Do forests best mitigate CO2 emissions to the atmosphere by setting them aside for maximization of carbon storage or by management for fossil fuel substitution?

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 197, Issue , 2017, Pages 117-129

  Taeroe, Anders ^a,b   Mustapha, Walid Fayez ^a,c   Stupak, Inge ^a   Raulund Rasmussen, Karsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b HedeDanmark A S   (Denmark)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Carbon emissions; Carbon parity time; Forest carbon storage; Sensitivity analyses

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CONVERSION EFFICIENCY; EMISSION CONTROL; FORESTRY; FUEL STORAGE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUPPLY CHAINS; WOOD;

BIO-ENERGY; BUSINESS-AS-USUAL; CARBON CARBONS; CARBON EMISSIONS; CARBON PARITY TIME; CARBON STORAGE; ENERGY; FOREST CARBON STORAGE; FOREST CARBONS; SENSITIVITY ANALYZES;

FOSSIL FUELS;

CARBON; COAL; FOSSIL FUEL; NATURAL GAS;

BIOENERGY; BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; DECIDUOUS FOREST; DECIDUOUS TREE; EMISSION CONTROL; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOSSIL FUEL; GROWTH RATE; NATURAL GAS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SET-ASIDE; WOOD;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERE; BEECH; BIOMASS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CARBON STORAGE; CARBON UTILIZATION; COMBUSTION; ENERGY; ENERGY CONVERSION; ENERGY YIELD; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOSSIL ENERGY; MONOCULTURE; PLANTATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WOOD; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOREST;

FAGUS SYLVATICA;

ATMOSPHERE; BIOMASS; CARBON; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; FORESTS; FOSSIL FUELS;

