Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations

Sports Medicine

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 1821-1845

  Migueles, Jairo H ^a   Cadenas Sanchez, Cristina ^a   Ekelund, Ulf ^b,c   Delisle Nyström, Christine ^d   Mora Gonzalez, Jose ^a   Löf, Marie ^d,e   Labayen, Idoia ^f   Ruiz, Jonatan R ^a,d   Ortega, Francisco B ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF SPORT SCIENCES   (Norway)

^c MRC EPIDEMIOLOGY UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^d KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^e LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^f UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; ADOLESCENT; AGED; CHILD; ENERGY METABOLISM; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEWBORN; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; SLEEP;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADOLESCENT; AGED; CHILD; ENERGY METABOLISM; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; SLEEP;

EID: 85015687711     PISSN: 01121642     EISSN: 11792035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0716-0     Document Type: Review

References (110)

1. Warburton DER, Nicol CW, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006;174:801–9.
2. Fletcher G, Balady G, Blair S, et al. Statement on exercise: benefits and recommendations for physical activity programs for all Americans. Circulation. 1996;94:857–62.
3. Janssen I, Leblanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:40.
4. Warren JM, Ekelund U, Besson H, et al. Assessment of physical activity—a review of methodologies with reference to epidemiological research: a report of the exercise physiology section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17:127–39.
5. Bassett DR, Rowlands A, Trost SG. Calibration and validation of wearable monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:32–8.
6. Rothney MP, Brychta RJ, Meade NN, et al. Validation of the ActiGraph two-regression model for predicting energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1785–92.
7. Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14:411–6.
8. Baranowski T, Dworkin RJ, Cieslik CJ, et al. Reliability and validity of self-report of aerobic activity—Family Health Project. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1984;55:309–17.
9. Sallis JF. Self-report measures of children’s physical activity. J Sch Health. 1991;61:215–9.
10. Sirard JR, Pate RR. Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Sports Med. 2001;31:439–54.
11. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard JR. Calibration of the computer science and applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:777–81.
12. Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, et al. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 2008;26:1557–65.
13. Hänggi JM, Phillips LRS, Rowlands AV. Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16:40–4. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2012.05.012.
14. Copeland JL, Esliger DW. Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in active, healthy older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2009;17:17–30.
15. Chandler JL, Brazendale K, Beets MW, et al. Classification of physical activity intensities using a wrist-worn accelerometer in 8- to 12-year-old children. Pediatr Obes. 2015;11(2):120–7. doi:10.1111/ijpo.12033.
16. Sadeh A, Sharkey KM, Carskadon MA. Activity-based sleep-wake identification: an empirical test of methodological issues. Sleep. 1994;17(3):201–6.
17. Cole RJ, Kripke DF, Gruen W, et al. Automatic sleep/wake identification from wrist activity. Sleep. 1992;15:461–9.
18. Tudor-Locke C, Barreira TV, Schuna JM, et al. Fully automated waist-worn accelerometer algorithm for detecting children’s sleep-period time separate from 24-h physical activity or sedentary behaviors. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2014;39:53–7.
19. Barreira TV, Schuna JM, Mire EF, et al. Identifying children’s nocturnal sleep using 24-h waist accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000486.
20. Crouter SE, Horton M, Bassett DR. Use of a two-regression model for estimating energy expenditure in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:1177–85.
21. Trost SG, Ward DS, Moorehead SM, et al. Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:629–33.
22. Hildebrand M, Van Hees VT, Hansen BH, et al. Age-group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(9):1816–24. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000289.
23. Fairclough SJ, Noonan R, Rowlands AV, et al. Wear compliance and activity in children wearing wrist and hip-mounted accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(2):245–53. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000771.
24. Staudenmayer J, He S, Hickey A, et al. Methods to estimate aspects of physical activity and sedentary behavior from high frequency wrist accelerometer measurements. J Appl Physiol. 2015. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00026.2015.
25. Wijndaele K, Westgate K, Stephens SK, et al. Utilization and harmonization of adult accelerometry data. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(10):2129–39.
26. Aguilar-Farias N, Brown WJ, Peeters GM. ActiGraph GT3X+ cut-points for identifying sedentary behaviour in older adults in free-living environments. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17:293–6. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2013.07.002.
