To act or not to act: Responses to electronic health record prompts by family medicine clinicians

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 275-280

  Zazove, Philip ^a   McKee, Michael ^a   Schleicher, Lauren ^a   Green, Lee ^b   Kileny, Paul ^c   Rapai, Mary ^a   Mulhem, Elie ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d OAKLAND UNIVERSITY WILLIAM BEAUMONT SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Best practice alerts; EHR; Electronic prompts

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FAMILY MEDICINE; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; STANDARDIZATION; WORKFLOW; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; CLINICAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE;

ADULT; AGED; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS';

EID: 85016259924     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocw178     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. HealthIT.gov. Benefits of EHRs: Improved Diagnostic & Patient Outcomes. http://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/improved-diag nostics-patient-outcomes. Accessed August 18, 2016.
2. Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:47-55.
3. Epic. http://www.epic.com. Accessed November 20, 2016.
4. Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Fleming C, Beil T. Screening adults aged 50 years or older for hearing loss: a review of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:347-55.
5. Schraagen JM, Klein G, Hoffman RR. The macrocognition framework of naturalistic decision-making. In: JM Schraagen, LG Militello, T Ormerod, eds. Naturalistic Decision-Making and Macrocognition. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing; 2008: 3-25.
6. Potworowski G, Green L. Cognitive Task Analysis: Methods to Improve Patient-Centered Medical Home Models by Understanding and Leveraging Its KnowledgeWork. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013.
7. Wei J, Salvendy G. The cognitive task analysis methods for job and task design: review and reappraisal. Behav Inform Technol. 2004;23:273-99.
8. Crandall B, Klein GA, Hoffman RR. Working Minds: A Practitioner's Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006.
9. Gorson S, Gill R. Naturalistic decisionmaking. In: C Zsambok,G Klein, eds. Cognitive Task Analysis.Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates; 1997.
10. Militello LG, Hutton RJ. Applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA): a practitioner's toolkit for understanding cognitive task demands. Ergonomics. 1998;41:1618-41.
11. Croskerry P. A universal model of diagnostic reasoning. Acad Med. 2009;84:1022-28.
12. Kahneman D. Thinking Fast, Thinking Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux; 2011.
13. Katerndahl D, Parchman M, Wood R. Trends in the perceived complexity of primary health care: a secondary analysis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16:1002-08.
14. Agrawal Y, Platz EA, Niparko JK. Prevalence of hearing loss and differences by demographic characteristics among US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1522-30.
15. Lin FR, Niparko JK, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss prevalence in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1851-52.
16. Newman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, Hug GA. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear Hear. 1990;11:430-33.
17. Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.
18. Chen LM, Farwell WR, Jha AK. Primary care visit duration and quality: does good care take longer? Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1866-72.
19. Wallhagen MI, Strawbridge WJ, Shema SJ. The relationship between hearing impairment and cognitive function: a 5-year longitudinal study. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2008;1:80-86.
20. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1999.
21. Green L, Mehr DR. What alters physicians' decisions to admit to the coronary care unit? J Fam Pract. 1997;45:219-26.
22. Blanchfield BB, Feldman JJ, Dunbar JL, Gardner EN. The severely to profoundly hearing-impaired population in the United States: prevalence estimates and demographics. J Am Acad Audiol. 2001;12:183-89.
23. National Council on Aging. The consequences of untreated hearing loss in older persons. ORL Head Neck Nurs. 2000;18:12-16.
24. Field MJ, Lohr KN. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1990.
25. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318:527-30.
26. Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12:573-76.