EID: 85016029291     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.051     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Baritz, R., Seufert, G., Montanarella, L., Van Ranst, E., Carbon concentrations and stocks in forest soils of Europe. For. Ecol. Manag. 260 (2010), 262–277.
2. Bentsen, N.S., Carbon debt and payback time – lost in the forest?. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 73 (2017), 1211–1217.
3. Brevik, E.C., Cerdà, A., Mataix-Solera, J., Pereg, L., Quinton, J.N., Six, J., Van Oost, K., The interdisciplinary nature of soil. Soil 1 (2015), 117–129.
4. Brunet-Navarro, P., Jochheim, H., Muys, B., Modelling carbon stocks and fluxes in the wood product sector: a comparative review. Glob. Change Biol. 22 (2016), 2555–2569.
5. Buchholz, T., Hurteau, M.D., Gunn, J., Saah, D., A global meta-analysis of forest bioenergy greenhouse gas emission accounting studies. GCB Bioenergy 8 (2016), 281–289.
6. Callesen, I., Stupak, I., Georgiadis, P., Johansen, V., Østergaard, H., Vesterdal, L., Soil carbon stock change in the forests of Denmark between 1990 and 2008. Geoderma Reg. 5 (2015), 169–180.
7. Cherubini, F., Guest, G., Stromman, A.H., Application of probability distributions to the modeling of biogenic CO2 fluxes in life cycle assessment. GCB Bioenergy 4 (2012), 784–798.
8. Cintas, O., Berndes, G., Hansson, J., Poudel, B.C., Bergh, J., Borjesson, P., Egnell, G., Lundmark, T., Nordin, A., The potential role of forest management in Swedish scenarios towards climate neutrality by mid century. For. Ecol. Manag. 383 (2017), 73–84.
9. CORRIM, Maximizing Forest Contributions to Carbon Mitigation, the Science of Life Cycle Analysis – a Summary of CORRIM's Research Findings. 2009 Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials http://www.corrim.org/pubs/factsheets/fs_05.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2017).
10. Dumortier, J., Hayes, D.J., Carriquiry, M., Dong, F.X., Du, X.D., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J.F., Tokgoz, S., Sensitivity of carbon emission estimates from indirect land-use change. Appl. Econ. Perspect. P. 33 (2011), 428–448.
11. Duncker, P.S., Raulund-Rasmussen, K., Gundersen, P., Katzensteiner, K., De Jong, J., Ravn, H.P., Smith, M., Eckmullner, O., Spiecker, H., How forest management affects ecosystem services, including timber production and economic return: synergies and trade-offs. Ecol. Soc., 17, 2012.
12. ECN, Phyllis 2, Database. 2015 https://www.ecn.nl/phyllis2/ (Accessed 25 February 2017).
13. Energistyrelsen, Danish Energy Agency Statistics 2014. 2014 https://ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/Statistik/energistatistik_2014.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2017).
14. GREET, Biomass Energy Data Book: Lower and Higher Heating Values of Gas Liquid and Solid Fuels. 2010, Argonne National Laboratory http://www.co.shasta.ca.us/docs/Resource_Management/spi-feir/3_Exhibit_2.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2017).
15. Gustavsson, L., Haus, S., Ortiz, C.A., Sathre, R., Truong, N.L., Climate effects of bioenergy from forest residues in comparison to fossil energy. Appl. Energ 138 (2015), 36–50.
16. Gustavsson, L., Haus, S., Lundblad, M., Lundstrom, A., Ortiz, C.A., Sathre, R., Le Truong, N., Wikberg, P.E., Climate change effects of forestry and substitution of carbon-intensive materials and fossil fuels. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 67 (2017), 612–624.
17. Gylling, M., Jørgensen, U., Scott Bentsen, N., + 10 mio. tons planen - muligheder for en øget dansk produktion af bæredygtig biomasse til bioraffinaderier - in danish. 2012 http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/44867884/Ti_mio_plan_net1.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2017).
18. Hanssen, S.V., Duden, A.S., Junginger, M., Dale, V.H., van der Hilst, F., Wood pellets, what else? Greenhouse gas parity times of European electricity from wood pellets produced in the south-eastern United States using different softwood feedstocks. GCB Bioenergy, 2017, 10.1111/gcbb.12426.
19. Haus, S., Gustavsson, L., Sathre, R., Climate mitigation comparison of woody biomass systems with the inclusion of land-use in the reference fossil system. Biomass Bioenerg. 65 (2014), 136–144.
20. Hektor, B., Backeus, S., Andersson, K., Carbon balance for wood production from sustainably managed forests. Biomass Bioenerg. 93 (2016), 1–5.
21. Helin, T., Sokka, L., Soimakallio, S., Pingoud, K., Pajula, T., Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment - a review. GCB Bioenergy 5 (2013), 475–486.
22. Holtsmark, B., Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt. Clim. Change 112 (2012), 415–428.
23. Holtsmark, B., The outcome is in the assumptions: analyzing the effects on atmospheric CO2 levels of increased use of bioenergy from forest biomass. GCB Bioenergy 5 (2013), 467–473.