27. Santos-Lozano A, Santín-Medeiros F, Cardon G, et al. Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34:975–82.
28. Ellis K, Kerr J, Godbole S, et al. A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers. Physiol Meas. 2014;35:2191–203.
29. Kim Y, Lee JM, Peters BP, et al. Examination of different accelerometer cut-points for assessing sedentary behaviors in children. PLoS One. 2014;9:1–8.
30. Keadle SK, Shiroma EJ, Freedson PS, et al. Impact of accelerometer data processing decisions on the sample size, wear-time and physical activity level of a large cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1210.
31. Cain KL, Sallis JF, Conway TL, et al. Using accelerometers in youth physical activity studies: a review of methods. J Phys Act Health. 2013;10:437–50.
32. Booth A, Clarke M, Dooley G, et al. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2012;1:2.
33. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Reprinted from Annals of Internal Medicine). Phys Ther. 2009;89:873–80.
34. Johansson E, Ekelund U, Nero H, et al. Calibration and cross-validation of a wrist-worn ActiGraph in young preschoolers. Pediatr Obes. 2015;10(1):1–6. doi:10.1111/j.2047-6310.2013.00213.x.
35. Costa S, Barber SE, Cameron N, et al. Calibration and validation of the ActiGraph GT3X+ in 2–3 year olds. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;17:617–22. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2013.11.005.
36. Tudor-Locke C, Barreira TV, Schuna JM, et al. Improving wear-time compliance with a 24-h waist-worn accelerometer protocol in the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):1–9.
37. Crouter SE, Flynn JI, Bassett DR. Estimating physical activity in youth using a wrist accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:944–7.
38. Romanzini M, Petroski EL, Ohara D, et al. Calibration of ActiGraph GT3X, Actical and RT3 accelerometers in adolescents. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(1):91–9. doi:10.1080/17461391.2012.732614.
39. Hjorth MF, Chaput JP, Damsgaard CT, et al. Measure of sleep and physical activity by a single accelerometer: can a waist-worn ActiGraph adequately measure sleep in children? Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2012;10:328–35.
40. Aadland E, Ylvisåker E. Reliability of the ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer in adults under free-living conditions. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134606. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134606.
41. Ozemek C, Kirschner MM, Wilkerson BS, et al. Intermonitor reliability of the GT3X + accelerometer at hip, wrist and ankle sites during activities of daily living. Physiol Meas. 2014;35:129–38.
42. Ellis K, Kerr J, Godbole S, et al. Hip and wrist accelerometer algorithms for free-living behavior classification. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(5):933–40. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000840.
43. Stec MJ, Rawson ES. Estimation of resistance exercise energy expenditure using triaxial accelerometry. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26:1413–22.
44. Tudor-Locke C, Barreira TV, Schuna JM. Comparison of step outputs for waist and wrist accelerometer attachment sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;47(4):839.
45. Choi L, Ward SC, Schnelle JF, et al. Assessment of wear/nonwear-time classification algorithms for triaxial accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:2009–16.
46. Brønd C, Arvidsson D. Sampling frequency affects the processing of ActiGraph raw acceleration data to activity counts. J Appl Physiol. 2016;120(3):362–9. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00628.2015.
47. Toftager M, Kristensen PL, Oliver M, et al. Accelerometer data reduction in adolescents: effects on sample retention and bias. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:140.
48. Freedson PS, John D. Comment on “Estimating activity and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer on the hip and wrist”. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45:962–3.
49. Aadland E, Ylvisåker E. Reliability of objectively measured sedentary time and physical activity in adults. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133296. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133296.
50. Donaldson SC, Montoye AHK, Tuttle MS, et al. Variability of objectively measured sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(4):755–61. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000828.
51. Lyden K, Kozey Keadle SL, Staudenmayer JW, et al. Validity of two wearable monitors to estimate breaks from sedentary time. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:2243–52.
52. Ried-Larsen M, Brønd JC, Brage S, et al. Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the ActiGraph activity monitor. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:1–10. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-113.
53. Cain KL, Conway TL, Adams MA, et al. Comparison of older and newer generations of ActiGraph accelerometers with the normal filter and the low frequency extension. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:51.
