A lightweight dependency analyzer for partial parsing

Natural Language Engineering

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 113-138

  Srinivas, Bangalore ^a  

^a AT AND T LABS RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016658864     PISSN: 13513249     EISSN: 14698110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1351324900002345     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abney, S. (1990) Rapid Incremental parsing with repair. Proc. 6th New OED Conference: Electronic Text Research, pp. 1–9. Waterloo, Canada.
2. Appelt, D., Hobbs, J. Bear, J., Israel, D. J. and Tyson, M. (1993) FASTUS: a finite-state processor for information extraction from real-world text. Proc. IJCAI-93, Chambery, France.
3. Bangalore, S. and Aravind Joshi (1999) Supertagging: An approach to almost parsing. Computational Linguistics 25(2).
4. Proc, E., Brill, P., Resnik, A rule-based approach to prepositional phrase attachment disambiguation, Int. Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING '94), Kyoto, Japan, 1994
5. Brill, E. (1993) Automatic grammar induction and parsing free text: A transformation-based approach. Proc. 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Columbus, OH.
6. Chandrasekar, R., Doran, C. and Srinivas, B. (1996) Motivations and methods for text simplification. Proc. 16th Int. Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING '96). Copenhagen, Denmark.
7. Chandrasekar, R. and Srinivas, B. (1997) Automatic induction of rules for text simplification. Knowledge-Based Systems 10: 183–190.
8. Chandrasekar, R. and Srinivas, B. (1997) Gleaning information from the web: Using syntax to filter out irrelevant information. Proc. AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium on NLP on the World Wide Web.
9. R., Chandrasekar, B., Srinivas, Proc. Recent Advances in NLP (RANLP) '97. Tzigov Chark. Chandrasekar, R. and Srinivas, B. (1997) Using syntactic information in document filtering: A comparative study of part-of-speech tagging and supertagging. Proc. RIAO'97, Using supertags in document filtering: The effect of increased context on information retrieval effectiveness., Montreal, Canada, 1997.
10. Chelba, C. and Jelinek, F. (1998) Exploiting Syntactic Structure for Language Modeling. Proc. ACL '98, pp. 225–231. Montreal, Canada.
11. Church, K. W. (1988) A stochastic parts progaodtxram and noun phrase parser for unrestricted text. 2nd Applied Natural Language Processing Conference. Austin, TX.
12. Cole, R. A., Mariani, J., Uszkoreit, H. Zaenen, A. and Zue, V. (1996) Survey of the state of the art in human language technology. http://www.cse.ogi.edu/CSLU/HLTsurvey/.
13. Collins, M. (1996) A New Statistical Parser Based on Bigram Lexical Dependencies. Proc. 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Santa Cruz, NM.
14. Collins, M. (1997) Three Generative, Lexicalised Models for Statistical Parsing. Proc. 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Madrid, Spain.
15. Collins, M. and Brook, J. (1995) Prepositional phrase attachment through a backed-off model. Proc. 3rd Workshop on Very Large Corpora. Cambridge, Boston, MA.
16. Proc, C., Doran, M., Niv, B., Baldwin, J., Reynar, B., Srinivas, Mother of Perl: A Multi-tier Pattern Description Language, Int. Workshop on Lexically Driven Information Extraction, Frascati, Italy, 1997.
17. Proc. 3rd TAG+ Conference, C., Doran, B., Srinivas, A wide-coverage CCG parser, Int. Workshop on Lexically Driven Information Extraction. Frascati, Italy., Paris, France, 1994.
18. Doran, C. (1996) Punctuation in quoted speech. Proc. SIGPARSE96. Santa Cruz, CA,
19. Fujisaki, T., Cocke, J. J., Black, E. and Nishino, T. (1989) A probabilistic parsing method for sentence disambiguation. Proc. 1st Annual International Workshop of Parsing Technologies. Pittsburgh.
20. Grishman, R. (1995) Where's the Syntax? The New York University MUC-6 System. Proc. 6th Message Understanding Conf. Columbia, MD.
21. Harrison, P. Abney, S., Fleckenger, D., Gdaniec, C., Grishman, R., Hindle, D., Ingria, B., Marcus, M., Santorini, B. and Strzalkowski, T. (1991) Evaluating syntax performance of parser/grammars of English. Proc. Workshop on Evaluating Natural Language Processing Systems. ACL.
22. Hindle, D. and Rooth, M. (1991) Structural ambiguity and lexical relations. 29th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Berkeley, CA.
23. J.R., Hobbs, D., Appelt, J., Bear, D., Israel, M., Kameyama, M., Stickel, M., Tyson, FASTUS: A Cascaded Finite-State Transducer for Extracting Information from Natural-Language Text, In: E. Roche and Schabes Y, Finite State Devices for Natural Language Processing. MIT Press., 1997.
