Reexamining the Effect of Racial Propositions on Latinos’ Partisanship in California

Political Behavior

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 149-174

  Hui, Iris ^a   Sears, David O ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

California; Immigration; Latino; Partisan identification; Racial propositions; Realignment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015978500     PISSN: 01909320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-017-9400-1     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alvarez, M., & Butterfield, T. (2000). The resurgence of nativism in California? The case of Proposition 187 and illegal immigration. Social Science Quarterly, 81(1), 167–179.
2. Angus, C., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3. Armbruster, R., Geron, K., & Bonacich, E. (1995). The assault on California’s Latino immigrants: The politics of Proposition 187. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 19, 655–663.
4. Balin, B. (2008). State immigration legislation and immigrant flows: An analysis. Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies.
5. Barreto, M., Ramirez, R., & Woods, N. (2005). Are naturalized voters driving the California Latino electorate? Measuring the effect of IRCA citizens on Latino voting. Social Science Quarterly, 86(4), 792–811.
6. Barreto, M., & Woods, N. (2005). Latino voting behavior in an anti-Latino political context: The case of Los Angeles County. In G. M. Segura & S. Bowler (Eds.), Diversity in democracy: Minority representation in the United States (pp. 148–169). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
7. Birgeneau, R. (2005). How California’s Proposition 209 created a crisis in African-American higher education. Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 47, 59–59.
8. Bowler, S., Nicholson, S., & Segura, G. (2006). Earthquakes and aftershocks: Race, direct democracy, and partisan change. American Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 146–159.
9. Burnham, W. D. (1970). Critical elections and the mainsprings of American politics. New York: Norton.
10. Campbell, A., Wong, C., & Citrin, J. (2006). Racial threat, partisan climate, and direct democracy: Contextual effects in three California initiatives. Political Behavior, 28(2), 129–150.
11. Carmines, E., & Stimson, J. (1981). Issue evolution, population replacement, and normal partisan change. American Political Science Review, 75(1), 107–118.
12. Dyck, J., Johnson, G., & Wasson, J. (2012). A blue tide in the golden state: Ballot propositions, population change, and party identification in California. American Politics Research, 40(3), 450–475.
13. Field Poll. (1995). A summary analysis of voting in the 1994 general election (January 1995). ISSN 0271-1095.
14. Fiorina, M. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Fiorina, M., & Abrams, S. (2008). Is California really a blue state? In F. Douzet, T. Kousser, & K. P. Miller (Eds.), The new political geography of California. Berkeley: Berkeley Public Policy Press, Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California.
16. Fiorina, M., Abrams, S., & Pope, J. (2005). Culture war?. New York: Pearson Longman.
17. Frey, W. (1995). Immigration and internal migration “flight”: A California case study. Population and Environment, 16(4), 353–375.
18. Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds. New Haven: Yale University Press.
19. Hajnal, Z., & Lee, T. (2011). Why Americans don’t join the party: Race, immigration, and the failure (of political parties) to engage the electorate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20. Hernandez, S. (1999). The life after death of Proposition 187. Black Issues in Higher Education, 16(14), 124–129.
21. HoSang, D. (2010). Racial propositions: Ballot initiatives and the making of postwar California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. Hui, I. (2010). Growing geographic polarization and the perpetuation of the electoral disconnect. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
23. Key, V. O. (1955). A theory of critical elections. Journal of Politics, 17(01), 3–18.
24. Key, V. O. (1959). Secular realignment and the party system. Journal of Politics, 21(02), 198–210.
25. Korey, J., & Lascher, E. (2006). Macropartisanship in California. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 48–65.
26. Lee, Y.-T., Ottati, V., & Hussain, I. (2001). Attitudes toward “Illegal” Immigration into the United States: California Proposition 187. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 23(4), 430–443.
27. Lewis-Beck, M., Norpoth, H., Jacoby, W., & Weisburg, H. (2008). The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
28. Martin, P. (1995). Proposition 187 in California. International Migration Review, 29(1), 255–263.
29. Mayhew, D. (2002). Electoral realignments: A critique of an American genre. New Haven: Yale University Press.
30. Nardulli, P. (1995). The concept of a critical realignment, electoral behavior, and political change. American Political Science Review, 89(01), 10–22.
31. Nicholson, S., & Segura, G. (2005). Agenda change and the politics of Latino Partisan identification. In G. M. Segura & S. Bowler (Eds.), Diversity in democracy: Minority representation in the United States (pp. 51–71). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
32. Ono, K., & Sloop, J. (2002). Shifting borders: Rhetoric, immigration, and California’s Proposition 187. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
33. Pantoja, A., Ramirez, R., & Segura, G. (2001). Citizens by choice, voters by necessity: Patterns in political mobilization by naturalized Latinos. Political Research Quarterly, 54(4), 729–750.
34. Pantoja, A., & Segura, G. (2003). Fear and loathing in California: Contextual threat and political sophistication among Latino voters. Political Behavior, 25(3), 265–286.
35. Pew Research Center. (2014). The shifting religious identity of Latinos in the United States. Online Report. http://www.pewforum.org/files/2014/05/Latinos-Religion-07-22-full-report.pdf.
36. Polsby, N. (2004). How congress evolves: Social bases of institutional change. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Robinson, G., Krasno, J., Zingher, J., & Allen, M. (2016). Creating a racially polarized electorate: The political fallout of immigration politics in Arizona and California. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 4(4), 579–597.
38. Rubenstein, E. (2012). Remembering proposition 187. Social Contract, Winter, 3–7.
39. Suarez-Orozco, M. (1996). California dreaming: Proposition 187 and the cultural psychology of racial and ethnic exclusion. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 27(2), 151–167.
40. Sundquist, J. (1983). Dynamics of the party system. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
41. UCData. (2008). The Field Institute/The California poll cumulative file for the years: 1956-2006. Berkeley: University of California.