Economic and Environmental Life Cycle Optimization of Noncooperative Supply Chains and Product Systems: Modeling Framework, Mixed-Integer Bilevel Fractional Programming Algorithm, and Shale Gas Application

ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 3362-3381

  Gao, Jiyao ^a   You, Fengqi ^a  

^a Cornell University   (United States)

Author keywords

Game theory; Life cycle optimization; Noncooperative; Shale gas; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GAME THEORY; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; NETWORK FUNCTION VIRTUALIZATION; OPTIMIZATION; PRODUCTION CONTROL; SHALE; SHALE GAS; SUPPLY CHAINS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

COMPUTATIONAL CHALLENGES; CONFLICTING OBJECTIVES; DECOMPOSITION METHODS; ENVIRONMENTAL LIFE CYCLE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; FRACTIONAL PROGRAMMING; NON-COOPERATIVE SUPPLY CHAINS; NONCOOPERATIVE;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 85016815135     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21680485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00002     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Mota, B.; Gomes, M. I.; Carvalho, A.; Barbosa-Povoa, A. P. Towards supply chain sustainability: economic, environmental and social design and planning J. Cleaner Prod. 2015, 105, 14-27 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.052
2. Srivastava, S. K. Green Supply-Chain Management: A State-of-The-Art Literature Review Int. J. Manage. Rev. 2007, 9, 53-80 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x
3. Hugo, A.; Pistikopoulos, E. N. Environmentally conscious long-range planning and design of supply chain networks J. Cleaner Prod. 2005, 13, 1471-1491 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.04.011
4. Calderón, A. J.; Guerra, O. J.; Papageorgiou, L. G.; Siirola, J. J.; Reklaitis, G. V. Preliminary evaluation of shale gas reservoirs: Appraisal of different well-pad designs via performance metrics Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 10334-10349 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01590
5. You, F.; Tao, L.; Graziano, D. J.; Snyder, S. W. Optimal Design of Sustainable Cellulosic Biofuel Supply Chains: Multiobjective Optimization Coupled with Life Cycle Assessment and Input-Output Analysis AIChE J. 2012, 58, 1157-1180 10.1002/aic.12637
6. Wang, B.; Gebreslassie, B. H.; You, F. Sustainable design and synthesis of hydrocarbon biorefinery via gasification pathway: Integrated life cycle assessment and technoeconomic analysis with multiobjective superstructure optimization Comput. Chem. Eng. 2013, 52, 55-76 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.12.008
7. Santibañez-Aguilar, J. E.; González-Campos, J. B.; Ponce-Ortega, J. M.; Serna-González, M.; El-Halwagi, M. M. Optimal planning and site selection for distributed multiproduct biorefineries involving economic, environmental and social objectives J. Cleaner Prod. 2014, 65, 270-294 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.004
8. Yue, D.; Kim, M. A.; You, F. Design of Sustainable Product Systems and Supply Chains with Life Cycle Optimization Based on Functional Unit: General Modeling Framework, Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming Algorithms and Case Study on Hydrocarbon Biofuels ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 1003-1014 10.1021/sc400080x
9. Gong, J.; You, F. Global Optimization for Sustainable Design and Synthesis of Algae Processing Network for CO2Mitigation and Biofuel Production Using Life Cycle Optimization AIChE J. 2014, 60, 3195-3210 10.1002/aic.14504
10. Gao, J.; You, F. Shale Gas Supply Chain Design and Operations toward Better Economic and Life Cycle Environmental Performance: MINLP Model and Global Optimization Algorithm ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1282-1291 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00122
