The enron fallout: Was enron an accounting failure?

Managerial Finance

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 5-28

  Richard Baker, C ^a   Hayes, Rick ^b  

^a ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Credit worthiness; Deregulation; Financial analysis; SPEs; Transparency

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016225162     PISSN: 03074358     EISSN: 17587743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/03074350510769839     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. AICPA (1997) Statement of Position 97-2: Software Revenue Recognition, New York: AICPA.
2. AICPA (1968) Accounting Principles Board Statement No. 4, New York: AICPA.
3. Associated Press (2002) ‘Energy company withheld gas supplies to California’, The New York Times (September 23), http://www.nytimes.comlaponlinelbusiness/AP-N atural-Gas-Prices.html.
4. Baker, C.R. (1992) ‘A guide to project financing’, Journal of Bank Cost and Management (Fall), pp. 5-13.
5. Barboza, D. (2002) ‘Enron offered management aid to companies’, New York Times (April 10), 2002, p. CL
6. Bass, C.E. (2000) ‘Andersen memo’, US House of Representatives (February), http://en-ergycommittee.house.gov.
7. Batteles, S.J. (1999) ‘Electricity generation in the manufacturing sector: a historical per-spective’, 20th Annual North American Conference of the United States Association for Energy Economics, (August), http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/efficiency/iaee99final.htm.
8. BBC (2002) ‘Enron who’s who: Lord Wakeham.’ BBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in depth/business/2002/enron/26.stm.
9. Broder J. (2002) ‘Cali fornia power failures linked to energy companies’, The New York Times, (September 18), http://www.nytimes.comI2002/09/18/national/18ENER.html.
10. Cohn, L. (2002) ‘Peter Fitzgerald’s different drummer’, Business Week (April 22), p. 91.
11. Duncan, D. (2001) ‘Andersen memo’, US House of Representatives (October 15), http://energycommittee.house.gov
12. EITF (1985) Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 85-1: Classifying Notes Received for Capital, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
13. EITF (1990) Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 90-15: Impact of Non substantive Lessors, Residual Value Guarantees, and Other Provisions in Leastng Transactions, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
14. EITF (1996) Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-21: Implementation Issues in Ac-counting for Leasing Transactions Involving Special-Purpose Entities, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
15. EITF (1998) Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 98-10: Accounting for Contracts Involved in Energy Tradtng and Risk Management Activities, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
16. EITF (2002) Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. D-14: Transactions Involving Special-Purpose Entities, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
17. Emshwiller, J. (2002) ‘Enron’s SPE transactions raise questions on roles of executives’, The Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/artic1e/O,,SB10333332677099l5353,00.html?mod=home whats newsus.
18. Emshwiller, J.R., Smith, R., Sidel R. and Weil, I. (2001) ‘Enron cuts profit data of 4 years by 20% ’, Wall Street Journal (November 9), p. A-3.
19. Enron Corp. (1996) ‘Enron and Portland General announce pro-competitive merger’, Enron Corp. Press Release (July 22), http://www.enron.com/corp/pressroom/releases/1996Z89pge.html.
20. Enron Corp. (2001) ‘Enron, Sierra Pacific terminate agreement to sell Portland General Electric’, April 26, Enron Corp. Press Release, http://www.enron.com/corp/pressroom/re-leases/2001/ene/37-PGETermination-04-26-01LTR.html.
21. Enlon Corp. (2002) ‘News and pressroom’, Enron.com, http://www.enron.com/press-room.
22. FASB (1975) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5: Accountingfor Contin-gencies, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
23. FASB (1976) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13: Accounting for Leases, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
24. FASB (1978) Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 1: Objectives of Financial Reporting for Business Enterprises, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
25. FASB (1980) Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2: Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
26. FASB (1981a) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 47: Disclosure of LongTerm Obligations, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
27. FASB (1981b) FASB Interpretation No. 34: Disclosure of Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
28. FASB (1982) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 57: Related Party Disclosures, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
29. FASB (1984) Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 5: Recognition and Meas-urement in Financial Statements of Business Enterprises, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
30. FASB (1987) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 94: Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
31. FASB (1991) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107: Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
32. FASB (1993) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
33. FASB (1997). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131: Disclosures About Segments of An Enterprise and Related Information, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
34. FASB (1998). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133: Accountingfor De-rivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
35. FASB (2000) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140: Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
36. FASB (2002) Proposal for a New Agenda Project: Issues Re tated to The Recognition of Revenues and Liabilities, Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
37. Hartgraves, A. and Bentson, G. (2002) ‘The evolving accounting standards for special pur-pose entities and consolidations’, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 245-258.
38. Hecker, J.A. (2001) ‘Andetsen memo subj ect client accounting inquiry’, US House of Representatives, (August 21), http://energycommittee.house.gov.
39. Jenkins, E.L. (2002) ‘Testimony before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection of the US House of Reptesentatives Committee on Energy and Commerce’, US House of Representatives, (February 14).
40. Kahn, J. and Gerth, I. (2001) ‘Collapse of Enron May Reshape the Battlefield of Deregu-lation’, New York Times, (December 4), http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/04/busi-ness/04DERE.html.
41. Labaton, S. (2002a) ‘Exemption won in 1997 set stage for Enron woes’, The New York Times, (January 23), http://www.nytimes.com/2002/0 1123/business/23 EXEM.html.
42. Labaton, S. (2002b) ‘Hurdles seen for audit changes’, The New York Times, (January 24), http://www.nytimes.com/2002/0 1/24/business.
43. Miller, R. and Pashkoff, P. (2002) ‘Regulations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’, Journal of Accountancy, (October), Vol. 194, No. 4, pp. 33-37.
44. Noms, F. and Eichenwald, K. (2002) ‘Evidence proving fraud may turn out to be elusive’, New York Times, (January 30), http://www.nytimes.com/200230/business/30TIES.html.
45. Perry, R. (1993) ‘Accounting for securitizations’, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 71-92.
46. Powers, W.C., Troubh, R.S. and Winokur, H.S. (2002) Report of Investigation by the Special Investigative Committee of the Board of Directors of Enron Corp., Houston, TX: En-ron Corp.
47. SEC (1985) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 40: Receivables from Sale of Stock, Topic 4-E, Washington, DC: Securities and Exchange Commission.
48. SEC (1999) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101: Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, Washington, DC: Securities and Exchange Commission.
49. Smith, R. and Emshwiller, J.E. (2001) ‘Fancy finances were key to Enron’s success and now to its distress’, Wall Street Journal, (November 8), p. A-I.
50. Sprinzen, S. (2002) ‘Accounting abuses and proposed counlermealures’, Standard and Poors: Ratcngs Dicect (July 2), http://wwww.stnadardandpoors.com/Forum/RatingsDi-rect.
51. Strategic Management Wharton (2002) ‘Oh, the games Enron played’, Knowledge Wharton, http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/category.cfm?catid=7andnum=3.
52. Tauzin, W.J., Dingell, J.D. and Greenwood, J.C. (2002) ‘Letter to Mr. Jeffrey Skilling c/o Bruce A. Hiler, Esq. O’Melveny and Myers, LLP’, Committee on Energy and Commerce News Release, (February 28), http://energycommittee.house.gov.
53. Vanderlinden, RL. (1988) ‘Bidding farewell to the social costs of electricity production: pricing alternatives to energy under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act’, The Journal of Corporation Law (Summer), pp. 1011-1050.
54. Weil J. (2001) ‘Basic principles of accounting tripped Enron’, Wall Street Journal (November 12), p.C-l.