Perceived System Performance:A Test of an Extended Technology Acceptance Model

Data Base for Advances in Information Systems

Volumn 37, Issue , 2006, Pages 51-59

  Liu, Liping ^a   Ma, Qingxiong ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic Medical Records; Perceived System Performance; Technology Acceptance Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015585427     PISSN: 00950033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1161345.1161354     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Andress, M. (2001). “Internal SLAs Benefit the Entire Company,” InfoWorld, Vol. 23, Issue18, p. 52.
3. Bailey, J.E. and Pearson, S.W. (1983). “Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction,” Management Science, Vol. 29, pp. 530–545.
4. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). “The Moderator- Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 1173–1182.
5. Churchil, G.A. and Surprenant, C. (1982). “An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, pp. 491–504.
6. Davis, F. (1986). Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
7. Davis, F.D. (1989). “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, pp. 319–340.
8. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R. (1989). “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science, Vol. 35, pp. 982–1003.
9. Davis, G.B., and Olson, M.H. (1985). Management in Formation Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure, and Development, New York: McGraw- Hill.
10. Doll, WJ. and Torkzadeh, G. (1988). “The Measurement of End User Computing Satisfaction,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 12, pp. 259–274.
11. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
12. Fisher, R. (1959). Smoking: The Cancer Controversy, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
13. Gefen, D. and Keil, M. (1998). “The Impact of Developer Responsiveness on Perceptions of Usefulness and Ease of Use: An Extension of the Technology of the Technology Acceptance Model,” DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 29, pp. 35–49.
14. Gefen, D. and Straub, D. (2000). “The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease-of-Use in Is Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption,” Journal of Association on Information Systems, Vol. 1, pp. 8.
15. Halstead, D., Hartman, D., and Schmidt, S.L. (1994). “Multisource Effects on the Satisfaction Formation Process,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 22, pp. 114–129.
16. Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., and Cavaye, A.L.M. (1997). “Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, pp. 279–305.
17. Johnson, M.D. (1998). Customer Orientation and Market Action, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prince Hall.
18. Lederer, A.L., Maupin, D.J., Sena, M.P., and Zhuang, Y. (2000). “The Technology Acceptance Model and the World Wide Web,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 29, pp. 269–282.
19. Legris, P., Ingham, J., and Collerette, P. (2003). “Why Do People Use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model,” Information & Management, Vol. 40, pp. 191–204.
20. Levi, M.D. and Conrad, F.G. (1996). “A Heuristic Evaluation of a World Wide Web Prototype,” Interactions, Vol. 3, pp. 50–61.
21. Locke, E.A. (1976). “The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction.,” in Dunnette, M.D. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston, pp. 1297–1349.
22. Ma, Q. and Liu, L. (2004). “The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings,” Journal of End User Computing, Vol. 16, pp. 59–72.
23. MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S., and Hong, S. (1999). “Sample Size in Factor Analysis,” Psychological Methods, Vol. 4, pp. 84–99.
24. Nunnally, J.C. (1967). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Oliver, R.L. (1981). “Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Process in Retail Settings,” Journal of Retailing, Vol. 57, pp. 25–48.
26. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Pitt, L.F., Watson, R.T., and Kavan, C.B. (1995). “Service Quality: A Measure of Information Systems Effectiveness,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, pp. 173–187.
28. Pitt, L.F., Watson, R.T., and Kavan, C.B. (1997). “Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Concerns for a Complete Canvas,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, pp. 209–221.
29. Shankaranarayanan, N.K., Jiang, Z., and Mishra, P. (2001). “User-perceived performance of web browsing and interactive data in HFC cable access networks”, ICC 2001 - IEEE International Conference on Communications, No. 1, pp. 1264 1268.
30. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., and Scheines, R. (1993). Causation, Prediction, and Search, New York: Springer-Verlag.
31. Straub, D.W. (1994). “The Effect of Culture on It Diffusion: E-Mail and Fax in Japan and the U.S.,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 5, pp. 23–47.
32. Sturm, R., Morris, W., and Jander, M. (2000). Foundations of Service Level Management, Indianapolis, IN.: Sams.
33. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. (1995). “Assessing It Usage: The Role of Prior Experience,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, pp. 561–570.
34. Triandis, H.C. (1979). “Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behaviors,” in Page, M.M. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values, Lincoln, NE.: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 195–259.
35. Venkatesh, V. (2000). “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into Technology Acceptance Model,” Information System Research, Vol. 11, pp. 342–365.
36. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (1996). “A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 27, pp. 451–481.
37. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000). “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science, Vol. 46, pp. 186–204.
38. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., and Davis, F.D. (2003). “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, pp. 425–478.
39. Waegemann, P.C. (2002). Status Report 2002: Electronic Health Records, Technical Report, Chicago, IL: Medical Records Institute.
40. Whittaker, J. (1990). Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics, New York: Wiley.