Something for everyone: Journals and other scientific organizations produce a diverse variety of plain-language summaries

eLife

Volumn 6, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Sarah, Shailes ^a  

^a eLife   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNDING; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NOTE; ONLINE SYSTEM; OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING; PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; WRITING; WRITTEN COMMUNICATION;

EID: 85015695832     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.25411     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Hanson B. 2016. AGU journals: more content and more context. Eos 97. doi: 10.1029/2016EO057345
2. Jelicic Kadic A, Fidahic M, Vujcic M, Saric F, Propadalo I, Marelja I, Dosenovic S, Puljak L. 2016. Cochrane plain language summaries are highly heterogeneous with low adherence to the standards. BMC Medical Research Methodology 16:61. doi: 10. 1186/s12874-016-0162-y, PMID: 27216616
3. Nature. 2016. Nature distilled. Nature 534:296. doi: 10.1038/534296b, PMID: 27306152
4. Noor MAF. 2017. The (R)Evolution is here!. Evolution 71:4–5. doi: 10.1111/evo.13131
5. Sanders N. 2013. Astrobites: students making astrophysics accessible. Scientific American Blog Network. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/incubator/astrobites-students-making-astrophysics-accessible/[Accessed 3 Feb, 2017].
6. Verma IM. 2012. Refining a successful experiment. PNAS 109:13469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212313109, PMID: 3427102