Erratum to: A survival guide to Landsat preprocessing (Ecology, (2017), 98, 4, (920-932), 10.1002/ecy.1730);A survival guide to Landsat preprocessing

Ecology

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 920-932

  Young, Nicholas E ^a   Anderson, Ryan S ^a   Chignell, Stephen M ^a   Vorster, Anthony G ^a   Lawrence, Rick ^b   Evangelista, Paul H ^a  

^a Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^b MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

atmospheric correction; change detection; decision tree; ecology; image; normalization; radiometric correction; remote sensing; review; satellite; topographic correction; workflow

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LANDSAT; RADIOMETRIC SURVEY; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SOLAR RADIATION; SURVIVAL; TOPOGRAPHIC EFFECT;

ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; PROCEDURES; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

EID: 85016253944     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: 19399170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3508     Document Type: Erratum

References (78)

1. Adhikari, H., J. Heiskanen, E. E. Maeda, and P. K. E. Pellikka. 2015. Does topographic normalization of landsat images improve fractional tree cover mapping in tropical mountains? ISPRS – International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-7/ W3:261–267.
2. Anderson, M. C., R. G. Allen, A. Morse, and W. P. Kustas. 2012. Use of Landsat thermal imagery in monitoring evapotranspiration and managing water resources. Remote Sensing of Environment 122:50–65.
3. Avitabile, V., A. Baccini, M. A. Friedl, and C. Schmullius. 2012. Capabilities and limitations of Landsat and land cover data for aboveground woody biomass estimation of Uganda. Remote Sensing of Environment 117:366–380.
4. Baker, C., R. Lawrence, C. Montagne, and D. Patten. 2006. Mapping wetlands and riparian areas using landsat etm+ imagery and decision-tree-based models. Wetlands 26:465–474.
5. Bannari, A., D. Morin, F. Bonn, and A. R. Huete. 1995. A review of vegetation indices. Remote Sensing Reviews 13:95–120.
6. Bao, N. S., A. M. Lechner, A. Fletcher, A. Mellor, D. Mulligan, and Z. K. Bai. 2012. Comparison of relative radiometric normalization methods using pseudo-invariant features for change detection studies in rural and urban landscapes. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 6:63571–63578.
7. Bodart, C., H. Eva, R. Beuchle, R. Raši, D. Simonetti, H.-J. Stibig, A. Brink, E. Lindquist, and F. Achard. 2011. Pre-processing of a sample of multi-scene and multi-date Landsat imagery used to monitor forest cover changes over the tropics. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 66:555–563.
8. Brown, L. G. 1992. A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 24:325–376.
9. Chander, G., B. L. Markham, and D. L. Helder. 2009. Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sensing of Environment 113:893–903.
10. Chavez, P. S. 1988. An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sensing of Environment 24:459–479.
11. Chen, X., L. Vierling, and D. Deering. 2005. A simple and effective radiometric correction method to improve landscape change detection across sensors and across time. Remote Sensing of Environment 98:63–79.
12. Cohen, W. B., and S. N. Goward. 2004. Landsat's role in ecological applications of remote sensing. BioScience 54:535–545.
13. Colby, J. D. 1991. Topographic normalization in rugged terrain. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 57:531–537.
14. Conese, C., M. A. Gilabert, F. Maselli, and L. Bottai. 1993. Topographic normalization of TM scenes through the use of an atmospheric correction method and digital terrain models. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 59:1745–1753.
15. Du, Y., P. M. Teillet, and J. Cihlar. 2002. Radiometric normalization of multitemporal high-resolution satellite images with quality control for land cover change detection. Remote Sensing of Environment 82:123–134.
16. Evangelista, P. H., T. J. Stohlgren, J. T. Morisette, and S. Kumar. 2009. Mapping invasive tamarisk (Tamarix): a comparison of single-scene and time-series analyses of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing 1:519–533.
17. Gao, Y., and W. Zhang. 2009. LULC classification and topographic correction of Landsat-7 ETM+ imagery in the Yangjia River Watershed: the influence of DEM resolution. Sensors 9:1980–1995.
18. Hale, S. R., and B. N. Rock. 2003. Impact of topographic normalization on land-cover classification accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 69:785–791.
19. Hansen, M. C., and T. R. Loveland. 2012. A review of large area monitoring of land cover change using Landsat data. Remote Sensing of Environment 122:66–74.
20. Hantson, S., and E. Chuvieco. 2011. Evaluation of different topographic correction methods for Landsat imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 13:691–700.
21. He, K. S., B. A. Bradley, A. F. Cord, D. Rocchini, M.-N. Tuanmu, S. Schmidtlein, W. Turner, M. Wegmann, and N. Pettorelli. 2015. Will remote sensing shape the next generation of species distribution models? Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 1:4–18.
22. Holben, B., and C. Justice. 1981. An examination of spectral band ratioing to reduce the topographic effect on remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2:115–133.