11. Garcia, D. J.; You, F. Network-Based Life Cycle Optimization of the Net Atmospheric CO2-eq Ratio (NACR) of Fuels and Chemicals Production from Biomass ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1732-1744 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00262
12. Garcia, D. J.; You, F. Multiobjective Optimization of Product and Process Networks: General Modeling Framework, Efficient Global Optimization Algorithm, and Case Studies on Bioconversion AIChE J. 2015, 61, 530-551 10.1002/aic.14666
13. Santibañez-Aguilar, J. E.; González-Campos, J. B.; Ponce-Ortega, J. M.; Serna-González, M.; El-Halwagi, M. M. Optimal planning of a biomass conversion system considering economic and environmental aspects Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 8558-8570 10.1021/ie102195g
14. Bartholomew, T. V.; Mauter, M. S. Multiobjective optimization model for minimizing cost and environmental impact in shale gas water and wastewater management ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 3728-3735 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00372
15. Gong, J.; You, F. Sustainable design and synthesis of energy systems Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2015, 10, 77-86 10.1016/j.coche.2015.09.001
16. Garcia, D. J.; You, F. Q. Supply chain design and optimization: Challenges and opportunities Comput. Chem. Eng. 2015, 81, 153-170 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.03.015
17. Nagarajan, M.; Sošić, G. Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions Eur. J. Oper Res. 2008, 187, 719-745 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.045
18. Leng, M.; Parlar, M. Game-theoretic analyses of decentralized assembly supply chains: Non-cooperative equilibria vs. coordination with cost-sharing contracts Eur. J. Oper Res. 2010, 204, 96-104 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.10.011
19. Gao, J.; You, F. Game theory approach to optimal design of shale gas supply chains with consideration of economics and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions. AIChE J. 2017, DOI: 10.1002/aic.15605.
20. Gjerdrum, J.; Shah, N.; Papageorgiou, L. G. Fair transfer price and inventory holding policies in two-enterprise supply chains Eur. J. Oper Res. 2002, 143, 582-599 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00349-6
21. Lou, H. H.; Kulkarni, M. A.; Singh, A.; Huang, Y. L. A game theory based approach for emergy analysis of industrial ecosystem under uncertainty Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2004, 6, 156-161 10.1007/s10098-003-0235-6
22. Ryu, J.-H.; Dua, V.; Pistikopoulos, E. N. A bilevel programming framework for enterprise-wide process networks under uncertainty Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 28, 1121-1129 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2003.09.021
23. Hjaila, K.; Laínez-Aguirre, J. M.; Puigjaner, L.; Espuña, A. Scenario-based dynamic negotiation for the coordination of multi-enterprise supply chains under uncertainty Comput. Chem. Eng. 2016, 91, 445-470 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.04.004
24. Hjaila, K.; Laínez-Aguirre, J. M.; Zamarripa, M.; Puigjaner, L.; Espuña, A. Optimal integration of third-parties in a coordinated supply chain management environment Comput. Chem. Eng. 2016, 86, 48-61 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.12.002
25. Yue, D.; You, F. Game-theoretic modeling and optimization of multi-echelon supply chain design and operation under Stackelberg game and market equilibrium Comput. Chem. Eng. 2014, 71, 347-361 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.08.010
26. Cachon, G.; Netessine, S. Game theory in supply chain analysis. In Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis; Simchi-Levi, D.; Wu, S. D.; Shen, Z.-J., Eds.; Springer US: New York, 2004; Vol. 74, Chapter 2, pp 13-65.
27. Vives, X. Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand Journal of economic theory 1984, 34, 71-94 10.1016/0022-0531(84)90162-5
