This is an intervention: Foregrounding and operationalizing ethics during technology design

Emerging Pervasive Information and Communication Technologies (PICT): Ethical Challenges, Opportunities and Safeguards

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 177-192

  Shilton, Katie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PRODUCT DESIGN; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

COMPETING DESIGNS; DESIGN PRACTICE; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; ETHICAL CONCERNS; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; PARTICIPANT OBSERVATIONS; SOCIAL SCIENTISTS; TECHNOLOGY DESIGNS;

PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

EID: 85015281880     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6833-8_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Bannon, L. 2006. Forgetting as a feature, not a bug: The duality of memory and implications for ubiquitous computing. CoDesign 2(1): 3-15.
2. Blanchette, J.-F., and D.G. Johnson. 2002. Data retention and the panoptic society: The social benefits of forgetfulness. The Information Society 18(1): 33-45.
3. Csikszentmihalyi, M., and R. Larson. 1987. Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 175(9): 526-536.
4. Fisher, E. 2007. Ethnographic invention: Probing the capacity of laboratory decisions. NanoEthics 1(2): 155-165.
5. Fisher, E., and R. Mahajan. 2010. Embedding the humanities in engineering: Art, dialogue, and a laboratory. In Trading zones and interactional expertise: Creating new kinds of collaboration, ed. M.E. Gorman, 209-230. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Friedman, B. (ed.). 1997. Human values and the design of computer technology, CSLI lecture notes. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Friedman, B., P.H. Kahn, and A. Borning. 2006. Value sensitive design and information systems. In Human-computer interaction and management information systems: Applications, vol. 6, ed. D. Galletta and P. Zhang. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
8. Guston, D.H., and D. Sarewitz. 2002. Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society 24(1-2): 93-109.
9. Hara, N., and H. Rosenbaum. 2008. Revising the conceptualization of computerization movements. The Information Society 24(4): 229-245.
10. Herkert, J. 2001. Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics 7(3): 403-414.
11. Hicks, J., N. Ramanathan, H. Falaki, B. Longstaff, K. Parameswaran, M. Monibi, D.H. Kim, et al. 2011. Ohmage: An open mobility system for activity and experience sampling (CENS Technical Report No. 100). Los Angeles: Center for Embedded Networked Sensing.
12. Hollander, R.D., and N.H. Steneck. 1990. Science- and engineering-related ethics and values studies: Characteristics of an emerging field of research. Science, Technology & Human Values 15(1): 84-104. doi: 10.1177/016224399001500109.
13. Johnson, D.G. 2000. Computer ethics, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
14. Johnson, D.G. 2007. Ethics and technology “in the making”: An essay on the challenge of nanoethics. NanoEthics 1(1): 21-30.
15. Johnson, D.G. 2010. The role of ethics in science and engineering. Trends in Biotechnology 28(12): 589-590.
16. Johnson, D.G. 2011. Software agents, anticipatory ethics, and accountability. In The growing gap between emerging technologies and legal-ethical oversight: The pacing problem, ed. Gary E. Marchant, Braden R. Allenby, and Joseph R. Herkert, 61-76. Dordrecht: Springer.
17. Kling, R., and S. Iacono. 1988. The mobilization of support for computerization: The role of computerization movements. Social Problems 35(3): 226-243.
18. Knobel, C.P., and G.C. Bowker. 2011. Values in design. Communications of the ACM 54(7): 26-28.
19. Latour, B. 2008. A cautious prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design (with special attention to Peter Sloterdijk). In Proceedings of the 2008 annual international conference of the Design History Society, ed. F. Hackne, J. Glynne, and V. Minto, 2-10. Presented at the 2008 annual international conference of the Design History Society. Falmouth: Universal Publications.
20. Lofland, J., D. Snow, L. Anderson, and L.H. Lofland. 2006. Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
21. Los, M. 2006. Looking into the future: Surveillance, globalization and the totalitarian potential. In Theorizing surveillance: The panopticon and beyond, ed. D. Lyon, 69-94. Devon: Willan Publishing.
22. Lyon, D. 2002. Everyday surveillance: Personal data and social classifications. Information, Communication & Society 5(2): 242-257. doi: 10.1080/13691180210130806.
23. Lyon, D. 2006. Why where you are matters: Mundane mobilities, transparent technologies, and digital discrimination. In Surveillance and security: Technological politics and power in everyday life, 209-224. New York/London: Routledge.
24. Manders-Huits, N., and M. Zimmer. 2009. Values and pragmatic action: The challenges of introducing ethical intelligence in technical and design communities. International Review of Information Ethics 10: 37-44.
25. Marx, G.T. 2002. What’s new about the “new surveillance”? Classifying for change and continuity. Surveillance & Society 1(1): 9-29.
26. Mun, M., S. Reddy, K. Shilton, N. Yau, P. Boda, J. Burke, D. Estrin, et al. 2009. PEIR, the personal environmental impact report, as a platform for participatory sensing systems research. In Proceedings of the international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services, 55-68. Presented at the international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services. Krakow: ACM.
27. Pinch, T.J., and W.E. Bijker. 1989. The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.
28. Rabinow, P., and G. Bennett. 2008. Ars Synthetica: Designs for human practice. Houston: Rice University Connexions. Web site. Retrieved from http://cnx.org/content/col10612/1.2/
29. Reddy, S., K. Shilton, J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, and M.B Srivastava. 2008. Evaluating participation and performance in participatory sensing. In UrbanSense workshop, SenSys 2008. Presented at the Sensys, Raleigh: ACM.
30. Schuler, D., and A. Namioka. 1993. Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Shilton, K. 2010. Participatory sensing: Building empowering surveillance. Surveillance & Society 8(2): 131-150.
32. Shilton, K. 2012. Values levers: Building ethics into design. Science, Technology & Human Values. doi: 10.1177/0162243912436985.
33. Shilton, K., J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, and M. Srivastava. 2008. Participatory privacy in urban sensing. Presented at the MODUS 2008, St. Louis, MO.
34. Shilton, K., J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, R. Govindan, and J. Kang. 2009. Designing the personal data stream: Enabling participatory privacy in mobile personal sensing. In The 37th research conference on communication, information and internet policy (TPRC). Presented at the 37th research conference on communication, information and internet policy (TPRC), Arlington, VA.
35. Star, S.L. 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43(3): 377-391.
36. Suchman, L. 1995. Making work visible. Communications of the ACM 38(9): 56-61.
37. Suchman, L. 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. van der Burg, S. 2009. Imagining the future of photoacoustic mammography. Science and Engineering Ethics 15(1): 97-110.