메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 41, Issue , 2017, Pages e38-

Should a scientist be prevented from publishing in a journal for which he works?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIST; ETHICS; INTERNAL MEDICINE; STANDARDS;

EID: 85015361967     PISSN: 09536205     EISSN: 18790828     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.03.008     Document Type: Letter
Times cited : (4)

References (4)
  • 1
    • 85019795951 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Should scholars publish in the journal they are working for?
    • Charlier, P., Should scholars publish in the journal they are working for?. J Brief Ideas, 2017, 10.5281/zenodo.344615.
    • (2017) J Brief Ideas
    • Charlier, P.1
  • 2
    • 84891379024 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals
    • []
    • ICJME, Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. 2015 [ http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf].
    • (2015)
    • ICJME1
  • 3
    • 84995785837 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Single-blind vs double-blind review in the setting of author prestige
    • Okike, K., Hug, K.T., Kocher, M.S., Leopold, S.S., Single-blind vs double-blind review in the setting of author prestige. JAMA 316 (2016), 1315–1316.
    • (2016) JAMA , vol.316 , pp. 1315-1316
    • Okike, K.1    Hug, K.T.2    Kocher, M.S.3    Leopold, S.S.4
  • 4
    • 84977634060 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Let's make peer review scientific
    • Rennie, D., Let's make peer review scientific. Nature 535 (2016), 31–33.
    • (2016) Nature , vol.535 , pp. 31-33
    • Rennie, D.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.