Internal/external: The state of sovereignty

Contemporary Politics

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 7-20

  Prokhovnik, Raia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015243345     PISSN: 13569775     EISSN: 14693631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13569779608454736     Document Type: Note

References (37)

1. Connolly, W., ed. 1984. Legitimacy and the State Oxford
2. 1993. Political Liberalism New York
3. Shute, S., and Hurley, S., eds. 1993. “ ‘The Law of Peoples’ ”. In On Human Rights New York
4. Nozick, R., 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia Oxford
5. MacCallum, G., 1991. “ ‘Negative and Positive Freedom’ ”. In Liberty Edited by: Miller, D., Oxford
6. 1991. Identity/Difference Ithaca
7. Malcolm, N., Sense on Sovereignty, 19916London: Centre for Policy Studies.
8. Hobbes, T., 1946. Leviathan Edited by: Oakeshott, M., Oxford
9. Walker, R. B. J., 1993. Inside/Outside. International Relations as Political Theory Cambridge
10. Nardin, T., and Mapel, D., 1992. Traditions of International Ethics Cambridge
11. Brown, C., 1992. International Relations Theory. New Normative Approaches New York
12. Bartelson, J., 1995. The Genealogy of Sovereignty Cambridge
13. 1994. “ ’Contemporary Crisis of the Nation State?’ ”. 3 No.42
14. Gatens, M., 1996. Imginary Bodies. Ethics, Power and Corporeality ixLondon
15. Weber, C., 1995. Simulating Sovereignty. Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange 2Cambridge
16. Biersteker, T., and Weber, C., 1996. “ ‘The Social Construction of State Sovereignty’ ”. In State Sovereignty as Social Construct Edited by: Biersteker, T., and Weber, C., 5Cambridge
17. Hirst, P., and Thompson, G., 1996. Globalisation in Question Cambridge
18. Malcolm. Sense on Sovereignty, 27
19. Walker. Inside/Outside, 181
20. Malcolm. Sense on Sovereignty, 15
21. Walker. Inside/Outside, 179
22. Linklater, A., 1992. ‘The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical Theoretical Point of View’. Millennium,: 77–98.
23. Sylvester, C., 1994. Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era Cambridge
24. Ashworth, G., ed. 1995. A Diplomacy of the Oppressed. New Directions in International Feminism London
25. Weber, C., 1994. ‘Good Girls, Little Girls and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane's Critique of Feminist International Relations’. Millennium.
26. Krause, J., 1994. “ ‘Inclusion/Exclusion: Political Theory, International Theory’ ”. In Contemporary Political Studies 1994 Edited by: Dunleavy, P., and Stanyer, J., Belfast
27. Hutchings, K., 1996. Kant, Critique and Politics London chapter 8
28. Hoffinan, J., 1996. “ ‘What on Earth have Sovereignty and the State to do with the Question of Gender?’ ”. In Contemporary Political Studies 1996 Edited by: Haropsher-Monk, I., and Stanyer, J., 631Belfast
29. Biersteker and Weber. State Sovereignty as Social Construct, 11
30. Walker. Inside/Outside, 174
31. Harding, A., 1994. ‘The Origins of the Concept of the State’. History of Political Thought,: 69–70.
32. Benn, S., 1955. ‘The Uses of “Sovereignty”’. Political Studies,: 122
33. Morganthau, H., 1964. “ ‘The intellectual and political functions ofa theory of international relations’ ”. In The Role of Theory in International Relations Edited by: Harrison, H. V., 116Princeton
34. Camilleri, J., and Falk, R., 1992. The End of Sovereignty. The Politics ofa Shrinking and Fragmenting World 39Aldershot
35. Walker, R., and Mendlovitz, S., 1990. Contending Sovereignties: Rethinking Political Community 2Boulder
36. James, A., 1986. Sovereign Statehood London
37. Harding. “ ‘The Origins of the Concept of the State’ ”. 58