54. Cellini N, Buman MP, McDevitt EA, et al. Direct comparison of two actigraphy devices with polysomnographically recorded naps in healthy young adults. Chronobiol Int. 2013;30:691–8.
55. Wanner M, Martin BW, Meier F, et al. Effects of filter choice in GT3X accelerometer assessments of free-living activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45:170–7.
56. Barreira TV, Brouillette RM, Foil HC, et al. Comparison of older adults steps/day using NL-1000 pedometer and two GTX+ accelerometer filters. J Aging Phys Act. 2012;21:402–16.
57. Jimmy G, Seiler R, Mäder U. Development and validation of GT3X accelerometer cut-off points in 5- to 9-year-old children based on indirect calorimetry measurements. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Sport und Sport. 2013;61:37–43.
58. Kahan D, Nicaise V, Reuben K. Convergent validity of four accelerometer cutpoints with direct observation of preschool children’s outdoor physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84:59–67. doi:10.1080/02701367.2013.762294.
59. Aibar A, Bois JE, Zaragoza J, et al. Do epoch lengths affect adolescents’ compliance with physical activity guidelines? J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2014;54:255–63.
60. Peeters G, van Gellecum Y, Ryde G, et al. Is the pain of activity log-books worth the gain in precision when distinguishing wear and non-wear-time for tri-axial accelerometers? J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16:515–9. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2012.12.002.
61. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, et al. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:181–8.
62. Choi L, Liu Z, Matthews E, et al. Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear-time classification algorithm. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;43:357–64.
63. Katzmarzyk PT, Barreira TV, Broyles ST, et al. The International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE): design and methods. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:900–13.
64. Janssen X, Cliff DP, Reilly JJ, et al. Predictive validity and classification accuracy of ActiGraph energy expenditure equations and cut-points in young children. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79124–9.
65. Sirard JR, Trost SG, Pfeiffer KA, et al. Calibration and evaluation of an objective measure of physical activity in preschool children. J Phys Act Health. 2005;2:345–57.
66. Reilly JJ, Coyle J, Kelly L, et al. An objective method for measurement of sedentary behavior in 3- to 4-year olds. Obes Res. 2003;11:1155–8.
67. Pate RR, Almeida MJ, McIver KL, et al. Validation and calibration of an accelerometer in preschool children. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14:2000–6.
68. Puyau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, et al. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obes Res. 2002;10:150–7.
69. Van Cauwenberghe E, Gubbels J, De Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. Feasibility and validity of accelerometer measurements to assess physical activity in toddlers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:67.
70. Pulakka A, Cheung YB, Ashorn U, et al. Feasibility and validity of the ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer in measuring physical activity of Malawian toddlers. Acta Paediatr Int J Paediatr. 2013;102:1192–8.
71. Butte NF, Wong WW, Lee JS, et al. Prediction of energy expenditure and physical activity in preschoolers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46:1216–26.
72. Zhu Z, Chen P, Zhuang J. Intensity classification accuracy of accelerometer-measured physical activities in Chinese children and youth. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84:S4–11. doi:10.1080/02701367.2013.850919.
73. Vanhelst J, Béghin L, Turck D, et al. New validated thresholds for various intensities of physical activity in adolescents using the ActiGraph accelerometer. Int J Rehabil Res. 2011;34:175–7.
74. Freedson P, Pober D, Janz KF. Calibration of accelerometer output for children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:523–30.
75. Mattocks C, Leary S, Ness A, et al. Calibration of an accelerometer during free-living activities in children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2007;2:218–26.
76. Peterson NE, Sirard JR, Kulbok PA, et al. Validation of accelerometer thresholds and inclinometry for measurement of sedentary behavior in young adult university students. Res Nurs Health. 2015;38:492–8. doi:10.1002/nur.21694.
77. Rowlands AV, Rennie K, Kozarski R, et al. Children’s physical activity assessed with wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;2006:2308–16.
78. Aittasalo M, Vähä-Ypyä H, Vasankari T, et al. Mean amplitude deviation calculated from raw acceleration data: a novel method for classifying the intensity of adolescents’ physical activity irrespective of accelerometer brand. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015;7:18. doi:10.1186/s13102-015-0010-0.
79. Kozey-Keadle S, Libertine A, Lyden K, et al. Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1561–7.
80. Vähä-Ypyä H, Vasankari T, Husu P, et al. A universal, accurate intensity-based classification of different physical activities using raw data of accelerometer. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2015;35(1):64–70. doi:10.1111/cpf.12127.
