Change in European care arrangements

Care and Social Integration in European Societies

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 3-19

  Pfau Effinger, Birgit ^a   Geissler, Birgit ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016286568     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Ballarin, P., Euler, C., Le Feuvre, N. and Raevaara, E. (2003) Women in the European Union (www.helsinki.fi/science/xantippa/wee/wee20.html).
2. Bang, H., Jensen, P. and Pfau-Effinger, B. (2000) ‘Gender and European welfare states: context, structure, agency’, in S. Duncan and B. Pfau-Effinger (eds) Gender, work and culture in the European Union, London/New York: Routledge, pp 115-42.
3. Cousins, C. (1998) ‘Social exclusion in Europe: paradigms of social disadvantage in Germany, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom’, Policy & Politics, vol 26, no 2, pp 127-46.
4. Dale, A. and Holdsworth, C. (1997) ‘Why don’t minority ethnic women in Britain work part-time’, in C. Fagan and J. O’Reilly (eds) Parttime perspectives, London: Routledge, pp 77-95.
5. Dalla Costa, M. and James, S. (1973) Die Macht der Frauen und der Umsturz der Gesellschaft, Berlin: Merve.
6. Daly, M. and Lewis, J. (1998) ‘Introduction: conceptualising social care in the context of welfare state restructuring’, in J. Lewis (ed) Gender, social care and welfare state restructuring in Europe, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp 86-103.
7. Daly, M. and Lewis, J. (2000) ‘The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states’, British Journal of Sociology, vol 51, no 2, pp 281-98.
8. Duncan, S. and Smith, D. (2002) ‘Family geographies and gender cultures’, Social Policy and Society, vol 1, no 1, pp 21-34.
9. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The three worlds of welfare capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social foundations of postindustrial economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1993) ‘Obligations of kinship in contemporary Britain, is there normative agreement?’, British Journal of Sociology, vol 42, no 3, pp 345-67.
12. Fraser, N. and Gordon, L. (1994) ‘“Dependency” demystified: inscriptions of power in a keyword of the welfare state’, Social Politics, vol 1, no 1, pp 4-31.
13. Gather, C., Geissler, B. and Rerrich, M.S. (eds) (2002) Weltmarkt Privathaushalt. Bezahlte Haushaltsarbeit im globalen Wandel, Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
14. Geissler, B. (2002a) ‘Die (Un-)Abhängigkeit in der Ehe und das Bürgerrecht auf care. Überlegungen zur gender-Gerechtigkeit im Wohlfahrtsstaat’, in K. Gottschall and B. Pfau-Effinger (eds) Zukunft der Arbeit und Geschlecht, Opladen: Leske und Budrich, pp 183-206.
15. Geissler, B. (2002b) ‘Die Dienstleistungslücke im Haushalt. Der neue Bedarf nach Dienstleistungen und die Handlungslogik der privaten Arbeit’, in C. Gather, B. Geissler and M.S. Rerrich (eds) Weltmarkt Privathaushalt. Bezahlte Haushaltsarbeit im globalen Wandel, Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, pp 30-49.
16. Geissler, B. and Pfau-Effinger, B. (1989) ‘Neuere Lebensentwürfe von Frauen und das Recht auf geschützte Teilzeitarbeit’, in S. Habenicht-Erenler (ed) Frauenzeit am Arbeitsmarkt. Perspektiven einer Arbeitszeitpolitik für Frauen, Loccum: Akademie Verlag, pp 89-119.
17. Gender and Society (2002) Special issue: Global perspectives on gender and carework, vol 17, no 2.
18. Gerhard, U. (1995) ‘Frauenbewegung und Ehekritik - Der Beitrag der Frauenbewegung zu sozialem Wandel’, in B. Nauck and C. Onnen-Isemann (eds) Familie im Brennpunkt von Wissenschaft und Forschung, Neuwied: Luchterhand, pp 59-72.
19. Gerhard, U. (2003) ‘“Ein Raum der Freiheit?” - Ansätze und Perspektiven des Konzepts europäischer Bürgerrechte’, Feministische Studien, vol 21, no 1, pp 71-82.
20. Hochschild, A.R. (1995) ‘The culture of politics: traditional, postmodern, cold-modern and warm-modern ideals of care’, Social Politics, vol 2, no 3, pp 331-46.
21. Hochschild, A.R. (1996) ‘The emotional geography of work and family life’, in L. Morris and S. Lyon (eds) Gender relations in public and private, London: Macmillan, pp 13-32.
22. Hochschild, A.R. (2000) ‘Global care chains and emotional surplus value’, in W. Hutton and A. Giddens (eds) On the edge: Living with global capitalism, London: Cape, pp 130-46.
23. Knijn, T. and Kremer, M. (1997) ‘Gender and the caring dimension of the welfare states: towards inclusive citizenship’, Social Politics, vol 4, no 3, pp 328-61.
24. Kramer, H. (1981) ‘Hausarbeit und taylorisierte Arbeit’, in Institut fur Sozialforschung (ed) Gesellschaftliche Arbeit und Rationalisierung, Leviathan-Sonderheft, no 4, Opladen: Westdeutscher V, pp 136-51.