24. Proc. ARP A Workshop on Human Language Technology Workshop, F., Jelinek, J., Lafferty, D.M., Magerman, R., Mercer, A., Ratnaparkhi, S., Roukos, Decision tree parsing using a hidden derivation model, In: E. Roche and Schabes Y., editors, Finite State Devices for Natural Language Processing. MIT Press., March., 1994.
25. Chen, J., Srinivas, B. and Vijay-Shanker, K. (1999) New models for improving supertag disambiguation. Proc. 9th Conf. European Chapter of Association for Computational Linguistics. Bergen, Norway.
26. Joshi, A. and Hopely, P. (1997) A parser from antiquity. Natural Lang. Eng. 2(4).
27. Advances in Documentation and Library Science, A.K., Joshi, Computation of Syntactic Structure, 3 Part 2. Wiley Interscience, 1960.
28. Proc. 17th Int. Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING '94), A.K., Joshi, B., Srinivas, Disambiguation of super parts of speech (or supertags): Almost parsing, Advances in Documentation and Library Science, Vol. III Part 2. Wiley Interscience., Kyoto, Japan, 1994.
29. Karttunen, L., Chanod, J.-P. Grefenstette, G. and Schiller, A. (1997) Regular expressions for language engineering. Natural Lang. Eng. 2(4).
30. A dependency-based method for evaluating broad-coverage parsers, J., Lafferty, D., Sleator, D., Temperley, Grammatical Trigrams: A Probabilistic Model of Link Grammar, Montreal, Canada, August., 1992.
31. Lin, D. (1996) Evaluation of principar with the Susanne corpus. Proc. Workshop on Robust Parsing at European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information. Prague.
32. Magerman, D. M. (1995) Statistical decision-tree models for parsing. Proc. 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
33. Marcus, M. M., Santorini, B. and Marcinkiewicz, M. A. (1993) Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics 19(2):313-330.
34. Mohri, M., Pereira, F. C. N. and Riley, M. (1998) A rational design for a weighted finite-state transducer library. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1436. Springer-Verlag.
35. Rambow, O., Weir, D. and Vijay-Shanker, K. (1995) D-Tree Grammars. Proc. 33rd Conference of Association of Computational Linguistics.
36. Ramshaw, L. and Marcus, M. P. (1995) Text chunking using transformation-based learning. Proc. 3rd Workshop on Very Large Corpora. Cambridge, Boston, MA.
37. Ratnaparkhi, A., Reynar, J. and Roukos, S. (1994) A maximum entropy model for prepositional phrase attachment. Proc. ARP A Workshop on Human Language Technology. Plainsboro, NJ.
38. Ratnaparkhi, A. (1997) A linear observed time statistical parser based on maximum entropy models. Proc. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. New Providence.
39. Roche, E. (1993) Analyse syntaxique transformationelle du francais par transducteurs et lexique-grammaire. PhD thesis, Universite Paris 7.
40. Sampson, G. (1994) SUSANNE: a Doomsday book of English grammar. Corpus-based Research into Language. Rodopi, Amsterdam.
41. Schabes, Y., Roth, M. and Osborne, R. (1993) Parsing the Wall Street Journal with the Inside-Outside Algorithm. Proc. European ACL.
42. Schabes, Y. (1990) Mathematical and Computational Aspects of Lexicalized Grammars. PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, University of Pennsylvania.
43. Schabes, Y., Abeille, A. and Joshi, A. K. (1988) Parsing strategies with lexicalized’ grammars: Application to Tree Adjoining Grammars. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING'88). Budapest, Hungary.
44. Schabes, Y. and Shieber, S. (1992) An alternative conception of tree-adjoining derivation. Proc. 20th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
45. Srinivas, B. (1996) “Almost Parsing” Technique for Language Modeling. Proc. ICSLP 96 Conference. Philadelphia, USA.
46. Srinivas, B. (1997) Complexity of Lexical Descriptions and its Relevance to Partial Parsing. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
47. Srinivas, B. (1997) Performance evaluation of supertagging for partial parsing. Proc. Fifth Int. Workshop on Parsing Technology. Boston, USA.
48. Srinivas, B., Doran, C. and Kulick, S. (1995) Heuristics and parse ranking. Proc. 4th Annual International Workshop on Parsing Technologies. Prague.
49. Strzalkowski, T., Lin, F., Perez-Carballo, J. and Wang, W. (1997) Building effective queries in natural language information retrieval. Proc. Applied NLP (ANLP) '91. Washington, DC.
50. Weischedel, R., Schwartz, R., Palmucci, J., Meteer, M. and Ramshaw, J. (1993) Coping with ambiguity and unknown words through probabilistic models. Computational Linguistics 19(2):359-382.
51. XTAG-Group. (1995) A Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar for English. Technical Report IRCS 95–03, University of Pennsylvania. Updated version available at http://www.cis.upenn.edu/xtag/tr/tech-report.html.