Crowded contexts: On the affective dynamics of alcohol and other drug use in nightlife spaces

Contemporary Drug Problems

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 361-392

  Bøhling, Frederik ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Context; Crowd theory; Deleuze and Guattari; Denmark; Gabriel Tarde; Nightlife

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015708795     PISSN: 00914509     EISSN: 21631808     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009145091404100305     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Ahmed, S. (2008). Sociable happiness. Emotion, Space and Society, 1(1), 10-13.
2. Alliez, É. (2004). The difference and repetition of Gabriel Tarde. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 49-54.
3. Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the Urban. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4. Anderson, B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society, 2(2), 77-81.
5. Anderson, B., & P. Harrison (2006). Questioning affect and emotion. Area, 38(3), 333-335.
6. Borch, C. (2005). Urban imitations. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(3), 81-100.
7. Borch, C. (2006). The exclusion of the crowd: The destiny of a sociological figure of the irrational. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(1), 83-102.
8. Borch, C. (2012). The politics of crowds: An alternative history of sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Brown, R., & M. Gregg (2012). The pedagogy of regret: Facebook, binge drinking and young women. Continuum, 26(3), 357-369.
10. Brown, S. D. (2010) Preface. In C. B. Jensen (Ed.), Ontologies for developing things (pp. xi-xiii). Rotterdam; Boston; Taipei: Sense Publishers.
11. Canetti, E. (1984). Crowds and power. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.
12. Clough, P. T., & Halley, J. (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham: Duke University.
13. Davidson, J., Bondi, L., & Smit, M. (Eds.). (2005). Emotional geographies. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
14. Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
15. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
16. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1977). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. New York: Viking Press.
17. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1998). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
18. Demant, J. (2009). When alcohol acts: An actor-network approach to teenagers, alcohol and parties. Body & Society, 15(1), 25-46.
19. Demant, J. (2013). Affected in the nightclub. A case study of regular clubbers’ conflictual practices in nightclubs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24(3), 196-202.
20. Duff, C. (2007). Towards a theory of drug use contexts: Space, embodiment and practice. Addiction Research & Theory, 15(5), 503-519.
21. Duff, C. (2010). On the role of affect and practice in the production of place. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(5), 881-895.
22. Duff, C. (2011). Reassembling (social) contexts: New directions for a sociology of drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22(6), 404-406.
23. Duff, C. (2012). Accounting for context: Exploring the role of objects and spaces in the consumption of alcohol and other drugs. Social & Cultural Geography, 13(2), 145-159.
24. Duff, C. (2013). The social life of drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24(3), 167-172.
25. Duff, C. (2014). The place and time of drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(3), 633-639. 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.10.014
26. Dwyer, R., & Moore, D. (2013). Enacting multiple methamphetamines: The ontological politics of public discourse and consumer accounts of a drug and its effects. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24(3), 203-211.
27. Edensor, T. (2012). Illuminated atmospheres: Anticipating and reproducing the flow of affective experience in Blackpool. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(6), 1103-1122.
28. Fitzgerald, J. (1998). An assemblage of desire, drugs and techno. Angelaki, 3(2), 41-57.
29. Fox, N. J. (2002). What a ‘risky’ body can do:Why people’s health choices are not all based in evidence. Health Education Journal, 61(2), 166-179.
30. Fraser, S., & Moore, D. (2011). Governing through problems: The formulation of policy on amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS) in Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22(6), 498-506.
31. Gane, N. (2009). Concepts and the ʼnew’ empiricism. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 83-97.
32. Gibbs, A. (2011). Panic! Affect contagion, mimesis and suggestion in the social field. Cultural Studies Review, 14(2), 130-145.
33. Gomart, E. (2004). Surprised by methadone: In praise of drug substitution treatment in a French clinic. Body & Society, 10(2-3), 85-110.
34. Gregg, M. & Seigworth, G. J. (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
35. Griffin, C., et al. (2009). “Everytime I do it I absolutely annihilate myself”: Loss of (self-) consciousness and loss of memory in young people’s drinking narratives. Sociology, 43(3), 457-467.
36. Henriques, J. (2010). The vibrations of affect and their propagation on a night out on Kingston’s dancehall scene. Body & Society, 16(1), 57-89.
37. Houborg, E. (2012). The political pharmacology of methadone and heroin in Danish drug policy. Contemporary Drug Problems, 39(1), 155-192.
