Agent-based middleware architecture for reconfigurable manufacturing systems

International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Volumn 92, Issue 5-8, 2017, Pages 1579-1590

  Priego, Rafael ^a   Iriondo, Nagore ^a   Gangoiti, Unai ^a   Marcos, Marga ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Control system availability; Dynamic reconfiguration; Middleware; Multi agent systems; Quality of service

Indexed keywords

AVAILABILITY; COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; CONTROL SYSTEMS; DYNAMIC MODELS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FAULT TOLERANCE; MANUFACTURE; MIDDLEWARE; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF SERVICE; RECONFIGURABLE ARCHITECTURES;

DISTRIBUTED AGENTS; DYNAMIC RE-CONFIGURATION; MIDDLEWARE ARCHITECTURE; MULTIAGENT ARCHITECTURE; PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATIONS; QUALITYOF-SERVICE REQUIREMENT (QOS); RECONFIGURABLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM; SYSTEM AVAILABILITY;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 85015259153     PISSN: 02683768     EISSN: 14333015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0154-z     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Innovation ERC (2013) Factories of the Future PPP: towards competitive EU manufacturing. European Union Publishing. http://ec.europa.eu/research/press/2013/pdf/ppp/fof_factsheet.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2016
2. Blanchet M, Rinn T, Von Thaden G, Thieulloy G (2014) Industry 4.0 The new industrial revolution How Europe will succeed. Roland Berger Publishing. https://www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/roland_berger_tab_industry_4_0_20140403.pdf. Accessed 29 Sept 2016
3. Council NST (2016) Advanced manufacturing: a snapshot of priority technology areas across the federal government subcommittee for advanced manufacturing. White House Publishing. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/images/Blog/NSTC%20SAM%20technology%20areas%20snapshot.pdf. Accessed 29 Sept 2016
4. Morenas J, Higuera AG, Alonso PG (2012) Product driven distributed control system for an experimental logistics centre. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Informatics and Control 8:7199–7216
5. Nouri H (2015) Development of a comprehensive model and BFO algorithm for a dynamic cellular manufacturing system. Appl Math Model 40:1514–1531. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2015.09.004
6. Pach C, Berger T, Sallez Y, Trentesaux D (2015) Reactive control of overall power consumption in flexible manufacturing systems scheduling: a potential fields model. Control Eng Pract 44:193–208. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2015.08.003
7. Lepuschitz W, Zoitl A, Vallée M, Merdan M (2011) Toward self-reconfiguration of manufacturing systems using automation agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C 41:52–69. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2059012
8. Legat C, Vogel-heuser B (2014) A multi-agent architecture for compensating unforeseen failures on field control level. Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing and Robotics 544:195–208. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04735-5
9. Botygin IA, Tartakovsky VA (2014) The development and simulation research of load balancing algorithm in network infrastructures. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Automation and Control Systems (MEACS), Tomsk. doi:10.1109/MEACS.2014.6986904
10. Binotto APD, Wehrmeister MA, Kuijper A, Pereira CE (2013) Sm@rtConfig: a context-aware runtime and tuning system using an aspect-oriented approach for data intensive engineering applications. Control Eng Pract 21:204–217. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2012.10.001
11. Guo L, Wang B, Wang W (2009) Research of energy-efficiency algorithm based on on-demand load balancing for wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Test and Measurement 2:22–26. doi:10.1109/ICTM.2009.5413071
12. Merz M, Frank T, Vogel-Heuser B (2012) Dynamic redeployment of control software in distributed industrial automation systems during runtime. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Seoul, pp 863–868. doi:10.1109/CoASE.2012.6386445
13. Streit A, Rösch S, Vogel-Heuser B (2014) Redeployment of control software during runtime for modular automation systems taking real-time and distributed I/O into consideration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 19th Conference on Emerging Technologies Factory Automation (ETFA). Barcelona. doi:10.1109/ETFA.2014.7005263
14. Priego R, Armentia A, Orive D, Marcos M (2013) Supervision-based reconfiguration of industrial control systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 18th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA). Cagliari. doi:10.1109/ETFA.2013.6648130
15. Priego R, Agirre A, Estévez E, Orive D, Marcos M (2015) Middleware-based support for reconfigurable mechatronic systems, 2nd conference on embedded systems. Computational Intelligence and Telematics in Control (CESCIT) 48:81–86. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.08.112
16. th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN). Cambridge, pp 1233–1238. doi:10.1109/INDIN.2015.7281911
17. Commission IE (2004) International Standard IEC 61499 Part 1. IEC Publishing. https://webstore.iec.ch/p-preview/info_iec61499-1%7Bed1.0%7Den.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2016
18. Commission IE (2013) International Standard IEC 61131-3, Programmable Logic Controllers Part 3. IEC Publishing. https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/4552. Accessed 28 Sept 2016
19. Olsen S, Wang J, Ramirez-Serrano A, Brennan RW (2005) Contingencies-based reconfiguration of distributed factory automation. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 21:379–390. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2004.11.011
20. Khalgui M, Mosbahi O (2010) Intelligent distributed control systems. Inf Softw Technol 52:1259–1271. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.06.001
21. Schimmel A, Zoitl A (2011) Distributed online change for IEC 61499. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 16th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA). Toulouse. doi:10.1109/ETFA.2011.6059117
22. Yan J, Vyatkin V (2013) Extension of reconfigurability provisions in IEC 61499. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 18th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA). Cagliari. doi:10.1109/ETFA.2013.6648026
23. Strasser T, Froschauer R (2012) Autonomous application recovery in distributed intelligent automation and control systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C 42:1054–1070. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2012.2185928
24. Wehrmeister MA, de Freitas EP, Binotto APD, Pereira CE (2014) Combining aspects and object-orientation in model-driven engineering for distributed industrial mechatronics systems. Mechatronics 24:844–865. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.12.008
25. Armentia A, Gangoiti U, Priego R, Estévez E, Marcos M (2015) Flexibility support for homecare applications based on models and multi-agent technology. Sensors 15:31939–31964. doi:10.3390/s151229899
26. Thramboulidis K (2005) Model integrated mechatronics—towards a new paradigm in the development of manufacturing systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 1:54–61
27. Lüder A, Estévez E, Hundt L, Marcos M (2010) Automatic transformation of logic models within engineering of embedded mechatronical units. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:1077–1089. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-3010-y
28. Bellifemine F, Poggi A, Rimassa G (2001) Developing multi-agent systems with a FIPA-compliant agent framework. Software - Practice and Experience 31:103–128
29. Bellifemine F, Caire G, Poggi A, Rimassa G (2008) JADE: a software framework for developing multi-agent applications. Lessons learned Information and Software Technology 50:10–21. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2007.10.008
30. FIPA (2015) Standard FIPA Specifications. FIPA Publishing. http://www.fipa.org/repository/standardspecs.html. Accessed 7 Sept 2015