A resting EEG study of neocortical hyperexcitability and altered functional connectivity in fragile X syndrome Refining translational treatment development in fragile X syndrome

Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Wang, Jun ^a   Ethridge, Lauren E ^b,c   Mosconi, Matthew W ^d   White, Stormi P ^e   Binder, Devin K ^f   Pedapati, Ernest V ^g   Erickson, Craig A ^g   Byerly, Matthew J ^h   Sweeney, John A ⁱ  

^a ZHEJIANG NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross frequency coupling; EEG; Fragile X syndrome; Gamma; Hyperexcitability; Top down modulation

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT; NEUROLEPTIC AGENT; PSYCHOSTIMULANT AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALPHA RHYTHM; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FRAGILE X SYNDROME; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; GAMMA RHYTHM; HUMAN; MALE; NEOCORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REST; RESTING STATE NETWORK; THETA RHYTHM;

EID: 85015802076     PISSN: 18661947     EISSN: 18661955     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s11689-017-9191-z     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ashley CJ, Wilkinson K, Reines D, Warren S. FMR1 protein: conserved RNP family domains and selective RNA binding. Science. 1993;262:563-6.
2. Bear MF. Therapeutic implications of the mGluR theory of fragile X mental retardation. Genes Brain Behav. 2005;4(6):393-8.
3. Heulens I, D'Hulst C, Braat S, Rooms L, Kooy RF. Involvement and therapeutic potential of the GABAergic system in the fragile x syndrome. Sci World J. 2010;10:2198-206.
4. Cea-Del Rio CA, Huntsman MM. The contribution of inhibitory interneurons to circuit dysfunction in Fragile X Syndrome. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:1-7.
5. Contractor A, Klyachko VA, Portera-Cailliau C. Altered neuronal and circuit excitability in fragile X syndrome. Neuron. 2015;87(4):699-715.
6. Gonçalves JT, Anstey JE, Golshani P, Portera-Cailliau C. Circuit level defects in the developing neocortex of Fragile X mice. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:903-9.
7. Gibson JR, Bartley AF, Hays SA, Huber KM. Imbalance of neocortical excitation and inhibition and altered UP states reflect network hyperexcitability in the mouse model of fragile X syndrome. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:2615-26.
8. Strumbos JG, Brown MR, Kronengold J, Polley DB, Kaczmarek LK. Fragile x mental retardation protein is required for rapid experience-dependent regulation of the potassium channel Kv3.1b. J Neurosci. 2010;30(31):10263-71.
9. Kim H, Gibboni R, Kirkhart C, Bao S. Impaired critical period plasticity in primary auditory cortex of fragile x model mice. J Neurosci. 2013;33(40):15686-92.
10. Rotschafer S, Razak K. Altered auditory processing in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Brain Res. 2013;1506:12-24.
11. Rojas DC, Benkers TL, Rogers SJ, Teale PD, Reite ML, Hagerman RJ. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in adults with fragile X syndrome. Neuroreport. 2001;12:2573-6.
12. Castrén M, Paakkonen A, Tarkka IM, Ryynanen M, Partanen J. Augmentation of auditory N1 in children with fragile X syndrome. Brain Topogr. 2003;15:165-71.
13. Van der Molen MJW, Van der Molen MW, Ridderinkhof KR, Hamel BCJ, Curfs LMG, Ramakers GJA. Auditory change detection in fragile X syndrome males: a brain potential study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123:1309-18.
14. Ethridge L, White S, Mosconi M, Wang J, Byerly M, Sweeney J. Reduced habituation of auditory evoked potentials indicate cortical hyper-excitability in Fragile X Syndrome. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6(4):e787.
15. Van der Molen MJW, Van der Molen MW. Reduced alpha and exaggerated theta power during the resting-state EEG in fragile X syndrome. Biol Psychol. 2013;92:216-9.
16. Van der Molen MJW, Stam CJ, van der Molen MW. Resting-state EEG oscillatory dynamics in fragile X syndrome: abnormal functional connectivity and brain network organization. PloS ONE. 2014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088451.
17. Traub RD, Cunningham MO, Glovell T, LeBeau FEN, Bibbig A, Buhl EH, et al. GABA-enhanced collective behavior in neuronal axons underlies persistent gamma-frequency oscillations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:11047-52.
18. Kim T, Thankachan S, McKenna JT, McNally JM, Yang C, Choi JH, et al. Cortically projecting basal forebrain parvalbumin neurons regulate cortical gamma band oscillations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:3535-40.
19. Sohal VS, Zhang F, Yizhar O, Deisseroth K. Parvalbumin neurons and gamma rhythms enhance cortical circuit performance. Nature. 2009;459:698-702.
20. Berzhanskaya J, Phillips MA, Gorin A, Lai C, Shen J, Colonnese MT. Disrupted cortical state regulation in a rat model of fragile X syndrome. Cerebral Cortex. 2016:1-15. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv331.
21. Canolty RT, Knight RT. The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010;14:506-15.
22. Jensen O, Mazaheri A. Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: gating by inhibition. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010;4:1-8.
23. Min B, Park H. Task-related modulation of anterior theta and posterior alpha EEG reflects top-down preparation. BMC Neurosci. 2010;11(79):1-8.
24. Radwan B, Dvorak D, Fenton AA. Impaired cognitive discrimination and discoordination of coupled theta-gamma oscillations in Fmr1 knockout mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;88:125-38.
25. Brown C, Dunn W. Adolescent-Adult Sensory Profile: user's manual. San Antonio: Therapy Skill Builders; 2002.
26. Rutter M, Bailey A, Lord C. SCQ: the Social Communication Questionnaire. Torrance: WPS; 2003.
27. Roid GH. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th edition (SB:V). Itasca: Riverside Publishing; 2003.