24. Holtsmark, B., Quantifying the global warming potential of CO2 emissions from wood fuels. GCB Bioenergy 7 (2015), 195–206.
25. Hombegowda, H.C., van Straaten, O., Köhler, M., Hölscher, D., On the rebound: soil organic carbon stocks can bounce back to near forest levels when agroforests replace agriculture in southern India. Soil 2 (2016), 13–23.
26. Houghton, R.A., Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance. Glob. Change Biol. 11 (2005), 945–958.
27. Huntington, T.G., Carbon sequestration in an aggrading forest ecosystem in the southeastern USA. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59 (1995), 1459–1467.
28. IPCC, Harvested Wood Products, Chapter 12 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. 2006, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/4_Volume4/V4_12_Ch12_HWP.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2017).
29. IPCC, Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Special report prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2012, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srren/SRREN_FD_SPM_final.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2017).
30. IPCC, Climate Change 2013: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2013, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_SummaryVolume_FINAL.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2017).
31. Jensen, J.K., Rasmussen, L.H., Raulund-Rasmussen, K., Borggaard, O.K., Influence of soil properties on the growth of sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) in Denmark. Eur. J. For. Res. 127 (2008), 263–274.
32. Johannsen, V.K., Nord-Larsen, T., Scott Bentsen, N., Suadicani, K., Hansen, J.K., Braüner, U., Graudal, L., Scenarieberegning for biomasseproduktion i skov – virkemidler og forudsætninger. Baggrundsnotat til Perspektiver for skovenes bidrag til grøn omstilling mod en biobaseret økonomi. 2012 Muligheder for bæredygtig udvidelse af dansk produceret vedmasse - in danish http://ign.ku.dk/formidling/publikationer/rapporter/filer-2013/Final-Skovenes-bidrag-biobaseret-oekonomi-17jan.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2017).
33. Johansson, T., Karacic, A., Increment and biomass in hybrid poplar and some practical implications. Biomass Bioenerg. 35 (2011), 1925–1934.
34. Jonker, J.G.G., Junginger, M., Faaij, A., Carbon payback period and carbon offset parity point of wood pellet production in the South-eastern United States. GCB Bioenergy 6 (2014), 371–389.
35. Jorgensen, S.V., Hauschild, M.Z., Nielsen, P.H., Assessment of urgent impacts of greenhouse gas emissions-the climate tipping potential (CTP). Int. J. Life Cycle Ass 19 (2014), 919–930.
36. Lamers, P., Junginger, M., The 'debt' is in the detail: a synthesis of recent temporal forest carbon analyses on woody biomass for energy. Biofuel. Bioprod. Bior 7 (2013), 373–385.
37. Lamers, P., Junginger, M., Dymond, C.C., Faaij, A., Damaged forests provide an opportunity to mitigate climate change. GCB Bioenergy 6 (2014), 44–60.
38. Lippke, B., Gustafson, R., Venditti, R., Steele, P., Volk, T.A., Oneil, E., Johnson, L., Puettmann, M.E., Skog, K., Comparing life-cycle carbon and energy impacts for biofuel, wood product, and forest management alternatives. For. Prod. J. 62 (2012), 247–257.
39. Luyssaert, S., Schulze, E.D., Borner, A., Knohl, A., Hessenmoller, D., Law, B.E., Ciais, P., Grace, J., Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature 455 (2008), 213–215.
40. Mantau, U., Saal, U., Prins, K., Steierer, F., Lindner, M., Verkerk, H., Eggers, J., Leek, N., Oldenburger, J., Asikainen, A., Anttila, P., EU Woods - Real Potential for Changes in Growth and Use of EU Forests. Final report, 2010 https://www.egger.com/downloads/bildarchiv/187000/1_187099_DV_Real-potential-changes-growth_EN.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2017).
41. Mathews, J.A., Tan, H., Biofuels and indirect land use change effects: the debate continues. Biofuel. Bioprod. Bior 3 (2009), 305–317.
42. Miner, R.A., Abt, R.C., Bowyer, J.L., Buford, M.A., Malmsheimer, R.W., O'Laughlin, J., Oneil, E.E., Sedjo, R.A., Skog, K.E., Forest carbon accounting considerations in US bioenergy policy. J. For. 112 (2014), 591–606.
43. Mitchell, S.R., Harmon, M.E., O'Connell, K.E.B., Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production. GCB Bioenergy 4 (2012), 818–827.
44. Møller, C.M.M., Bonitetstabeller og bonitetsvise tilvækstoversigter for bøg, eg og rødgran i danmark - in Danish. Dan. Skovforenings Tidsskr. 18 (1933), 537–623.
45. Naudts, K., Chen, Y.Y., McGrath, M.J., Ryder, J., Valade, A., Otto, J., Luyssaert, S., Europe's forest management did not mitigate climate warming. Science 351 (2016), 597–600.
46. Nord-Larsen, T., Johannsen, V.K., A state-space approach to stand growth modelling of European beech. Ann. For. Sci. 64 (2007), 365–374.
