Ontologies and representation spaces for sketch map interpretation

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 1697-1721

  Wang, Jia ^a   Worboys, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

information artefact; interpretation; ontology; representation space; Sketch map

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT; MAP; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85016971996     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2017.1309043     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Appleyard, D., 1970. Styles and methods of structuring a city. Environment and behavior, 2 (1), 100–117. doi:10.1177/001391657000200106
2. Arp, R., Smith, B., and Spear, A.A.D., 2015. Building ontologies with basic formal ontology. Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press.
3. Billinghurst, M., and Weghorst, S., 1995. The use of sketch maps to measure cognitive maps of virtual environments. In Proceedings of Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 11-15March 1995, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA:IEEE, 40–47.
4. Blades, M., 1990. The reliability of data collected from sketch maps. Journal of environmental psychology, 10 (4), 327–339. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80032-5
5. Broelemann, K., Jiang, X., and Schwering, A., 2011. Automatic street graph construction in sketch maps. In International workshop on graph-based representations in pattern recognition, 18-20May 2011, Muenster, Germany:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 275–284.
6. Broelemann, K., Jiang, X., and Schwering, A., 2016. Automatic understanding of sketch maps using context-aware classification. Expert systems with applications, 45, 195–207. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.09.037.
7. Catford, J.J.C., 1965. A linguistic theory of translation. London:Oxford University Press.
8. Chen, J., and Takagi, N., 2013. A pattern recognition method for automating tactile graphics translation from hand-drawn maps. In 2013 IEEE International conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, 13-16October 2013, Manchester, UK:IEEE, 4173–4178.
9. Chrastil, E.E.R., and Warren, W.W.H., 2014. From cognitive maps to cognitive graphs. PLoS One, 9 (11), e112544. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112544.
10. Clementini, E., and Di Di Felice, P., 1996. A model for representing topological relationships between complex geometric features in spatial databases. Information sciences, 90 (1), 121–136. doi:10.1016/0020-0255(95)00289-8.
11. Curtis, J.W., et al. 2014. The prospects and problems of integrating sketch maps with geographic information systems to understand environmental perception:A case study of mapping youth fear in Los Angeles gang neighborhoods. Environment and planning B:planning and design, 41 (2), 251–271. doi:10.1068/b38151.
12. Davis, R., 2002. Sketch understanding in design:overview of work at the MIT AI lab. In 2002 AAAI spring symposium, 25–27March 2002, Palo Alto, California:AAAI, 24–31.
13. Davis, R., 2007. Magic paper:sketch-understanding research. IEEE computer, 40 (9), 34–41. doi:10.1109/MC.2007.324.
14. Forbus, K., et al., 2011. CogSketch:sketch understanding for cognitive science research and for education. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(4), 648–666. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01149.x.
15. Galton, A., et al. 2016. Ontological levels in histological imaging. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, 283, 271-284.
16. th International conference on information systems for crisis response and management, 8-11May 2011, Lisbon.
17. th International conference on knowledge engineering and knowledge management, 1-4October 2002, Siguenza, Spain:Springer London, 166–181.
18. Guo, Z., and Hall, R.R.W., 1989. Parallel thinning with two-subiteration algorithms. Communications of the ACM, 32 (3), 359–373. doi:10.1145/62065.62074.
19. Hudelot, C., Atif, J., and Bloch, I., 2008. Fuzzy spatial relation ontology for image interpretation. Fuzzy sets and systems, 159 (15), 1929–1951. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2008.02.011
20. IAO., 2014. Available from:http://www.ontobee.org/ontology/IAO?iri=http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000308 [Accessed 25October 2016]
21. Ishikawa, T., et al. 2008. Wayfinding with a GPS-based mobile navigation system:A comparison with maps and direct experience. Journal of environmental psychology, 28 (1), 74–82. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.002.
22. Kuipers, B., 1983. The cognitive map:could it have been any other way?. In:H.L., Pick Jr and L.P., Acredolo, eds. Spatial orientation–thoery, research, and application. New York:Plenum Press, 345–359.
23. th International conference on spatial information theory, 19-23September 2001, Morro Bay, CA, USA:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 44–59.
24. Lloyd, R., and Heivly, C., 1987. Systematic distortions in urban cognitive maps. Annals of the association of american geographers, 77 (2), 191–207. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(81)90016-5
25. Lynch, K., 1960. The image of the city. Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press.
26. th International Conference on Spatial Cognition, 15-19September 2008, Freiburg Germany:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 344–360.
27. Montello, D.D.R., 1993. Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In:A.U., Frank and I., Campari, eds. Spatial information theory:theoretical basis for geographic information science. Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences No. 716. Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 312–321.
28. Newcombe, N., 1985. Methods for the study of spatial cognition. In:R. Cohen, ed. The development of spatial cognition. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 277–300.
29. nd International conference on formal ontology in information systems, 17-19October 2001, Oqunquit, ME, USA:ACM, 2–9.
30. Schwering, A., et al. 2014. SketchMapia:qualitative representations for the alignment of sketch and metric maps. Spatial cognition & computation, 14 (3), 220–254. doi:10.1080/13875868.2014.917378.
31. Sezgin, T.T.M., Stahovich, T., and Davis, R., 2006. Sketch based interfaces:early processing for sketch understanding. In Proceedings of the Special interest group on computer graphics and interactive techniques conference, 30July-3 August 2006, Boston, MA, USA:ACM, 22–22.
32. Smeulders, A.A.W., et al. 2000. Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 22 (12), 1349–1380. doi:10.1109/34.895972.
33. th Conference on semantic technologies for intelligence, defense, and security, 12-15November 2013, Fairfax, VA, USA:CEUR, 33–40.
34. Smith, B., and Malyuta, T., 2015. IAO-Core:towards a general-purpose, top-level information artifact ontology. Available from:http://documents.tips/documents/iao-core-towards-a-general-purpose-top-level-information-artifact-ontology-5686638001112.html [Accessed 25October 2016]
35. Smith, B., and Varzi, A.C., 2000. Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philosophical and phenomenological research, 401–420. 10.2307/2653492
36. Tolman, E.C., 1948. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological review, 55 (4), 189–208. doi:10.1037/h0061626.
37. th International workshop on document analysis systems, 19-21August 2002, Princeton, NJ, USA:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 200–211.
38. Tversky, B., 2000. Levels and structure of spatial knowledge. Cognitive mapping:past, present and future, 24–43.
39. Tversky, B., and Lee, P.U., 1999. Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In:C. Freksa and D.M., Mark, eds. Spatial information theory. cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science. COSIT1999 Lecture notes in Computer Science, vol. 1661. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 51–64.
40. Wang, J., 2014. Qualitative sketch aspects for sketch map alignment. Thesis (PhD). University of Muenster.
41. Wang, J., and Schwering, A., 2015. Invariant spatial information in sketch maps—a study of survey sketch maps of urban areas. Journal of spatial information science, 2015 (11), 31–52.
42. Worboys, M., and Duckham, M., 2004. GIS:A computing perspective. Boca Raton, FL:CRC press.