Type of discharge and risk of recidivism measured by the hcr-20: A retrospective study in a dutch sample of treated forensic psychiatric patients

International Journal of Forensic Mental Health

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 149-165

  De Vogel, Vivienne ^a   Ruiter, Corine De ^b   Hildebrand, Martin ^c   Bos, Brechje ^c   De Ven, Peter Van ^c  

^a Department of Research at the Dr Henri van der Hoeven Kliniek in Utrecht ^*  (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c Expertise Center for Forensic Psychiatry   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016326615     PISSN: 14999013     EISSN: 19329903     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2004.10471204     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Boer, D. P., Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Webster, C. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20. Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, British Columbia: BC Institute against Family Violence.
3. Borum, R. (1996). Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment: Technology, guidelines and training. American Psychologist, 51, 945-956.
4. DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristics curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44, 837-854.
5. Dempster, R. J. (1998). Prediction of sexually violent recidivism: A comparison of risk assessment instruments. Unpublished master’s thesis. Vancouver, British Columbia: Simon Fraser University.
6. Dolan, B., & Coid, J. (1993). Psychopathic and antisocial personality disorders: Treatment and research issues. London: Gaskell.
7. Douglas, K. S., & Weir, J. (2003). HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography. Available: http:www.sfu.ca/psychology/groups/faculty/hart/violink/htm.
8. Douglas, K. S., & Webster, C. D. (1999). Predicting violence in mentally and personality disordered individuals. In R. Roesch, S.D. Hart, & J.R.P. Ogloff (Eds.), Psychology and law: The state of discipline (pp. 175–239). New York: Kluwer Academic.
9. Douglas, K. S., Cox, D. N., & Webster, C. D. (1999). Violence risk assessment: Science and practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 149-184.
10. Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Hart, S. D. (2003). Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients. Psychiatric Services, 54, 1372-1379.
11. Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R. P., Nicholls, T. L., & Grant, I. (1999). Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 917-930.
12. Fleiss, J.L. (1986). The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley.
13. Gardner, W., Lidz, C. W., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1996). Clinical versus actuarial predictions of violence in patients with mental illnesses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1-8.
14. Grann, M., Långström, N., Tengström, A., & Kullgren, G. (1999). Psychopathy (PCL-R) predicts violent recidivism among criminal offenders with personality disorders in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 205-216.
15. Grann, M., Långström, N., Tengström, A., & Stålenheim, E. G. (1998). The reliability of file-based retrospective ratings of psychopathy with the PCL-R. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 416-426.
16. Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323.
17. Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist- Revised. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.
18. Hare, R. D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised Second Edition. Technical Manual. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.
19. Hare, R. D., Clark, D., Grann, M., & Thornton, D. (2000). Psychopathy and the predictive validity of the PCL-R: An international perspective. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 623-645.
20. Hart, S. D. (1998). Psychopathy and the risk for violence. In D.J. Cooke, A.E., Forth, & R.D. Hare (Eds.), Psychopathy: Theory, research and implications for society (pp. 355-373). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
21. Hart, S. D., Cox, D., & Hare, R. D. (1995). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL-SV). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
22. Hemphill, J. F., Templeman, R., Wong, S., & Hare, R. D. (1998). Psychopathy and crime: Recidivism and criminal careers. In D.J. Cooke, A.E. Forth, & R.D. Hare (Eds.), Psychopathy: Theory, research and implications for society (pp. 375-399). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
23. Hildebrand, M., & de Ruiter, C. (2004). PCL-R psychopathy and its relation to DSM-IV Axis I and Axis II disorders in a sample of male forensic psychiatric patients in the Netherlands. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27, 233-248.
24. Hildebrand, M., de Ruiter, C., & Nijman, H. (2004). PCL-R psychopathy predicts disruptive behavior among male offenders in a Dutch forensic psychiatric hospital. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 13-29.
25. Hildebrand, M., de Ruiter, C., & de Vogel, V. (2004). Psychopathy and sexual deviance in treated rapists: Association with (sexual) recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 1-24.