81. Zakeri IF, Adolph AL, Puyau MR, et al. Cross-sectional time series and multivariate adaptive regression splines models using accelerometry and heart rate predict energy expenditure of preschoolers. J Nutr. 2013;143:114–22.
82. Zhu Z, Chen P, Zhuang J. Predicting Chinese children and youth’s energy expenditure using ActiGraph accelerometers: a calibration and cross-validation study. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84:S56–63. doi:10.1080/02701367.2013.850989.
83. Meredith-Jones K, Williams S, Galland B, et al. 24 h accelerometry: impact of sleep-screening methods on estimates of sedentary behaviour and physical activity while awake. J Sports Sci. 2015;414:1–7. doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1068438.
84. Rosenberger ME, Buman MP, Haskell WL, et al. Twenty-four hours of sleep, sedentary behavior, and physical activity with nine wearable devices. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(3):457–65. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000778.
85. Kaplan RF, Wang Y, Loparo KA, et al. Performance evaluation of an automated single-channel sleep-wake detection algorithm. Nat Sci Sleep. 2014;6:113–22. doi:10.2147/NSS.S71159.
86. Slater JA, Botsis T, Walsh J, et al. Assessing sleep using hip and wrist actigraphy. Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2015;13(2):172–8. doi:10.1111/sbr.12103.
87. Zinkhan M, Berger K, Hense S, et al. Agreement of different methods for assessing sleep characteristics: a comparison of two actigraphs, wrist and hip placement, and self-report with polysomnography. Sleep Med. 2014;15(9):1107–14. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2014.04.015.
88. Trost SG, Mciver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:531–43.
89. Tryon WW, Williams R. Fully proportional actigraphy: a new instrument. Behav Res Methods Instru Comput. 1996;28:392–403.
90. Cavagna GA, Franzetti P. The determinants of the step frequency in walking in humans. J Physiol. 1986;373:235–42.
91. Cavagna GA, Willems PA, Franzetti P, et al. The two power limits conditioning step frequency in human running. J Physiol. 1991;437:95–108.
92. John D, Miller R, Kozey-Keadle S, et al. Biomechanical examination of the “plateau phenomenon” in ActiGraph vertical activity counts. Physiol Meas. 2012;33:219–30.
93. Robusto KM, Trost SG. Comparison of three generations of ActiGraph™ activity monitors in children and adolescents. J Sports Sci. 2012;30:1429–35.
94. Grydeland M, Hansen BH, Ried-Larsen M, et al. Comparison of three generations of ActiGraph activity monitors under free-living conditions: do they provide comparable assessments of overall physical activity in 9-year old children? BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2014;6:26.
95. Treuth MS, Schmitz K, Catellier DJ, et al. Defining accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1259–66.
96. Ridgers ND, Salmon J, Ridley K, et al. Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children’s sedentary time. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:15.
97. Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, et al. Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:875–81.
98. Metzger JS, Catellier DJ, Evenson KR, et al. Patterns of objectively measured physical activity in the United States. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:630–8.
99. Davis MG, Fox KR. Physical activity patterns assessed by accelerometry in older people. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;100:581–9.
100. Andersen LB, Harro M, Sardinha LB, et al. Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: a cross-sectional study (The European Youth Heart Study). Yearb Sport Med. 2006;368:299–304.
101. Van Cauwenberghe E, Labarque V, Trost SG, et al. Calibration and comparison of accelerometer cut points in preschool children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:e582–9.
102. Grydeland M, Bergh IH, Bjelland M, et al. Correlates of weight status among Norwegian 11-year-olds: the HEIA study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1053.
103. Matthews C. Calibration for accelerometer output for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;S512:S512–22.
104. Pruitt LA, Glynn NW, King AC, et al. Use of accelerometry to measure physical activity in older adults at risk for mobility disability. J Aging Phys Act. 2008;16:416–34.
105. Zisko N, Carlsen T, Salvesen Ø, et al. New relative intensity ambulatory accelerometer thresholds for elderly men and women: the Generation 100 study. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:97.
106. Crouter SE, Churilla JR, Bassett DR. Estimating energy expenditure using accelerometers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;98:601–12.
107. Crouter SE, Kuffel E, Haas JD, et al. Refined two-regression model for the ActiGraph accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1029–37.
108. Liu S, Gao RX, Freedson PS. Computational methods for estimating energy expenditure in human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:2138–46.
109. Schmitz KH, Treuth M, Hannan P, et al. Predicting energy expenditure from accelerometry counts in adolescents girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:155–61.
110. Mâsse LC, Fuemmeler BF, Anderson CB, et al. Accelerometer data reduction: a comparison of four reduction algorithms on select outcome variables. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S544–54.