The Metasaxophone: Concept, implementation, and mapping strategies for a new computer music instrument

Organised Sound

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 201-213

  Burtner, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016086111     PISSN: 13557718     EISSN: 14698153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1355771802002108     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Burtner, M. 1999. Portals of Distortion. Innova Records, American Composers Forum, St. Paul, MN, CD512.
2. Burtner, M., and Serafin, S. 2000. Extended techniques for physical models using instrument controller substitution. In Proc. of the Int. Soc. of Musical Acoustics (ISMA). Perugia, Italy.
3. Burtner, M., and Serafin, S. 2001. Real time extended physical models for the performer and composer. In Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. (ICMC). Havana, Cuba.
4. Burtner, M., and Serafin, S. 2002. The Exbow Metasax: compositional applications of bowed string physical models using instrument controller substitution. Journal of New Music Research 22(5). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger. Cook, P. 1992. A meta-wind-instrument physical model, and a meta-controller for real time performance control. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. (ICMC). San Jose, USA.
5. Cook, P. 2001. Principles for designing computer music controllers. In Proc. of NIME-01. Seattle, USA.
6. Cook, P., Morrill, D., and Smith, J. O. 1993. A MIDI control and performance system for brass instruments. In Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. Tokyo, Japan.
7. Hunt, A. 1999. Radical User Interfaces for Real-time Musical Control. D. Phil. thesis, University of York, UK.
8. Hunt, A., and Kirk, R. 2000. Mapping strategies for musical performance. In M. Wanderley and M. Battier (eds.) Trends in Gestural Control of Music. Ircam, Centre Pompidou.
9. Hunt, A., Wanderley, M., and Kirk, R. 2000. Towards a model for instrumental mapping in expert musical interaction. In Proc. of the 2000 Int. Computer Music Conf. (ICMC). Berlin, Germany.
10. Laubier, S. 1998. The Meta-Instrument. Computer Music Journal 22(1). Cambridge, USA.
11. Mathews, M., Verplank, B., and Shaw, R. 2000. Scanned Synthesis, a new synthesis technique. In Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. (ICMC). Berlin, Germany.
12. Orio, N., Schnell, N., and Wanderley, M. 2001. Input devices for musical expression: borrowing tools from HCI. Proc. of the NIME-01. Seattle, USA. Parallax Incorporated. 1999. BASIC Stamp Programming Manual. Version 1.0. http://www.paralaxinc.com
13. Rascher, S. 1972. The Story of the Saxophone. http://www.classicsax.com
14. Rovan, J., Wanderley, M., Dubnov, S., and Depalle, P. 1997. Instrumental gestural mapping strategies as expressivity determinants in computer music performance. In A. Camurri (ed.) Kansei, The Technology of Emotion: Proc. of the AIMI Int. Workshop. Genoa, Italy.
15. Scavone, G. 1999. The Holey Controller. http://www-ccrma.stanford.edu/{ approx }gary Softwind Instruments. 1986. The Synthophone Manual. http://home.att.net/{approx}synthophone/manual/index.htm
16. Truax, B. 1988. Real-time granular synthesis with a digital signal processor. Computer Music Journal 12(2).
17. Wanderley, M. 2001. Performer-Instrument Interaction: Applications to Gestural Control of Music. Ph.D. thesis. Paris, France: University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI.
18. Ziccarelli, D. 1998. An extensible real-time signal processing environment for Max. In Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. (ICMC). Ann Arbor, USA.