Engineering management or management of technology? A bibliometric study of ieee tem

International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 63-70

  Pilkington, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bibliometric; Engineering management; Management of technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015531746     PISSN: 17509653     EISSN: 17509661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17509653.2008.10671036     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Borgatti, S., Everett, M., and Freeman, L., 2002. Ucinet for windows:Software for social network analysis, Harvard, MA:Analytic Technologies. in
2. Cottrill, C., Rogers, E., and Mills, T., 1989. Co-citation analysis of the scientific literature of innovation research traditions:Diffusion of innovations and technology transfer. Knowledge:Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 11 (2):181–208.
3. Culnan, M., 1986. The intellectual development of management information systems. Management Science, 32:156–172.
4. Karki, R., 1996. Searching for bridges between disciplines:An author co-citation analysis on the research into scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 22 (5):323–334.
5. Persson, O., 2003. Bibexcel:A toolbox for bibliometricians Http://www.umu.se/inforsk. Accessed:29th October.
6. Pilkington, A., and Liston-Heyes, C., 1999. Is production and operations management a discipline? a citation/co-citation study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19 (1):7–20.
7. Pilkington, A., and Teichert, T., 2006. Management of technology:Themes, concepts and relationships. Technovation, 26 (3):288–299.
8. Scott, J., 1991. Social Network Analysis:A Handbook, London:Sage Publications.
9. Sharplin, A., and Mabry, R., 1985. The relative importance of journals used in management research:An alternative ranking. Human Relations, 38:139–149.
10. Small, H., 1973. Co-citation in the scientific literature:A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24:265–269.
11. Tichy, N., Tushman, M., and Fombrun, C., 1979. Social network analysis for organisations. Academy of Management Review, 4 (2):507–519.
12. Usdiken, B., and Pasadeos, Y., 1995. Organizational analysis in north america and europe:A comparison of co-citation networks. Organisation Studies, 16 (3):503–526.
13. White, H., and Griffith, B., 1981. Author cocitation:A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (3):163–171.