23. Holden, C. E., and C. E. Woodcock. 2016. An analysis of Landsat 7 and Landsat 8 underflight data and the implications for time series investigations. Remote Sensing of Environment 185:16–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.052
24. Huete, A., H. Liu, W. Batchily, and V. Leeuwen. 1997. A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment 59:440–451.
25. Jackson, R. D., and A. R. Huete. 1991. Interpreting vegetation indices. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 11:185–200.
26. Jones, H. G., and R. A. Vaughan. 2010. Remote sensing of vegetation: principles, techniques, and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, UK.
27. Kennedy, R. E., P. A. Townsend, J. E. Gross, W. B. Cohen, P. Bolstad, Y. Q. Wang, and P. Adams. 2009. Remote sensing change detection tools for natural resource managers: understanding concepts and tradeoffs in the design of landscape monitoring projects. Remote Sensing of Environment 113:1382–1396.
28. Kennedy, R. E., et al. 2014. Bringing an ecological view of change to Landsat-based remote sensing. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12:339–346.
29. Laraby, K. 2016. Landsat surface temperature product: global validation and cloud analysis. Landsat Science Team 2016 Winter Meeting, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA. Presentation.
30. Lawrence, R. L., and C. J. Moran. 2015. The AmericaView classification methods accuracy comparison project: a rigorous approach for model selection. Remote Sensing of Environment 170:115–120.
31. Leprieur, C. E., J. M. Durand, and J. L. Peyron. 1988. Influence of topography on forest reflectance using Landsat Thematic Mapper and digital terrain data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54:491–496.
32. Li, J., M. Menenti, A. Mousivand, and S. M. Luthi. 2014. Non-vegetated playa morphodynamics using multi-temporal Landsat imagery in a semi-arid endorheic basin: Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia. Remote Sensing 6:10131–10151.
33. Loveland, T. R., and J. L. Dwyer. 2012. Landsat: building a strong future. Remote Sensing of Environment 122:22–29.
34. Lozano, F. J., S. Suárez-Seoane, and E. de Luis. 2007. Assessment of several spectral indices derived from multi-temporal Landsat data for fire occurrence probability modelling. Remote Sensing of Environment 107:533–544.
35. Lu, D., P. Mausel, E. Brondizio, and E. Moran. 2002. Assessment of atmospheric correction methods for Landsat TM data applicable to Amazon basin LBA research. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23:2651–2671.
36. Markham, B. L., and D. L. Helder. 2012. Forty-year calibrated record of earth-reflected radiance from Landsat: a review. Remote Sensing of Environment 122:30–40.
37. Masek, J. G., E. F. Vermote, N. E. Saleous, R. Wolfe, F. G. Hall, K. F. Huemmrich, F. Gao, J. Kutler, and T.-K. Lim. 2006. A Landsat surface reflectance dataset for North America, 1990–2000. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 3:68–72.
38. Meyer, P., K. I. Itten, T. Kellenberger, S. Sandmeier, and R. Sandmeier. 1993. Radiometric corrections of topographically induced effects on Landsat TM data in an alpine environment. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 48:17–28.
39. Miller, H., L. Richardson, N. Sexton, L. Koontz, J. Loomis, S. Koontz, and C. Hermans. 2011. The users, uses, and value of Landsat and other Moderate-Resolution Satellite Imagery in the United States. Executive report. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virigina, USA.
40. Minnaert, M. 1941. The reciprocity principle in lunar photometry. Astrophysical Journal 93:403–410.
41. Pasquarella, V. J., C. E. Holden, L. Kaufman, and C. E. Woodcock. 2016. From imagery to ecology: leveraging time series of all available Landsat observations to map and monitor ecosystem state and dynamics. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 2:152–170.
42. Pettorelli, N., W. F. Laurance, T. G. O'Brien, M. Wegmann, H. Nagendra, and W. Turner. 2014. Satellite remote sensing for applied ecologists: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Applied Ecology 51:839–848.
43. Pinty, B., and M. M. Verstraete. 1992. GEMI: a non-linear index to monitor global vegetation from satellites. Vegetatio 101:15–20.
44. Riaño, D., E. Chuvieco, J. Salas, and I. Aguado. 2003. Assessment of different topographic corrections in Landsat-TM data for mapping vegetation types (2003). IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41:1056–1061.
45. Richter, R., T. Kellenberger, and H. Kaufmann. 2009. Comparison of topographic correction methods. Remote Sensing 1:184–196.
46. Roy, D. P., J. Ju, K. Kline, P. L. Scaramuzza, V. Kovalskyy, M. Hansen, T. R. Loveland, E. Vermote, and C. Zhang. 2010. Web-enabled Landsat Data (WELD): Landsat ETM+ composited mosaics of the conterminous United States. Remote Sensing of Environment 114:35–49.
47. Roy, D. P., V. Kovalskyy, H. K. Zhang, E. F. Vermote, L. Yan, S. S. Kumar, and A. Egorov. 2016. Characterization of Landsat-7 to Landsat-8 reflective wavelength and normalized difference vegetation index continuity. Remote Sensing of Environment 185:57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.024
48. Roy, D. P., et al. 2014. Landsat-8: science and product vision for terrestrial global change research. Remote Sensing of Environment 145:154–172.
