A call for greater editorial responsibilities

Science Editing

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 89-91

  Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A ^a  

^a KAGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016306637     PISSN: 22888063     EISSN: 22887474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.6087/kcse.50     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Teixeira da Silva JA. Responsibilities and rights of authors, peer reviewers, editors and publishers: a status quo inquiry and assessment. Asian Australas J Plant Sci Biotechnol 2013;7(Special Issue 1):6-15
2. Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobranszki J, Van PT, et al. Corresponding authors: rules, responsibilities and risks. Asian Australas J Plant Sci Biotechnol 2013;7(Special Issue 1):16-20
3. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Defining the role of authors and contributors [Internet]. [place unknown]: International Committee of Medical Journal Editors; 2015 [cited 2015 July 31]. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles and responsibilities/definingthe role of authors and contributors.html
4. Committee on Publication Ethics. About COPE [Internet]. [place unknown]: Committee on Publication Ethics; 2015 [cited 2015 July 31]. Available from: http://publicationethics.org/about
5. Committee on Publication Ethics. Members [Internet]. [place unknown]: Committee on Publication Ethics; 2015 [cited 2015 July 31]. Available from: http://publicationethics.org/members
6. Committee on Publication Ethics. Code of conduct and best practice guidelines for journal editors [Internet]. [place unknown]: Committee on Publication Ethics; 2011 [cited 2015 July 31]. Available from: http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf
7. Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobranszki J. Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review. Account Res 2015;22:22-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.899909
8. Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobranszki J. How authorship is defined by multiple publishing organizations and STM publishers. Account Res 2015 Jul 20 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2015.1047927
9. Wager E. Why are retractions so difficult? Sci Ed 2015;2:32-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.6087/kcse.34
10. Teixeira da Silva JA. The importance of retractions and the need to correct the downstream literature. J Sci Explor 2015; 29:353-6
11. Teixeira da Silva JA. Debunking post-publication peer review: what it is and what it's not. Int J Educ Inf Technol 2015; in press
12. Giorgini V, Mecca JT, Gibson C, et al. Researcher perceptions of ethical guidelines and codes of conduct. Account Res 2015;22:123-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.955607
13. Caplan AL. The problem of publication-pollution denialism. Mayo Clin Proc 2015;90:565-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.02.017