-152.
36. Edgar W. Butler and Jorge Bustamante, eds., Sucesion Presidential: The 1988 Mexican Presidential Election (Boulder: Westview Press, 1991).
37. Manuel Moray Araujo and Peter H. Smith, “Peronism and Economic Development: The 1973 Elections,” in Frederick C. Turner and José Miguens, eds., Juan Perón and the Reshaping of Argentina (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1983), pp. 171-188.
38. Robert Kaufman, Daniel Geller, and Harry Chernofsky, “A Preliminary Test of the Theory of Dependency,” Comparative Politics 7, no. 3 (1975): 303-330.
39. Kenneth Bollen, “World System Position, Dependency, and Democracy: The Cross-National Evidence,” American Sociological Review 48 (August 1983): 468-479.
40. Steven Jackson, Bruce Russett, Duncan Snidal, and David Sylvan, “An Assessment of Empirical Research on Dependencia,” Latin American Research Review 14, no. 3 (1979): 7-28.
41. Frederick C. Turner, ed., Social Mobility and Political Attitudes: Comparative Perspectives (New Brunswick: Transaction Press, 1992).
42. Carl Solberg, Immigration and Nationalism: Argentina and Chile, 1890-1914 (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1970).
43. Charles Bergquist, Labor in Latin America: Comparative Essays on Chile, Argentina, Venezuela, and Colombia (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1986).
44. Ruth Berins Collier and David Collier, Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991).
45. Thomas E. Skidmore and Peter H. Smith, Modern Latin America, 3d ed., rev. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), esp. pp. 382-394.
46. Timothy P. Wickham-Crowley, Guerrillas and Revolution in Latin America: A Comparative Study of Insurgents and Regimes Since 1956 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992), esp. pp. 302-326.
47. John Fogarty, Ezequiel Gallo, Héctor Dieguez, Argentina y Australia (Buenos Aires: Instituto Torcuato di Telia, 1979).
48. Carl E. Solberg, The Prairies and the Pampas: Agrarian Policy in Canada and Argentina, 1880--1930 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987).
49. Smith, Labyrinths of Power, pp. 20,130-132,176-183.
50. Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York: Academic Press, 1974).
51. Fernando Henrique Cardoso and Enzo Faletto, Dependency and Development in Latin America, trans. Marjory Mattingly Urquidi (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).
52. Gary Gereffi and Donald L. Wyman, eds., Manufacturing Miracles: Paths of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990).
53. Laurence Whitehead, “Tigers in Latin America?" Annals AAPSS 505 (September 1989): 142-151.
54. Stephan Haggard, Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990).
55. José Luis Rodriguez and Brian H. Smith, “Comparative Working-Class Political Behavior: Chile, France, and Italy,” American Behavioral Scientist 18, no. 3 (September-October, 1974).
56. Peter H. Smith, ed., The Challenge of Integration: Europe and the Americas (Miami: North-South Center, 1993).
57. Arend Lijphart and Carlos Waisman, eds., Institutional Design in New Democracies (Boulder: Westview Press, forthcoming in this series).
58. Leite and Smith, “Social Science Research,” pp. 22-23.
59. Drake, “From Retrogression to Resurgence,” pp. 30-32.
60. Leite and Smith, “Social Science Research,” pp. 4-5.
61. Leite and Smith, “Social Science Research,” pp. 3-9.
62. Coatsworth, “International Collaboration in the Social Sciences,” pp. 9-10.
63. John D. Martz, “Political Science and Latin American Studies: Patterns and Asymmetries of Research and Publication,” Latin American Research Review 25, no. 1 (1990): 67-86.
64. Philippe C. Schmitter, “Comparative Politics at the Crossroads,” Estudios/Working Papers, no. 27 (Madrid: Institute) Juan March de Estudios e Investiga-ciones, 1991, pp. 18-19.
65. George Tsebelis, Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990).