28. Myerson, R. B. Game Theory; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 2013.
29. Von Stackelberg, H.; Bazin, D.; Hill, R.; Urch, L. Market Structure and Equilibrium; Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
30. Yu, Y.; Huang, G. Q.; Liang, L. Stackelberg game-theoretic model for optimizing advertising, pricing and inventory policies in vendor managed inventory (VMI) production supply chains Computers & Industrial Engineering 2009, 57, 368-382 10.1016/j.cie.2008.12.003
31. Wang, B.; Han, Z.; Liu, K. J. R. Distributed Relay Selection and Power Control for Multiuser Cooperative Communication Networks Using Stackelberg Game IEEE. Trans. Mob. Comput. 2009, 8, 975-990 10.1109/TMC.2008.153
32. Yue, D.; You, F. Stackelberg-game-based modeling and optimization for supply chain design and operations: A mixed integer bilevel programming framework Comput. Chem. Eng. 2017, 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.07.026
33. Moore, J. T.; Bard, J. F. The mixed integer linear bilevel programming problem Oper. Res. 1990, 38, 911-921 10.1287/opre.38.5.911
34. Yue, D.; You, F. A projection-based reformulation and decomposition algorithm for optimization of a class of mixed integer bilevel linear programs. In 26 European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering; Kravanja, Z., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp 481-486.
35. Guinée, J. Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2002; Vol. 7.
36. Goedkoop, M.; Spriensma, R. The Eco-indicator 99: A Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment; PRé Consultants B.V.: Amersfoort, The Netherlands, 1999.
37. Goedkoop, M.; Heijungs, R.; Huijbregts, M.; De Schryver, A.; Struijs, J.; van Zelm, R. ReCiPe 2008: A Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Which Comprises Harmonised Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint Level; Ministerie van VROM, 2009.
38. Colson, B.; Marcotte, P.; Savard, G. An overview of bilevel optimization Ann. Oper Res. 2007, 153, 235-256 10.1007/s10479-007-0176-2
39. Gümüş, Z. H.; Floudas, C. A. Global optimization of mixed-integer bilevel programming problems CMS 2005, 2, 181-212 10.1007/s10287-005-0025-1
40. You, F.; Castro, P. M.; Grossmann, I. E. Dinkelbach’s algorithm as an efficient method to solve a class of MINLP models for large-scale cyclic scheduling problems Comput. Chem. Eng. 2009, 33, 1879-1889 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.05.014
41. Zhong, Z.; You, F. Globally convergent exact and inexact parametric algorithms for solving large-scale mixed-integer fractional programs and applications in process systems engineering Comput. Chem. Eng. 2014, 61, 90-101 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.10.017
42. Chu, Y.; You, F. Integration of production scheduling and dynamic optimization for multi-product CSTRs: Generalized Benders decomposition coupled with global mixed-integer fractional programming Comput. Chem. Eng. 2013, 58, 315-333 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.08.003
43. Laurenzi, I. J.; Jersey, G. R. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Freshwater Consumption of Marcellus Shale Gas Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 4896-4903 10.1021/es305162w
44. Stephenson, T.; Valle, J. E.; Riera-Palou, X. Modeling the Relative GHG Emissions of Conventional and Shale Gas Production Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 10757-10764 10.1021/es2024115
45. DOE/NETL. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Inventory of Natural Gas Extraction, Delivery and Electricity Production; DOE/NETL-2011/1522; DOE/NETL: Washington, DC, 2011.
46. Gao, J.; You, F. Design and optimization of shale gas energy systems: Overview, research challenges, and future directions. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.01.032.
47. Heath, G. A.; Meldrum, J.; Fisher, N.; Arent, D.; Bazilian, M. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from Barnett Shale gas used to generate electricity Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources 2014, 8, 46-55 10.1016/j.juogr.2014.07.002
48. O’Donoughue, P. R.; Heath, G. A.; Dolan, S. L.; Vorum, M. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of electricity generated from conventionally produced natural gas J. Ind. Ecol. 2014, 18, 125-144 10.1111/jiec.12084
49. He, C.; You, F. Deciphering the true life cycle environmental impacts and costs of the mega-scale shale gas-to-olefins projects in the United States Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 820-840 10.1039/C5EE02365C
50. He, C.; You, F. Toward More Cost-Effective and Greener Chemicals Production from Shale Gas by Integrating with Bioethanol Dehydration: Novel Process Design and Simulation-Based Optimization AIChE J. 2015, 61, 1209-1232 10.1002/aic.14713
