Mappings and Metaphors in Auditory Displays: An Experimental Assessment

ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 407-412

  Walker, Bruce N ^a   Kramer, Gregory ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Metta Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory display; Data mapping; Experimentation; Guidelines; Human FactorsPerformance; Metaphors; Sonification

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016909437     PISSN: 15443558     EISSN: 15443965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1101530.1101534     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Fitch, T. and Kramer, G. 1994. Sonifying the body electric: Superiority of an auditory display over a visual display in a complex, multivariate system. In Auditory Display: Sonification, Audification, and Auditory Interfaces, G. Kramer, Ed. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 307-325.
2. Gaver, W., Smith, R. B., and O'Shea, T. 1991. Effective sounds in complex systems: The ARKola simulation. In Proceedings of CHI 1991, held April 28-May 2, New Orleans, LA. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
3. Kramer, G. 1994a. An introduction to auditory display. In Auditory Display: Sonification, Audification, and Auditory Interfaces, G. Kramer, Ed. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 1-77.
4. Kramer, G. 1994b. Some organizing principles for representing data with sound. In Auditory Display: Sonification, Audification, and Auditory Interfaces, G. Kramer, Ed. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 185-221.
5. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
6. Melara, R. D. and O'Brien, T. P. 1990. Interaction between synesthetically corresponding dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116, 4, 323-336.
7. PATTERSON, R. D. 1982. Guidelines for auditory warning systems on civil aircraft. Paper No. 82017, Civil Aviation Authority, London.
8. Pollack, I. and Ficks, L. 1954. Information of elementary multidimensional auditory displays. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 26, 155-158.
9. Proctor, R. W. and Reeve, T. G., Eds. 1990. Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective. North Holland, Amsterdam.
10. Revesz, G. 1954. Introduction to the Psychology of Music. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
11. SHneiderman, B. 1992. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction (2e.). Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
12. Tufte, E. 1990. Envisioning Information. Graphics Press.
13. Walker, B. N. and Ehrenstein, A. 1996. Cross-dimensional compatibility effects with dynamic auditory stimuli. Paper presented at the Southwest Psychological Association 42nd Annual Convention. Houston, April 4-6, 1996.