The use of road infrastructure data for urban transportation planning: Issues and opportunities

Infrastructure Reporting and Asset Management: Best Practices and Opportunities

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 93-98

  Xie, Feng ^a   Levinson, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HIGHWAY PLANNING; INVESTMENTS; ROADS AND STREETS; URBAN PLANNING;

LEVEL OF SERVICE; METROPOLITAN AREA; MINNESOTA; ROAD CONDITION; ROAD INFRASTRUCTURES; ROAD PROJECTS; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MODELS;

URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 85015924819     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1061/9780784409589.ch13     Document Type: Chapter

References (8)

1. Hammerand, J. (2006). “Rating Minnesota’s Roads.” The Minnesota Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP): Technology Exchange, vol.24, No.l, 3
2. Kwon, T.M., and N. Dhruv (2004). “Unified Transportation Sensor Data Format (UTSDF) for Efficient Archiving and Sharing of Statewide Transportation Sensor Data.” Proc. of the Transportation Research Board 83rd Annual Meeting.
3. Levinson, D., Montes de Oca, N., and Xie, F. (2006). “Beyond Business as Usual: Ensuring the Network We Want is the Network We Get.” Final Report for TAP Meeting May 30th, 2006
4. Minnesota Metropolitan Inter-County Association (2005). “Driving Minnesota’s Economic Vitality: The Need to Invest in Our Transportation System.” (May 20, 2006).
5. Minnesota Department of Transportation (2005). Official Website: (May 20, 2006)
6. Montes de Oca, N., and Levinson, D. (2006). “Network Expansion Decision-making in the Twin Cities.” Journal of the Transportation Research Board: Transportation Research Record, in press.
7. Washington County Transportation Division (2004). “Washington County Annual Performance Report for 2004.”
8. (May 20, 2006)