49. Savage, S. L., R. L. Lawrence, and J. R. Squires. 2015. Predicting relative species composition within mixed conifer forest pixels using zero-inflated models and Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 171:326–336.
50. Schaepman-Strub, G., M. E. Schaepman, T. H. Painter, S. Dangel, and J. V. Martonchik. 2006. Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing—definitions and case studies. Remote Sensing of Environment 103:27–42.
51. Schott, J. R., C. Salvaggio, and W. J. Volchok. 1988. Radiometric scene normalization using pseudoinvariant features. Remote Sensing of Environment 26:1–16.
52. Schowengerdt, R. A. 2007. Remote sensing: models and methods for image processing. Third edition. Elsevier Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
53. Schroeder, T. A., W. B. Cohen, C. Song, M. J. Canty, and Z. Yang. 2006. Radiometric correction of multi-temporal Landsat data for characterization of early successional forest patterns in western Oregon. Remote Sensing of Environment 103:16–26.
54. Shepherd, J. D., and J. R. Dymond. 2003. Correcting satellite imagery for the variance of reflectance and illumination with topography. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24:3503–3514.
55. Sola, I., M. González-Audícana, and J. Álvarez-Mozos. 2016. Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods. Remote Sensing of Environment 184:247–262.
56. Song, C., C. E. Woodcock, K. C. Seto, M. P. Lenney, and S. A. Macomber. 2001. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects? Remote Sensing of Environment 75:230–244.
57. Storey, J., D. P. Roy, J. Masek, F. Gascon, J. Dwyer, and M. Choate. 2016. A note on the temporary misregistration of Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Sentinel-2 Multi Spectral Instrument (MSI) imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 186:121–122.
58. Strahler, A. H., C. E. Woodcock, and J. A. Smith. 1986. On the nature of models in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 20:121–139.
59. Sun, L., and K. Schulz. 2015. The improvement of land cover classification by thermal remote sensing. Remote Sensing 7:8368–8390.
60. Sundaresan, A., P. K. Varshney, and M. K. Arora. 2007. Robustness of change detection algorithms in the presence of registration errors. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 73:375–383.
61. Teillet, P. M., B. Guindon, and D. G. Goodenough. 1982. On the slope-aspect correction of multispectral scanner data. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 8:84–106.
62. Turner, W., et al. 2015. Free and open-access satellite data are key to biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 182:173–176.
63. U.S. Geological Survey. 2014. Landsat 8 data users handbook. USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.
64. U.S. Geological Survey. 2015a. What are the band designations for the Landsat satellites? https://landsat.usgs.gov/what-are-band-designations-landsat-satellites
65. U.S. Geological Survey. 2015b. USGS EarthExplorer. http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov
66. U.S. Geological Survey. 2015c. Landsat processing details. https://landsat.usgs.gov/Landsat-Processing-Details
67. U.S. Geological Survey. 2015d. Landsat surface reflectance high level data products. http://landsat.usgs.gov/CDR_LSR.php
68. U.S. Geological Survey. 2016a. User guide: Earth resources observation and science (EROS) center science processing architecture (ESPA) on demand interface, version 3.3. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70057873
69. U.S. Geological Survey. 2016b. Product guide: Landsat surface reflectance-derived spectral indices. Version 2.7. U.S. Geological Survey, EROS Data Center. https://landsat.usgs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/si_product_guide.pdf
70. U.S. Geological Survey. 2016c. Landsat collections. https://landsat.usgs.gov/landsat-collections
71. U.S. Geological Survey. 2016d. ESPA ordering interface. http://espa.cr.usgs.gov
72. Vanonckelen, S., S. Lhermitte, and A. Van Rompaey. 2013. The effect of atmospheric and topographic correction methods on land cover classification accuracy. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 24:9–21.
73. Vogelmann, J. E., A. L. Gallant, H. Shi, and Z. Zhu. 2016. Perspectives on monitoring gradual change across the continuity of Landsat sensors using time-series data. Remote Sensing of Environment 185:258–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.060
74. Vuolo, F., M. Mattiuzzi, and C. Atzberger. 2015. Comparison of the Landsat Surface Reflectance Climate Data Record (CDR) and manually atmospherically corrected data in a semi-arid European study area. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 42:1–10.
75. Wang, K., S. E. Franklin, X. Guo, and M. Cattet. 2010. Remote sensing of ecology, biodiversity and conservation: a review from the perspective of remote sensing specialists. Sensors 10:9647–9667.
76. Willis, K. S. 2015. Remote sensing change detection for ecological monitoring in United States protected areas. Biological Conservation 182:233–242.
77. Wulder, M. A., J. G. Masek, W. B. Cohen, T. R. Loveland, and C. E. Woodcock. 2012. Opening the archive: How free data has enabled the science and monitoring promise of Landsat. Remote Sensing of Environment 122:2–10.
78. Zitová, B., and J. Flusser. 2003. Image registration methods: a survey. Image and Vision Computing 21:977–1000.