Entangling power of quantum evolutions

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 4-

  Zanardi, Paolo ^a,b   Zalka, Christof ^a   Faoro, Lara ^b  

^a ISI FOUNDATION   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015352587     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.030301     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. For reviews, see D.P. DiVincenzo and C. Bennet, Nature (London) 404, 247 (2000);
2. A. Steane, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 117 (1998).
3. D. Deutsch, A. Barenco, and A. Ekert, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 449, 669 (1995);
4. D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 51, 1015 (1995).
5. S. Bose, e-print quant-ph/0003072.
6. K. Kraus, States, Effects, and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 190 (Springer, Berlin, 1983).
7. L.M. Duan and G.C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953 (1997);
8. Phys. Rev. Lett.P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, 79, 3306 (1997).
9. The subsystems composing our bipartite system could be on their own multipartite. In this case most of the (Formula presented)’s (Formula presented) will be entangled, and in this sense “difficult” to produce.
10. J.F. Cornwell, Group Theory in Physics (Academic, New York, 1984), Vol. I.
11. Since our constructions for achieving the bound have a rather number theoretic character, it is still imaginable that there are more exceptions at specific higher dimensions.