Resilient interconnection in cyber-physical control systems

Computers and Security

Volumn 71, Issue , 2017, Pages 2-14

  Alcaraz, Cristina ^a   Lopez, Javier ^a   Choo, Kim Kwang Raymond ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Access control; Cyber physical systems; Interconnection; Redundancy; Resilience; Structural controllability

Indexed keywords

CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEM; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; REDUNDANCY; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

ATTRIBUTE BASED ACCESS CONTROL; AUTHORIZATION SERVICES; CONTEXT MANAGEMENT; CYBER PHYSICALS; INTERCONNECTION; RESILIENCE; STRUCTURAL CONTROL; STRUCTURAL CONTROLLABILITY;

ACCESS CONTROL;

EID: 85015804609     PISSN: 01674048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2017.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Albert, R., Barabási, A., Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys, 74(1), 2002, 4797.
2. Alcaraz, C., Lopez, J., Safeguarding structural controllability in cyber-physical control systems. The 21st European symposium on research in computer security (ESORICS 2016), vol. 9879, 2016, Springer, Crete, Greece, 471–489.
3. Alcaraz, C., Lopez, J., Secure interoperability in cyber-physical systems. Security solutions and applied cryptography in smart grid communications, 2017, IGI Global, USA, 137–158 Ch. 8.
4. Alcaraz, C., Wolthusen, S., Recovery of structural controllability for control systems. Eighth IFIP WG 11.10 international conference on critical infrastructure, vol. 441, 2014, Springer, 47–63.
5. Alcaraz, C., Miciolino, E.E., Wolthusen, S., Structural controllability of networks for non-interactive adversarial vertex removal. 8th international conference on critical information infrastructures security, vol. 8328, 2013, Springer, 120–132.
6. Alcaraz, C., Lopez, J., Choo, K.R., Dynamic restoration in interconnected RBAC-based cyber-physical control systems. Proceedings of the 13th international joint conference on e-business and telecommunications (ICETE 2016), Volume 4: SECRYPT, Lisbon, Portugal, July 26–28, 2016 p. 19–27.
7. Alcaraz, C., Lopez, J., Wolthusen, S., Policy enforcement system for secure interoperable control in distributed smart grid systems. J Netw Comput Appl 59 (2016), 301–314.
8. Coyne, E., Weil, T.R., ABAC and RBAC: scalable, flexible, and auditable access management. insecure IT Pro, 2013, IEEE Computer Society, 14–16.
9. Haynes, T., Hedetniemi, S.M., Hedetniemi, S.T., Henning, M.A., Domination in graphs applied to electric power networks. SIAM J Discrete Math 15:4 (2002), 519–529.
10. Hu, V.C., Ferraiolo, D.F., Kuhn, D.R., Assessment of access control systems (NISTIR 7316). National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); Available from: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistir/7316/NISTIR-7316.pdf, 2006 [Accessed December 2016].
11. IEC-61850, Power utility automation – communication networks and systems in substations – parts 1–10. TC 57 – Power systems management and associated information exchange, 2003.
12. IEC-62351, IEC-62351 parts 1–8: Information security for power system control operations. International Electrotechnical Commission; Available from: http://www.iec.ch/smartgrid/standards/, 2007–2016 [Accessed December 2016].
13. IEC-62351-3, Power systems management and associated information exchange – data and communications security – part 3: Communication network and system security – profiles including TCP/IP. International Electrotechnical Commission; Available from: http://www.iec.ch/smartgrid/standards/, 2007 [Accessed December 2016].
14. IEC-62351-8, Power systems management and associated information exchange – data and communications security – part 8: Role-based access control. International Electrotechnical Commission; Available from: http://www.iec.ch/smartgrid/standards/, 2011 [Accessed December 2016].
15. Kalman, R.E., Mathematical description of linear dynamical systems. J Soc Indust Appl Math Control Ser A 1 (1963), 152–192.
16. Kneis, J., Mölle, D., Richter, S., Rossmanith, P., Parameterized power domination complexity. Inf Process Lett 98:4 (2006), 145–149.
17. Lin, C.-T., Structural controllability. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19:3 (1974), 201–208.
18. Liu, Y.-Y., Slotine, J.-J., Barabasi, A.-L., Controllability of complex networks. Nature 473:7346 (2011), 167–173.
19. Marchese, M., Mongelli, M., Simple protocol enhancements of rapid spanning tree protocol over ring topologies. Comput Netw 56:4 (2012), 1131–1151.
20. Nakayama, K., Shinomiya, N., Watanabe, H., An autonomous distributed control method for link failure based on tie-set graph theory. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Reg Papers 59:11 (2012), 2727–2737.
21. Nie, S., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Li, Q., Wang, B., Robustness of controllability for networks based on edge-attack. PLoS ONE, 9(2), 2014 e8906.
22. NIST, A survey of access control models, Working Draft. National Institute of Standards and Technology; Available from: http://csrc.nist.gov/news_events/privilege-management-workshop/PvM-Model-Survey-Aug26-2009.pdf, 2009 [Accessed December 2016].
23. Pagani, G.A., Aiello, M., The power grid as a complex network: a survey. Phys A 392:11 (2013), 2688–2700.
24. Palmer, C., Steffan, J., Generating network topologies that obey power laws. Global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM '00), Vol. 1, 2000 p. 434–438.
25. Samuel, H., Zhuang, W., Preiss, B., Improving the dominating-set routing over delay-tolerant mobile ad-hoc networks via estimating node intermeeting times. EURASIP J Wireless Commun Netw 2011 (2011), 1–12 Hindawi Publishing Corporation.
26. Smith, M., Definition of the inetOrgPerson LDAP object class. RFC-2798; Available from: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2798.txt, 2000 [Accessed December 2016].
27. The Apache Software Foundation, Apache Directory Studio. Available from: http://directory.apache.org/studio/, 2003–2015 [Accessed December 2016].