26. Hildebrand, M., de Ruiter, C. de Vogel, V., & van der Wolf, P. (2002). Reliability and factor structure of the Dutch language version of Hare’s Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1, 139-154.
27. Hilterman, E. (2001). Statische vergelijking van tijdens verlof recidiverende en niet-recidiverende tbs-gestelden [Static comparison of recidivating and non-recidivating tbs patients during leave]. Proces, 80, 121-127.
28. Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1999). Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (Version 3). Vancouver: British Columbia Institute against Family Violence.
29. Kropp, P. R., & Hart, S. D. (2000). The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 101-118.
30. Laws, D. R., Hudson, S. M., & Ward, T. (2000). Remaking relapse prevention: A sourcebook. London: Sage.
31. Lidz, C. W., Mulvey, E. P., & Gardner, W. (1993). The accuracy of predictions of violence to others. Journal of the American Medical Association, 269, 1007-1011.
32. Litwack, T. (2001). Actuarial versus clinical assessments of dangerousness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 409-443.
33. McNiel, D.E., & Binder, R.L. (1995). Correlates of accuracy in the assessment of psychiatric inpatients’ risk of violence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 901-906.
34. Monahan, J. (1981). The clinical prediction of violent behavior. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
35. Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P. S., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P., Roth, L. H., Grisso, T., & Banks, S. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. Oxford: Oxford University press.
36. Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783-792.
37. Nicholls, T. L. (2001). Violence risk assessment with female NCRMD acquittees: Validity of the HCR-20 and PCL-SV. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Vancouver, British Columbia: Simon Fraser University.
38. MISSING IN DOCUMENTNiemantsverdriet, J. R. (1993). Achteraf bezien: Over het evalueren van terbeschikkingstellingen [Seen in retrospect: About the evaluation of tbs-orders]. Academisch proefschrift, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen. Utrecht: Elinkwijk.
39. Philipse, M., van Erven, T., & Peters, J. (2002). Risicotaxatie in de tbs. Van geloof naar empirie [Risk assessment in the tbs. From belief to empiricism]. Justitiële Verkenningen, 28, 77-93.
40. Philipse, M., de Ruiter, C., Hildebrand, M., & Bouman, Y. (2000). HCR-20. Beoordelen van het risico van gewelddadig gedrag. Versie 2 [HCR-20. Assessment of the risk of violent behavior. Version 2]. Nijmegen /Utrecht: Prof. Mr. W.P.J. Pompestichting /Dr. Henri van der Hoeven Stichting.
41. Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
42. Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.
43. de Ruiter, C., & Greeven, P. G. J. (2000). Personality disorders in a Dutch forensic psychiatric sample: Convergence of interview and self-report measures. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 162-170.
44. Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., & Sewell, K. W. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 203-215.
45. Schmidt, P., & Wytte, A. D. (1988). Predicting recidivism using survival models. New York: Springer.
46. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlation: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
47. Swanson, J. W., Swartz, M. S., Borum, R., Hiday, V. A., Wagner, H. R., & Burns, B. J. (2000). Involuntary out-patient commitment and reduction of violent behavior in persons with severe mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 324-331.
48. van Emmerik, J. L., & Brouwers, M. (2001). De terbeschikkingstelling in maat en getal: Een beschrijving van de tbspopulatie in de periode 1995-2000 [The tbs-order in numbers and figures. A description of the tbs population in the period 1995-2000]. Ministerie van Justitie, The Hague: Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen.
49. Vertommen, H., Verheul, R., de Ruiter, C., & Hildebrand, M. (2002). De herziene versie van Hare’s Psychopathie Checklist [Revised version of Hare’s Psychopathy Checklist]. Lisse: Swets Test Publishers.
50. Vida, S. (1997). AccuROC nonparametric receiver operating characteristic analysis (version 2.5) [Computer software]. Quebec, Montreal: Accumetric Corporation.
51. Vogel, V. de, & Ruiter, C. de (2004). Differences between clinicians and researchers in assessing risk of violence in forensic psychiatric patients. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 15, 145-164.
52. Vogel, V. de, & Ruiter, C. de. (in preparation). Structured Professional Judgment of violence risk in forensic clinical practice: A prospective study into the predictive validity of the Dutch HCR-20.
53. Vogel, V. de, Ruiter, C. de, Beek, D. van, & Mead, G. (2004). Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 235-251.
54. Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997a). Assessing risk of violence to others. In C.D. Webster, & A. Jackson (Eds.), Impulsivity: Theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 251-272). New York: The Guilford Press.
55. Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S.D. (1997b). HCR-20. Assessing the risk of violence. Version 2. Burnaby, British Columbia: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute. Simon Fraser University.