What digital formats do consumers prefer?

Newspaper Research Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 2-19

  Schierhorn, Cari ^a   Wearden, Stanley T ^a   Schierhorn, Ann B ^a   Tabar, Pamela S ^a   Andrews, Scott C ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016461137     PISSN: 07395329     EISSN: 23764791     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073953299902000301     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Roger Fidler, Mediamorphosis: Understanding New Media. Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge Press, 1997, p. 227.
2. Roger Fidler, Mediamorphosis: Understanding New Media. Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge Press, 1997, p. 236.
3. Roger Fidler, Mediamorphosis: Understanding New Media. Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge Press, 1997, p. 421.
4. Douglas K. Smith and Robert C. Alexander, Fumbling the Future: How Xerox Invented, Then Ignored the First Personal Computer. New York: Morrow, 1988, p. 89.
5. Roger Fidler, Keynote Address, Interactive Newspaper Conference, Houston, Texas, February 13, 1997.
6. D.J. Osborne and D. Holton, Reading from Screen Versus Paper: There is no Difference. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1988, Vol. 28, pp. 1-9.
7. Davenport, M. Cronin and Margaret H. DeFleur, Audience Recall of News Stories Presented by newspaper, Computer, Televisión and Radio. Journalism Quarterly, 1992, Vol. 69, pp. 1010-1022.
8. D.R. Thompson, The Digital Daily: How Will Readers React? Paper presented to the Newspaper División of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Commu-nication, Southeast Colloquium, Gainesville, Florida, March 1995.
9. Jennifer Mueller and David Kamerer, fíeader Preference for Electronic Newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal, 1995, Vol. 16, No. 3, p. 11.
10. A. Dillon, J. Richardson and C. McKnight, The Effects of Display Size and Text Splitting on Reading Lengthy Text from Screens. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1990, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 215-227.
11. S. M. Ross, G. R. Morrison and C. W. Schultz, Preferences for Different CBI Text Screen Designs Based on the Density and Level of Realism of the Lesson Contení Viewed. Computers in Human Behavior, 1994, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 593-603.
12. R.S. Grabinger, Computer Screen Designs: Viewer Judgments. Educational Technology Research and Deveiopment, 1993, Vol. 41, No. 2, p. 70.
13. Stanley T. Wearden, Roger Fidfer, Ann B. Schierhorn and Carl Schierhorn, Portrait vs. Landscape: Potential User's Preferences for Screen Orientation. Presented to the Newspaper Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication for presentation at the Annual Convention, Baltimore, Maryland, August 1998.