51. EIA. Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2014; EIA: Washington, DC, 2014.
52. Weber, C. L.; Clavin, C. Life cycle carbon footprint of shale gas: Review of evidence and implications Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 5688-5695 10.1021/es300375n
53. Guo, Z.; Cheng, R.; Xu, Z.; Liu, P.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Jones, I.; Sun, Y. A multi-region load dispatch model for the long-term optimum planning of China’s electricity sector Appl. Energy 2017, 185 ( Part 1 ) 556-572 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.132
54. EIA. U.S. Natural gas consumption by enduse. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_cons_sum_dcu_nus_m.htm (accessed 5/20).
55. Burnham, A.; Han, J.; Clark, C. E.; Wang, M.; Dunn, J. B.; Palou-Rivera, I. Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 619-627 10.1021/es201942m
56. Hultman, N.; Rebois, D.; Scholten, M.; Ramig, C. The greenhouse impact of unconventional gas for electricity generation Environ. Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 044008 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044008
57. Jiang, M.; Griffin, W. M.; Hendrickson, C.; Jaramillo, P.; VanBriesen, J.; Venkatesh, A. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Marcellus shale gas Environ. Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 034014 10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034014
58. DOE/NETL. Role of Alternative Energy Sources: Natural Gas Power Technology Assessment; DOE/NETL-2012/1539; DOE/NETL: Washington, DC, 2012.
59. Dale, A. T.; Khanna, V.; Vidic, R. D.; Bilec, M. M. Process based life-cycle assessment of natural gas from the Marcellus shale Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 5459-5466 10.1021/es304414q
60. Heath, G. A.; O’Donoughue, P.; Arent, D. J.; Bazilian, M. Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111, E3167-E3176 10.1073/pnas.1309334111
61. IPCC. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
62. Yang, L.; Grossmann, I. E.; Mauter, M. S.; Dilmore, R. M. Investment optimization model for freshwater acquisition and wastewater handling in shale gas production AIChE J. 2015, 61, 1770-1782 10.1002/aic.14804
63. Yang, L.; Grossmann, I. E.; Manno, J. Optimization models for shale gas water management AIChE J. 2014, 60, 3490-3501 10.1002/aic.14526
64. Lira-Barragan, L. F.; Ponce-Ortega, J. M.; Serna-Gonzalez, M.; El-Halwagi, M. M. Optimal reuse of flowback wastewater in hydraulic fracturing including seasonal and environmental constraints AIChE J. 2016, 62, 1634-1645 10.1002/aic.15167
65. Guerra, O. J.; Calderón, A. J.; Papageorgiou, L. G.; Siirola, J. J.; Reklaitis, G. V. An optimization framework for the integration of water management and shale gas supply chain design Comput. Chem. Eng. 2016, 92, 230-255 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.03.025
66. Gao, J.; You, F. Deciphering and handling uncertainty in shale gas supply chain design and optimization: Novel modeling framework and computationally efficient solution algorithm AIChE J. 2015, 61, 3739-3755 10.1002/aic.15032
67. He, C.; You, F. Shale Gas Processing Integrated with Ethylene Production: Novel Process Designs, Exergy Analysis, and Techno-Economic Analysis Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 11442-11459 10.1021/ie5012245
68. Johnson, K. Natural gas processors respond to rapid growth in shale gas production. http://www.aogr.com/magazine/cover-story/natural-gas-processors-respond-to-rapid-growth-in-shale-gas-production.
69. Pan, I. Natural gas processing contracts and how they affect profits and valuation. http://marketrealist.com/2013/01/natural-gas-processing-contracts-and-how-they-affect-profits-and-valuation/ (accessed 9/21).