25. Kröger, T. (2001) Comparative research on social care: The state of the art, SOCCARE Project Report 1, Brussels: European Commission.
26. Leira, A. (1992) Models of motherhood: Welfare state policy and Scandinavian experiences of everyday practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Lewis, J. (1992) ‘Gender and the development of welfare regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy, vol 2, no 3, pp 159-73.
28. Lewis, J. and Ostner, I. (1994) Gender and the evolution of European social policies (Arbeitspapier 4/94), Bremen: Zentrum fur Sozialpolitik.
29. Marshall, T.H. (1964) Class, citizenship and social development, Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
30. Meyer, T. (1998) ‘Retrenchment, reproduction, modernization: pension politics and the decline of the German breadwinner model’, European Journal of Social Policy, vol 8, pp 212-27.
31. Mósesdóttir, L. (2000) The interplay between gender, markets and the state in Sweden, Germany and the United States, Aldershot: Ashgate.
32. O’Connor, J. (1996) ‘From women in the welfare state to gendering welfare state regimes’, Current Sociology, vol 44, no 2, pp 102-18.
33. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2000) Employment outlook, Paris: OECD.
34. Pfau-Effinger, B. (1998) ‘Gender cultures and the gender arrangement - a theoretical framework for cross-national comparisons on gender’, in S. Duncan (ed) The spatiality of gender. Special issue of Innovation, European Journal of Social Sciences, vol 11, no 2, pp 147-66.
35. Pfau-Effinger, B. (1999) ‘Change of family policies in the socio-cultural context of European Societies’, Comparative Social Research, vol 18, pp 135-60.
36. Pfau-Effinger, B. (2001) ‘Wandel wohlfahrtsstaatlicher Geschlechterpolitiken im soziokulturellen Kontext’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, vol 41, no 3, pp 488-511.
37. Pfau-Effinger, B. (2004a) Culture, welfare state and women’s work in Europe, Aldershot:Ashgate.
38. Pfau-Effinger, B. (2004b) ‘Historical paths of the male breadwinner family model - explanation for cross-national differences’, British Journal for Sociology, vol 55, no 3, pp 177-99.
39. Pfau-Effinger, B. (2004c) Informal employment in a comparative perspective in six EU member states - Denmark, Finland, Germany, Great Britain, Poland and Spain, Paper presented at the Fourth Workshop of the 5th EU Framework Programme Research Project, ‘Formal and Informal Work in Europe (FIWE): A comparative analysis of their changing relationship and their impact on social integration’, 14-15 May 2004, Krakow.
40. Pfau-Effinger, B. (2004d) ‘The concept of informal work’, in B. Pfau-Effinger (ed) Review of Literature on Formal and InformalWork in Europe, Discussion Paper no 2, 5th EU Framework Research Project, ‘Formal and Informal Work in Europe (FIWE)’, Centre for Globalisation and Governance, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, pp 4-18.
41. Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005a) ‘Culture and welfare state policies: reflections on a complex interrelation’, Journal of Social Policy, vol 34, no 1, pp 118.
42. Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005b) ‘Welfare state policies and development of care arrangements’, European Societies, vol 7, no 3, pp 321-41.
43. Pfau-Effinger, B. and Geissler, B. (2002) ‘Cultural change and family policies in East and West Germany’, in A. Carling, S. Duncan and R. Edwards (eds) Analysing families: Morality and rationality in policy and practice, London/New York: Routledge.
44. Pierson, P (2001) ‘Post-industrial pressures on the mature welfare states’, in P. Pierson (ed) The new politics of the welfare state, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 80-106.
45. Senghaas-Knobloch, E. (1999) Das Problem der “Angewiesenheit” in der postindustriellen Gesellschaft, Artec paper 75, Universität Bremen.
46. Siim, B. (2000) Gender and citizenship: Politics and agency in France, Britain and Denmark, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Thomas, C. (1993) ‘De-constructing concepts of care’, Sociology, vol 27, no 4, pp 649-69.
48. Tronto, J. (1996) ‘Politics of care: Fürsorge und Wohlfahrt’, Transit -Europäische Revue, vol 7, no 12, pp 142-53.
49. Ungerson, C. (1997) ‘Social politics and the commodification of care’, Social Politics, vol 4, no 3, pp 362-81.
50. Waerness, K. (2000) ‘Fürsorgerationalität’, in C. Eckart and E. Senghaas-Knobloch (ed) Fürsorge, Anerkennung, Arbeit, Feministische Studien, vol 18, pp 54-66.