StrAuto: Automation and parallelization of STRUCTURE analysis

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Chhatre, Vikram E ^a,b   Emerson, Kevin J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^c ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Parallelization; Population genomics; STRUCTURE analysis

Indexed keywords

OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE; PIPELINES;

COMPUTATIONAL CHALLENGES; GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE; GENOMICS; HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING CLUSTERS; ITERATIVE STRUCTURES; PARALLELIZATIONS; POPULATION STRUCTURES; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

PIPELINE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

AUTOMATION; BENCHMARKING; GENOMICS; HUMAN; LICENCE; PIPELINE; POPULATION STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES;

AUTOMATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTING METHODOLOGIES; HUMANS;

EID: 85016144681     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-1593-0     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Maglo KN, Mersha TB, Martin LJ. Population genomics and the statistical values of race: An interdisciplinary perspective on the biological classification of human populations and implications for clinical genetic epidemiological research. Front Genet. 2016; 7(22):1-13. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.0002210.3389/fgene.2016.00022.
2. Payseur BA, Rieseberg LH. A genomic perspective on hybridization and speciation. Mol Ecol. 2016. p. 1-24. doi: 10.1111/mec.1355710.1111/mec.13557.
3. Gilbert KJ, Andrew RL, Bock DG, Franklin MT, Kane NC, Moore JS, Moyers BT, Renaut S, Rennison DJ, Veen T, Vines TH. Recommendations for utilizing and reporting population genetic analyses: the reproducibility of genetic clustering using the program structure. Mol Ecol. 2012; 21(20):4925-930. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05754.x10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05754.x.
4. François O, Waits LP. Clustering and assignment methods in landscape genetics In: Balkenhol N, Cushman SA, Storfer AT, Waits LP, editors. Landscape Genetics: Concepts, Methods, Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: 2015. p. 114-28. Chap. 7. doi: 10.1002/9781118525258.ch0710.1002/9781118525258.ch07.
5. Cavanagh CR, Chao S, Wang S, Huang BE, Stephen S, Kiani S, Forrest K, Saintenac C, Brown-Guedira GL, Akhunova A, et al. Genome-wide comparative diversity uncovers multiple targets of selection for improvement in hexaploid wheat landraces and cultivars. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013; 110(20):8057-062.
6. Keller SR, Olson MS, Silim S, Schroeder W, Tiffin P. Genomic diversity, population structure, and migration following rapid range expansion in the balsam poplar, Populus balsamifera. Mol Ecol. 2010; 19(6):1212-1226.
7. Chhatre VE, Byram TD, Neale DB, Wegrzyn JL, Krutovsky KV. Genetic structure and association mapping of adaptive and selective traits in the east texas loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) breeding populations. Tree Genet Genomes. 2013; 9(5):1161-1178.
8. Le Cam S, Perrier C, Besnard AL, Bernatchez L, Evanno G. Genetic and phenotypic changes in an atlantic salmon population supplemented with non-local individuals: a longitudinal study over 21 years. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2015; 282(1802):20142765.
9. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000; 155:945-59.
10. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009; 9(5):1322-1332. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02591.x10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02591.x.
11. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics. 2003; 164(4):1567-1587.
12. Falush D, van Dorp L, Lawson D. A tutorial on how (not) to over-interpret STRUCTURE/ADMIXTURE bar plots. bioRxiv. 2016. doi:10.1101/066431. http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/07/28/066431.full.pdf.
13. Wang J. The computer program STRUCTURE for assigning individuals to populations: easy to use but easier to misuse. Mol Ecol Resour. 2017. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.1265010.1111/1755-0998.12650.
14. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005; 14:2611-620.
15. Edwards SV, Shultz AJ, Campbell-Staton SC. Next-generation sequencing and the expanding domain of phylogeography. Folia Zool. 2015; 64(3):187-206.
16. Garrick RC, Bonatelli IA, Hyseni C, Morales A, Pelletier TA, Perez MF, Rice E, Satler JD, Symula RE, Thomé MTC, et al. The evolution of phylogeographic data sets. Mol Ecol. 2015; 24(6):1164-1171.
17. Raj A, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. fastSTRUCTURE: variational inference of population structure in large SNP data sets. Genetics. 2014; 197(2):573-89.
18. Earl DA, vonHoldt BM. Structure harvester: A website and program for visualizing structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2012; 4(2):359-61.
19. Besnier F, Glover KA. ParallelStructure: A R package to distribute parallel runs of the population genetics program STRUCTURE on multi-core computers. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(7):70651.
20. Tange O. GNU Parallel - the command-line power tool. USENIX Mag. 2011; 36(1):42-7.
21. Chhatre VE, Rajora OP. Genetic divergence and signatures of natural selection in marginal populations of a keystone, long-lived conifer, eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) from northern ontario. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(5):97291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.009729110.1371/journal.pone.0097291.
22. Emerson KJ, Conn JE, Bergo ES, Randel MA, Sallum MAM. Brazilian Anopheles darlingi Root (Diptera: Culicidae) clusters by major biogeographical region. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(7):0130773.
23. Advanced Research Computing Center. Mount Moran: IBM System X cluster. Laramie: University of Wyoming; 2012. http://n2t.net/ark:/85786/m4159c.