Personality and social networks: A generative model approach

Integrative and Comparative Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1197-1205

  Ilany, Amiyaal ^a   Akçay, Erol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; PERSONALITY; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 85016766229     PISSN: 15407063     EISSN: 15577023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/icw068     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Allen J, Weinrich M, Hoppitt W, Rendell L. 2013. Networkbased diffusion analysis reveals cultural transmission of lobtail feeding in humpback whales. Science 340:485-8.
2. Aplin L, Farine D, Morand-Ferron J, Cole E, Cockburn A, Sheldon B. 2013. Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major). Ecol Lett 16:1365-72.
3. Aplin LM, Farine DR, Morand-Ferron J, Cockburn A, Thornton A, Sheldon BC. 2015a. Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds. Nature 518:538-41.
4. Aplin L, Firth J, Farine D, Voelkl B, Crates R, Culina A, Garroway C, Hinde C, Kidd L, Psorakis I, et al. 2015b. Consistent individual differences in the social phenotypes of wild great tits, Parus major. Anim Behav 108:117-27.
5. Barocas A, Ilany A, Koren L, Kam M, Geffen E. 2011. Variance in centrality within rock hyrax social networks predicts adult longevity. PLoS One 6:e22375.
6. Bar-Ziv E, Ilany A, Demartsev V, Barocas A, Geffen E, Koren L. 2016. Individual, social, and sexual niche traits affect copulation success in a polygynandrous mating system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:901-12.
7. Cameron EZ, Setsaas TH, Linklater WL. 2009. Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:13850-3.
8. Cantor M, Shoemaker L, Cabral R, Flores C, Varga M, Whitehead H. 2015. Multilevel animal societies can emerge from cultural transmission. Nat Commun 6:8091.
9. Carter AJ, Lee AE, Marshall HH, Tico MT, Cowlishaw G. 2015. Phenotypic assortment in wild primate networks: implications for the dissemination of information. Roy Soc Open Sci 2:140444.
10. Croft DP, Krause J, Darden SK, Ramnarine IW, Faria JJ, James R. 2009. Behavioural trait assortment in a social network: patterns and implications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1495-503.
11. Godfrey SS, Bradley JK, Sih A, Bull CM. 2012. Lovers and fighters in sleepy lizard land: where do aggressive males fit in a social network? Anim Behav 83:209-15.
12. Goldenberg SZ, Douglas-Hamilton I, Wittemyer G. 2016. Vertical transmission of social roles drives resilience to poaching in elephant networks. Curr Biol 26:75-9.
13. Hamede RK, Bashford J, McCallum H, Jones M. 2009. Contact networks in a wild Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) population: using social network analysis to reveal seasonal variability in social behaviour and its implications for transmission of devil facial tumour disease. Ecol Lett 12:1147-57.
14. Ilany A, & Akcay E. 2016. Social inheritance can explain the structure of animal social networks. Nat. Commun. 7:12084. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12084.
15. Ilany A, Barocas A, Koren L, Kam M, Geffen E. 2013. Structural balance in the social networks of a wild mammal. Anim Behav 85:1397-405.
16. Ilany A, Booms AS, Holekamp KE. 2015. Topological effects of network structure on long-term social network dynamics in a wild mammal. Ecol Lett 18:687-95.
17. Jackson MO, Rogers BW. 2007. Meeting strangers and friends of friends:howrandomaresocialnetworks?AmEconRev97:890-915.
18. Keiser CN, Pinter-Wollman N, Augustine DA, Ziemba MJ, Hao L, Lawrence JG, Pruitt JN. 2016. Individual differences in boldness influence patterns of social interactions and the transmission of cuticular bacteria among group-mates. Proc R Soc B 283:20160457.
19. Krause J, Croft D, James R. 2007. Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: potential applications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:15-27.
20. Krause J, James R, Croft D. 2010. Personality in the context of social networks. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:4099-106.
21. Lusseau D. 2003. The emergent properties of a dolphin social network. Proc R Soc B 270:S186-8.
22. Massen JJ, Koski SE. 2014. Chimps of a feather sit together: chimpanzee friendships are based on homophily in personality. Evol Hum Behav 35:1-8.
23. Moore C, Ghoshal G, Newman MEJ. 2006. Exact solutions for models of evolving networks with addition and deletion of nodes. Phys Rev E 74:036121.
24. Muniz DG, Guimaraes PR, Buzatto BA, Machado G. 2015. A sexual network approach to sperm competition in a species with alternative mating tactics. Behav Ecol 26:121-9.
25. Newman ME. 2003. Mixing patterns in networks. Phys Rev E 67:026126.
26. Newman MEJ, Park J. 2003. Why social networks are different from other types of networks. Phys Rev E 68:036122.
27. Oh KP, Badyaev AV. 2010. Structure of social networks in a passerine bird: consequences for sexual selection and the evolution of mating strategies. Am Nat 176:E80-9.
28. Pike TW, Samanta M, Lindstrom J, Royle NJ. 2008. Behavioural phenotype affects social interactions in an animal network. Proc R Soc B 275:2515-20.
29. Pinter-Wollman N. 2015. Persistent variation in spatial behavior affects the structure and function of interaction networks. Curr Zool 61:98-106.
30. Pinter-Wollman N, Hobson EA, Smith JE, Edelman AJ, Shizuka D, de Silva S, Waters JS, Prager SD, Sasaki T, Wittemyer G, et al. 2014. The dynamics of animal social networks: analytical, conceptual, and theoretical advances. Behav Ecol 25:242-55.
31. Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, Oltvai ZN, Baraba si AL. 2002. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297:1551-5.
32. Servedio MR, Brandvain Y, Dhole S, Fitzpatrick CL, Goldberg EE, Stern CA, Van Cleve J, Yeh DJ. 2014. Not just a theory-the utility of mathematical models in evolutionary biology. PLoS Biol 12:e1002017.
33. Seyfarth RM. 1977. A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. J Theor Biol 65:671-98.
34. Snijders L, van Rooij EP, Burt JM, Hinde CA, Van Oers K, Naguib M. 2014. Social networking in territorial great tits: slow explorers have the least central social network positions. Anim Behav 98:95-102.
35. Tanner CJ, Jackson AL. 2012. Social structure emerges via the interaction between local ecology and individual behaviour. J Anim Ecol 81:260-7.
36. Webster MM, Ward AJ. 2011. Personality and social context. Biol Rev 86:759-73.
37. Wey T, Blumstein DT, Shen W, Jordan F. 2008. Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Anim Behav 75:333-44.
38. Whitehead H. (2008). Analyzing animal societies: quantitative methods for vertebrate social analysis. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
39. Williams RJ, Martinez ND. 2000. Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 404:180-3.
40. Wilson AD, Krause S, Dingemanse NJ, Krause J. 2013. Network position: a key component in the characterization of social personality types. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:163-73.
41. Wolf M, Krause J. 2014.Why personality differences matter for social functioning and social structure. Trends Ecol Evol 29:306-8.