38. Hubbard, P. (2005). The geographies of ‘going out’: Emotion and embodiment in the evening economy. In J. Davidson, L. Bondi, & M. Smit (Eds.), Emotional geographies (pp. 117-134). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
39. Jayne, M., Valentine, G., & Holloway, S.L. (2010). Emotional, embodied and affective geographies of alcohol, drinking and drunkenness. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(4), 1-15.
40. Jordan, T. (1995). Collective bodies: Raving and the politics of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari. Body & Society, 1(1), 125-144.
41. Keane, H. (2005). Addiction and the bioethics of difference. In M. Shildrick & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), Ethics of the Body: Postconventional Challenges (pp. 91-112). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Keane, H. (2011). The politics of visibility: Drug users and the spaces of drug use. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22(6), 407-409.
43. Krarup, T. M., & Blok, A. (2011). Unfolding the social: Quasi-actants, virtual theory, and the new empiricism of Bruno Latour. The Sociological Review, 59(1), 42-63.
44. Latham, A., & McCormack, D. P. (2004). Moving cities: rethinking the materialities of urban geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 28(6), 701-724.
45. Latour, B. (2000). When things strike back: A possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 107-123.
46. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
48. Maffesoli, M. (1993). The shadow of Dionysus: A contribution to the sociology of the orgy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
49. Maffesoli, M. (1996). The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Malbon, B. (1999). Clubbing. London: Routledge.
51. Malins, P. (2004). Machinic assemblages: Deleuze, Guattari and an ethicoaesthetics of drug use. Janus Head, 7(1), 84-104.
52. Malins, P., Fitzgerald, J. L., & Threadgold, T. (2006). Spatial ‘folds’: The entwining of bodies, risks and city spaces for women injecting drug users in Melbourne’s Central Business District. Gender, Place & Culture, 13(5), 509-527.
53. Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
54. Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 74-89). Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell and the Sociological Review.
55. Moore, D., & Dietze, P. (2005). Enabling environments and the reduction of drug-related harm: Re-framing Australian policy and practice. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24(3), 275-284.
56. Moore, D., & Fraser, S. (2006). Putting at risk what we know: Reflecting on the drug-using subject in harm reduction and its political implications. Social Science & Medicine, 62(12), 3035-3047.
57. Oksanen, A. (2013). Deleuze and the Theory of Addiction. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 45(1), 57-67.
58. Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Press.
59. Race, K. (2011a). Drug effects, performativity and the law. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22(6), 410-412.
60. Race, K. (2011b). Party animals: The significance of drug practices in the materialization of urban gay identity. In S. Fraser & D. Moore (Eds.), The drug effect: Health, crime and society (pp. 35-56). Port Melbourne, Victoria: Cambridge University Press.
61. Rhodes, T. (2009). Risk environments and drug harms: A social science for harm reduction approach. International Journal of Drug Policy, 20(3), 193-201.
62. Sampson, T. D. (2012). Virality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
63. St John, G. (2006). “Electronic dance music culture and religion: An overview.” Culture and Religion, 7(1), 1-25.
64. Tan, Q. H. (2013). Flirtatious geographies: Clubs as spaces for the performance of affective heterosexualities. Gender, Place & Culture, 20(6), 718-736.
65. Tarde, G. (1903). Inter-psychology, the inter-play of human minds. International Quarterly, 7, 59-84.
66. Tarde, G. (1962). The laws of imitation. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
67. Tarde, G., & Clark, T.N. (1969). On communication and social influence: Selected papers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68. Tarde, G. (2013). Conviction and the crowd. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 14(2), 232-239.
69. Thrift, N. J. (2006). Space. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2-3), 139-146.
70. Thrift, N. J. (2008a). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.
71. Thrift, N. J. (2008b). Pass it on: Towards a political economy of propensity. Emotion, Space and Society, 1(2), 83-96.
72. Tutenges, S. (2010). Louder! Wilder!: Danish youth at an international nightlife resort. Copenhagen: Department of Sociology, Copenhagen University.
73. Tutenges, S. (2013). Stirring up effervescence: An ethnographic study of youth at a nightlife resort. Leisure Studies, 32(3), 233-248.
74. Tutenges, S., & Sandberg, S. (2013). Intoxicating stories: The characteristics, contexts and implications of drinking stories among Danish youth. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24(6), 538-544. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.03.011
75. Vargas, E. V. (2012). Tarde on drugs, or measures against suicide. In M. Candea (Ed.), The social after Gabriel Tarde: Debates and assessments (pp. 208-229). New York: Routledge.
76. Vitellone, N. (2011). The science of the syringe. Feminist Theory, 12(2), 201-207.
77. Zinberg, N. E. (1984). Drug, set, and setting: The basis for controlled intoxicant use. New Haven: Yale University Press.