70. Drouven, M. G.; Grossmann, I. E. Multi-period planning, design, and strategic models for long-term, quality-sensitive shale gas development AIChE J. 2016, 62, 2296-2323 10.1002/aic.15174
71. EIA. Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2016; EIA: Washington, DC, 2016.
72. FracFocus Frac Focus Chemical Disclosure Registry. http://www.fracfocus.org/ (accessed 10/13).
73. Ladlee, J.; Jacquet, J. The implications of multi-well pads in the Marcellus Shale. Community and Regional Development Institute at Cornell (CaRDI) Research and Policy Brief Series; No. 43; Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, 2011.
74. Swindell, G. S. In SPE Annual Meeting; Dallas, TX, 2014.
75. EIA. Annual Energy Outlook 2015 with Projections to 2040; DOE/EIA-0383(2015); EIA: Washington, DC, 2015.
76. EIA. Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2015; EIA: Washington, DC, 2015.
77. Hammond, G. P.; Akwe, S. S. O.; Williams, S. Techno-economic appraisal of fossil-fuelled power generation systems with carbon dioxide capture and storage Energy 2011, 36, 975-984 10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.012
78. Rubin, E. S.; Zhai, H. The cost of carbon capture and storage for natural gas combined cycle power plants Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 3076-3084 10.1021/es204514f
79. Gong, J.; You, F. Optimal Design and Synthesis of Algal Biorefinery Processes for Biological Carbon Sequestration and Utilization with Zero Direct Greenhouse Gas Emissions: MINLP Model and Global Optimization Algorithm Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 1563-1579 10.1021/ie403459m
80. Gebreslassie, B. H.; Waymire, R.; You, F. Sustainable Design and Synthesis of Algae-Based Biorefinery for Simultaneous Hydrocarbon Biofuel Production and Carbon Sequestration AIChE J. 2013, 59, 1599-1621 10.1002/aic.14075
81. Leperi, K. T.; Snurr, R. Q.; You, F. Optimization of Two-Stage Pressure/Vacuum Swing Adsorption with Variable Dehydration Level for Postcombustion Carbon Capture Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 3338-3350 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03122
82. Davison, J. Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2 Energy 2007, 32, 1163-1176 10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.039
83. Cafaro, D. C.; Grossmann, I. E. Strategic planning, design, and development of the shale gas supply chain network AIChE J. 2014, 60, 2122 10.1002/aic.14405
84. Marcellus-Shale.us Real Marcellus Gas Production. http://www.marcellus-shale.us/Marcellus-production.htm (accessed 8/29).
85. Calderón, A. J.; Guerra, O. J.; Papageorgiou, L. G.; Siirola, J. J.; Reklaitis, G. V. Financial considerations in shale gas supply chain development. In Comput.-Aided Chem. Eng.; Krist, V.; Gernaey, J. K. H.; Rafiqul, G., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2015; Vol. 37, pp 2333-2338.
86. Gong, J.; Yang, M.; You, F. A systematic simulation-based process intensification method for shale gas processing and NGLs recovery process systems under uncertain feedstock compositions Comput. Chem. Eng. 2016, 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.11.010
87. Brooke, A.; Kendrick, D. A.; Meeraus, A.; Rosenthal, R. E. GAMS: A User’s Guide; GAMS Development Corporation: Washington, DC, 1988.
88. EIA. Annual Energy Outlook 2014 with Projections to 2040; DOE/EIA-0383(2014); EIA: Washington, DC, 2014.
89. Skone, T. J. Role of Alternative Energy Sources: Natural Gas Technology Assessment; NETL/DOE-2012/1539; NETL/DOE: Washington, DC, 2012.
90. Guo, Z.; Liu, P.; Ma, L.; Li, Z. Effects of low-carbon technologies and end-use electrification on energy-related greenhouse gases mitigation in China by 2050 Energies 2015, 8, 7161 10.3390/en8077161
91. Gao, J.; You, F. Optimal Design and Operations of Supply Chain Networks for Water Management in Shale Gas Production: MILFP Model and Algorithms for the Water-Energy Nexus AIChE J. 2015, 61, 1184-1208 10.1002/aic.14705