Violence against women as conveyed by surveys–the Finnish case

Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 173-193

  Piispa, Minna ^a  

^a Statistics Finland   (Finland)

Author keywords

Age; Partial non response; Partnership; Survey; Violence against women

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016587639     PISSN: 14043858     EISSN: 16512340     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14043850310013160     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Dobash RE, Dobash R, 1992 Women, Violence and Social Change. London:Routledge
2. Finkelhor D, Yllö K, 1985 License to Rape:Sexual Abuses of Wives. New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston
3. Groves RJ, 1989 Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York:John Wiley and Sons
4. Galtung J, 1977 Theory and Methods of Social Research. Oslo:Universitetsforlaget
5. Hagemann-White, C. 2001. European Research on the Prevalence of Violence Against Women. Violence Against Women 7, 7:732–59.
6. Hearn J, 1998 The Violences of Men:How Men Talk About and How Agencies Respond to Men's Violence to Women. London:Sage
7. Hearn J, Lattu E, Tallberg T, 2001 Finland National Report on Statistical Information on Men's Practices Workpackage 2. EU FP5 Thematic Network. The European Research Network on Men in Europe:The Social Problem and Societal Problematisation of Men and Masculinities (HPSE-CT-1999-0008)
8. Heiskanen M, 2000 How to Study Sensitive Topics. In:Keeler L (ed.). Recommendations of the E.U. Expert Meeting on Violence Against Women. 8–10 November 1999, Jyväskylä, Finland. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health 2000:13. Helsinki:Edita Oy:129–36
9. Heiskanen M, 2002 Väkivalta, pelko, turvattomuus. Surveytutkimuksen näkökulmia turvallisuuteen [Violence, fear, insecurity. The personal security of Finns in the light of survey research]. Research Reports 236. Helsinki:Statistics Finland
10. Heiskanen M, Piispa M, 1998 Faith, Hope, Battering. A Survey of Men's Violence against Women in Finland. Justice 1998:20. Equality between men and women. OSF. Helsinki:Statistics Finland and Council for Equality
11. Hydèn M, 1995 Kvinnomisshandel inom äktenskapet. Mellan det möjliga och det omöjliga. [Assaults on women within marriage] Falköping:Liber
12. Johnson H, 1996 Dangerous Domains. Violence Against Women in Canada. Toronto, Canada:Nelson
13. Johnson, H, and Sacco, VF. 1995. Researching violence against women:Statistics Canada's national survey. Canadian Journal of Criminology, July 1995:281–304.
14. Julkunen R, 1999 Sukupuoli, työ, hyvinvointivaltio. Suomi vertailussa [Gender, work, welfare state]. In:Lipponen P, Setälä P (eds.). Suomalainen nainen [The Finnish woman]. Keuruu:Otava:79–100
15. Kelly L, 1988 Surviving sexual violence. Cambridge:Polity Press
16. Lahti M, 2001 Domesticated Violence. The Power of the ordinary in everyday Finland. University of Helsinki. Helsinki:Helsinki University Printing House
17. Lundgren E, 1992 Gud och alla andra karlar. [God and all other men] Stockholm:Natur och kultur
18. Lundgren E, Heimer G, Westerlund J, Kalliokoski A-M, 2001 Slagen dam. Mäns våld mot kvinnor i jämställda Sverige–en omfångsundersökning. [Captured Queen Men's violence against women in “equal” Sweden–a prevalance study] Brottsoffermyndigheten. [The Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority] Uppsala Universitet. Åströms tryckeri Ab, Umeå
19. Marsh C, 1982 The Survey Method. The contribution of surveys to sociological explanation. George Allen and Unwin, London
20. McLennan W, 1996 Women's Safety. ABS Catalogue No. 4128.0. Australian Government Publishing Service
21. Messerschmidt JW, 1993 Masculinities and Crime. Critique and Reconceptualization of Theory. USA:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc
22. Mirrlees-Black C, Budd T, Partridge S, Mayhew P, 1998 The 1998 British Crime Survey. England and Wales. Home Office Statistical Bulletin 21/98
23. Mooney J, 1993 The Hidden Figure:Domestic Violence in North London. The findings of a survey conducted on domestic violence in the north London Borough of Islington. Centre for Criminology. Middlesex University
24. Persson LGW, 1980 Hidden criminality–theoretical and methodological problems, empirical results. Stockholm:University of Stockholm
25. Piispa M, Heiskanen M, 2000 The Price of Violence. The Costs of Men's Violence against Women in Finland. Statistics Finland. Council for Equality. Publications on Equality 2000:7. Justice 2001:3. Equality between men and women. OSF. Helsinki
26. Piispa, M. 2000. Modernisaation paradokseja. Nuorten naisten kokema parisuhdeväkivalta Suomessa [Paradoxes of Modernisation. Experiences of Partner Violence by Young Women in Finland.]. Naistutkimus kvinnoforskning, 4:4–18.
27. Piispa, M. 2002. Complexity of Patterns of Violence Against Women in Heterosexual Partnerships. Violence Against Women., 8(7):873–900.
28. Piispa M, 2004 Age and Meanings of Violence. Women's Experiences of Partner Violence in Finland. Interpersonal Journal of Violence. 19(1):(Forthcoming)
29. Ronkainen S, 1999 Ajan ja paikan merkitsemät. Subjektiviteetti, tieto ja toimijuus [Marked by time and space; subjectivity, knowledge and agency]. Tampere:Gaudeamus
30. Ronkainen, S. 2001. Sukupuolistunut väkivalta ja uhriutumisen paradoksit [Sexualized violence and paradoxes of victimisation]. Sosiaalilääketieteellinen aikakauslehti 2001, 38:139–51.
31. Radford J, Stanko EA, 1996 Violence against women and children:the contradictions of crime control under patriarchy. In:Hester M, Kelly L, Radford J (eds.). Women, Violence and Male Power. Feminist activism, research and practise, Buckingham:Open University Press:65–80
32. Römkens, R. 1997. Prevalence of Wife Abuse in the Netherlands. Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Survey Research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(1):99–125.
33. Smith, MD. 1994. ‘Enhancing the Quality of Survey Data on Violence Against Women:A Feminist Approach’. Gender & Society, 3:109–27.
34. Straus MA, 1992 Conflict Tactics Scale and Its Critics:An Evaluation on New Data on Validity and Reliability. In:Straus MA, Gelles RJ (eds.). Physical Violence in American Families. Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families. New Jersey:New Brunswick:49–71
35. Straus MA, 1999 The Controversy over Domestic Violence by Women:A Methodological, theoretical, and Sociology of Science Analysis. In:Arriaga XB, Oskamp S (eds.). Violence in Intimate Relationships. California:Thousand Oaks, Sage:17–44
36. Straus MA, Gelles RJ, (eds.) Physical Violence in American Families. Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families. New Jersey:New Brunswick
37. Sudman S, Bradburn NM, Schwartz N, 1996 Thinking about Answers. The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers
38. Tjaden P, Thoennes N, 2000 Extend, Nature and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence. Findings From the National Violence against Women Survey. Research report, www. U.S. Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice/Centers for Disease Control Prevention
39. Walby, S, and Myhill, A. 2001. New survey methodologies in researching violence against women. British Journal of Criminology, 41:502–22.