28. Wechsler D. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). San Antonio: TX Harcourt Assessment; 1999.
29. Orekhova E, Elsabbagh M, Jones E, Dawson G, Charman T, Johnson M, et al. EEG hyper-connectivity in high-risk infants is associated with later autism. J Neurodev Disord. 2014;6:1-11.
30. Jasper HH. The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1958;10:371-5.
31. Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134(1):9-21.
32. Nolan H, Whelan R, Reilly R. FASTER: Fully automated statistical thresholding for EEG artifact rejection. J Neurosci Methods. 2010;192:152-62.
33. Cantero J, Atienza M, Salas R. Human alpha oscillations in wakefulness, drowsiness period, and REM sleep: different electroencephalographic phenomena within the alpha band. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;32(1):54-71.
34. Groppe D, Urbach T, Kutas M. Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review. Psychophysiology. 2011;48(12):1711-25.
35. Vinck M, Oostenveld R, van Wingerden M, Battaglia F, Pennartz C. An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias. Neuroimage. 2011;55(4):1548-65.
36. Murias M, Webb S, Greenson J, Dawson G. Resting state cortical connectivity reflected in EEG coherence in individuals with autism. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62(3):270-3.
37. Jensen O, Colgin L. Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11(7):267-9.
38. Mazaheri A, Nieuwenhuis I, van Dijk H, Jensen O. Prestimulus alpha and mu activity predicts failure to inhibit motor responses. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30:1791-800.
39. Wang J, Barstein J, Ethridge LE, Mosconi M, Takarae Y, Sweeney J. Resting state EEG abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders. J Neurodev Disord. 2013;5:1-14.
40. Salkoff DB, Zagha E, Yüzgeç Ö, McCormick DA. Synaptic mechanisms of tight spike synchrony at gamma frequency in cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 2015;35(28):10236-51.
41. Hiyoshi T, Kambe D, Karasawa J, Chaki S. Differential effects of NMDA receptor antagonists at lower and higher doses on basal gamma band oscillation power in rat cortical electroencephalograms. Neuropharmacology. 2014;85:384-96.
42. Yun S, Trommer B. Fragile X mice: reduced long-term potentiation and N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor-Mediated neurotransmission in dentate gyrus. J Neurosci Res. 2011;89:176-82.
43. Eadie B, Cushman J, Kannangara T, Fanselow M, Christie B. NMDA receptor hypofunction in the dentate gyrus and impaired context discrimination in adult fmr1 knockout mice. Hippocampus. 2012;22:241-54.
44. Bostrom C, Majaess N, Morch K, White E, Christie B. Rescue of NMDAR-Dependent synaptic plasticity in Fmr1 knock-out mice. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25:271-9.
45. Von Stein A, Sarnthein J. Different frequencies for different scales of cortical integration: from local gamma to long range alpha/theta synchronization. Int J Psychophysiol. 2000;38(3):301-13.
46. Hughes SW, Crunelli V. Thalamic mechanisms of EEG alpha rhythms and their pathological implications. Neuroscientist. 2005;11(4):357-72.
47. Kopell N, Ermentrout G, Whittington M, Traub R. Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(4):1867-72.
48. Bullock T. Temporal fluctuations in coherence of brain waves. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:11568-72.
49. Kerkoerle T, Self M, Dagnino B, Gariel-Mathis M, Poort J, van der Togt C, et al. Alpha and gamma oscillations characterize feedback and feedforward processing in monkey visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:14332-41.
50. Başar E, Başar-Eroglu C, Karakaş S, Schürmann M. Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes. Int J Psychophysiol. 2001;39(2):241-8.
51. Jaušovec N, Jaušovec K. Correlations between ERP parameters and intelligence: a reconsideration. Biol Psychol. 2000;55(2):137-54.
52. Asada H, Fukuda Y, Tsunoda S, Yamaguchi M, Tonoike M. Frontal midline theta rhythms reflect alternative activation of prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex in humans. Neurosci Lett. 1999;274(1):29-32.
53. Hanslmayr S, Pastötter B, Bäuml K, Gruber S, Wimber M, Klimesch W. The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the Stroop task. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008;20(2):215-25.
54. D'Cruz A-M, Ragozzino ME, Mosconi MW, Pavuluri MN, Sweeney JA. Human reversal learning under conditions of certain versus uncertain outcomes. Neuroimage. 2011;56(1):315-22.
55. Wang C, Ulbert I, Schomer D, Marinkovic K, Halgren E. Responses of human anterior cingulate cortex microdomains to error detection, conflict monitoring, stimulus-response mapping, familiarity, and orienting. J Neurosci. 2005;25(3):604-13.
56. Benali A, Trippe J, Weiler E, Mix A, Petrasch-Parwez E, Girzalsky W, et al. Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation alters cortical inhibition. J Neurosci. 2011;31:1193-203.
57. Trippe J, Mix A, Aydin-Abidin S, Funke K, Benali A. Theta burst and conventional low-frequency rTMS differentially affect GABAergic neurotransmission in the rat cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2009;199:411-21.
58. Fanselow E, Richardson K, Connors B. Selective, state-dependent activation of somatostatin-expressing inhibitory interneurons in mouse neocortex. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:2640-52.
59. Feng Y, Gutekunst C, Eberhart D, Yi H, Warren S, Hersch S. Fragile X mental retardation protein: nucleocytoplasmic shuttling and association with somatodendritic ribosomes. J Neurosci. 1997;17:1539-47.
60. Lauterborn J, Christopher S, Kramár E, Chen L, Pandyarajan V, Lynch G, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor rescues synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. J Neurosci. 2007;27(40):10685-94.