Malignancy risk estimation of screen-detected nodules at baseline CT: comparison of the PanCan model, Lung-RADS and NCCN guidelines

European Radiology

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2017, Pages 4019-4029

  van Riel, Sarah J ^a   Ciompi, Francesco ^a   Jacobs, Colin ^a   Winkler Wille, Mathilde M ^b   Scholten, Ernst Th ^a   Naqibullah, Matiullah ^b   Lam, Stephen ^c   Prokop, Mathias ^a   Schaefer Prokop, Cornelia ^a,d   van Ginneken, Bram ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY   (Canada)

^d MEANDER MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computer tomography; Diagnostic imaging; Lung cancer screening; Risk; Solitary pulmonary nodule

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG CALCIFICATION; LUNG CANCER; LUNG NODULE; LUNG TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; TUMOR VOLUME; VOLUMETRY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; LUNG; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE PULMONARY NODULES; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RISK; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE PULMONARY NODULES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 85015246344     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4767-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cressman S, Lam S, Tammemagi MC et al (2014) Resource utilization and costs during the initial years of lung cancer screening with computed tomography in Canada. J Thorac Oncol 9(10):1449–1458
2. Pinsky PF, Gierada DS, Nath PH, Kazerooni E, Amorosa J (2013) National lung screening trial: variability in nodule detection rates in chest CT studies. Radiology 268(3):865–873
3. Singh S, Pinsky P, Fineberg NS et al (2011) Evaluation of reader variability in the interpretation of follow-up CT scans at lung cancer screening. Radiology 259(1):263–270
4. Lung-RADS Assessment Categories, Version 1.0. American College of Radiology. Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS™) Web site. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/LungRADS. Release date April 28, 2014. Accessed September 15, 2014
5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines, Version 1.2016, Lung Cancer Screening. Web site. Release date June 23, 2015. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#detection
6. McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR et al (2013) Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med 369(10):910–919
7. Winkler Wille MM, van Riel SJ, Saghir Z et al (2015) Predictive accuracy of the PanCan lung cancer risk prediction model - external validation based on CT from the Danish lung cancer screening trial. Eur Radiol 25(10):3093–3099
8. Wille MM, Dirksen A, Ashraf H et al (2016) Results of the randomized Danish lung cancer screening trial with focus on high-risk profiling. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193(5):542–551
9. Van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M et al (2009) Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 361(23):2221–2229
10. Tammemagi MC, Lam S (2014) Screening for lung cancer using low dose computed tomography. BMJ 348:g2253
11. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845
12. Horeweg N, van Rosmalen J, Heuvelmans MA et al (2014) Lancet Oncol 15(12):1332–1341
13. Lee HJ, Goo JM, Lee CH, Yoo CG, Kim YT, Im JG (2007) Nodular ground-glass opacities on thin-section CT: size change during follow-up and pathological results. Korean J Radiol 8(1):22–31
14. Lee JH, Park CM, Lee SM, Kim H, McAdams HP, Goo JM (2016) Persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules with solid portions of 5 mm or smaller: Their natural course and predictors of interval growth. Eur Radiol 26(6):1529–1537
15. van Riel SJ, Sanchez CI, Bankier AA et al (2015) Observer variability of classification of pulmonary nodules on low-dose CT imaging and its effect on nodule management. Radiology 277(3):863–871
16. Callister ME, Baldwin DR, Akram AR et al (2015) British thoracic society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax 70(Suppl 2):ii1–ii54
17. Gould MK, Donington J, Lynch WR et al (2013) Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143(5 Suppl):e93S–e120S
18. Baldwin DR (2015) Development of guidelines fort he management of pulmonary nodules: toward better implmentation. Chest 148(6):1365–1367
19. Perandini S, Soardi GA, Motton M, Critique of Al-Ameri MS et al (2015) Risk of malignancy in pulmonary nodules: A validation study of four prediction models. Lung Cancer 90(1):118–119
20. Yankelevitz DF, Yip R, Smith JP et al (2015) CT screening for lung cancer: nonsolid nodules in baseline and annual repeat rounds. Radiology 277(2):555–564