47. Nord-Larsen, T.V.K.J., Riis-Nielsen, T.I.M.T., Schou, E., Suadicani, K., Jørgensen, B., Skove Og Plantager 2014. 2014 http://ign.ku.dk/formidling/publikationer/haefter/filer/SP2014.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2017).
48. Oliver, C.D., Nassar, N.T., Lippke, B.R., McCarter, J.B., Carbon, fossil fuel, and biodiversity mitigation with wood and forests. J. Sustain. For. 33 (2014), 248–275.
49. Plevin, R.J., O'Hare, M., Jones, A.D., Torn, M.S., Gibbs, H.K., Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels' indirect land use change are uncertain but may Be much greater than previously estimated. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (2010), 8015–8021.
50. Robledo-Abad, C., Althaus, H.-J., Berndes, G., Bolwig, S., Corbera, E., Creutzig, F., Garcia-Ulloa, J., Geddes, A., Gregg, J.S., Harberl, H., Hanger, S., Harper, R.J., Hunsberger, C., Larsen, R.K., Lauk, C., Leitner, S., Lillistam, J., Lotze-Campen, H., Muys, B., Nordborg, M., Lund, M., Orlowsky, O., Poppi, A., Portugal-Pereira, J., Reinhard, J., Scheiffle, L., Smith, P., Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policymaking remains limited. GCB Bioenergy 9 (2017), 541–556.
51. Röser, D., Pasanen, K., Asikainen, A., Decision-support program “EnerTree” for analyzing forest residue recovery options. Biomass Bioenerg. 30 (2006), 326–333.
52. Sartori, F., Lal, R., Ebinger, M.H., Parrish, D.J., Potential soil carbon sequestration and CO2 offset by dedicated energy crops in the USA. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 25 (2006), 441–472.
53. Sathre, R., O'Connor, J., Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution. Environ. Sci. Policy 13 (2010), 104–114.
54. Schou, E., Suadicani, K., Johannsen, V.K., Carbon Sequestration in Harvested Wood Products (HWP), Data for 2013-Reporting to the UNFCCC, Final Draft. 2015, Institut for Geovidenskab og Naturforvaltning, Københavns Universitet http://envs.au.dk/fileadmin/Resources/DMU/Luft/emission/SINKS/Final_Report_HWP_final.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2017).
55. Schulze, E.D., Korner, C.I., Law, B.E., Haberl, H., Luyssaert, S., Large-scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral. GCB Bioenergy 4 (2012), 611–616.
56. Seidl, R., Rammer, W., Jager, D., Currie, W.S., Lexer, M.J., Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria. For. Ecol. Manag. 248 (2007), 64–79.
57. Skovsgaard, J.P., Nord-Larsen, T., Biomass, basic density and biomass expansion factor functions for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Denmark. Eur. J. For. Res., 131, 2012 1637–1637.
58. Smeets, E.M.W., Faaij, A.P.C., Bioenergy potentials from forestry in 2050-An assessment of the drivers that determine the potentials. Clim. Change 81 (2007), 353–390.
59. Taeroe, A., Nord-Larsen, T., Stupak, I., Raulund-Rasmussen, K., Allometric biomass, biomass expansion factor and wood density models for OP42 hybrid poplar in southern Scandinavia. Bioenerg. Res. 8 (2015), 1332–1342.
60. Taeroe, A., Stupak, I., Raulund-Rasmussen, K., Growth and Management of the OP42 Poplar Clone in Southern Scandinavia. 2016, University of Copenhagen, Unpublished manuscript.
61. Tamminen, P., Saarsalmi, A., Smolander, A., Kukkola, M., Helmisaari, H.S., Effects of logging residue harvest in thinnings on amounts of soil carbon and nutrients in Scots pine and Norway spruce stands. For. Ecol. Manag. 263 (2012), 31–38.
62. Ter-Mikaelian, M.T., Colombo, S.J., Chen, J., The burning question: does forest bioenergy reduce carbon Emissions? A review of common misconceptions about forest carbon accounting. J. For. 113 (2014), 57–68.
63. Vadeboncoeur, M.A., Hamburg, S.P., Yanai, R.D., Blum, J.D., Rates of sustainable forest harvest depend on rotation length and weathering of soil minerals. For. Ecol. Manag. 318 (2014), 194–205.
64. Vesterdal, L., Christensen, M., The carbon pools in a Danish semi-natural forest. Ecol. Bull. 52 (2007), 113–121.
65. Waldchen, J., Schulze, E.D., Schoning, I., Schrumpf, M., Sierra, C., The influence of changes in forest management over the past 200 years on present soil organic carbon stocks. For. Ecol. Manag. 289 (2013), 243–254.
66. Walmsley, J.D., Godbold, D.L., Stump harvesting for bioenergy - a review of the environmental impacts. Forestry 83 (2010), 17–38.
67. Wihersaari, M., Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from biomass production chains. Energ. Convers. Manage 37 (1996), 1217–1221.
68. Wihersaari, M., Greenhouse gas emissions from final harvest fuel chip production in Finland. Biomass Bioenerg. 28 (2005), 435–443.
69. Wu, J., Larsen, K.S., van der Linden, L., Beier, C., Pilegaard, K., Ibrom, A., Synthesis on the carbon budget and cycling in a Danish, temperate deciduous forest. Agr. For. Meteorol. 181 (2013), 94–107.
70. Zanchi, G., Pena, N., Bird, N., Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. GCB Bioenergy 4 (2012), 761–772.