Innovating transport with QUIC: Design approaches and research challenges

IEEE Internet Computing

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 72-76

  Cui, Yong ^a   Li, Tianxiang ^a   Liu, Cong ^a   Wang, Xingwei ^b   Kuhlewind, Mirja ^c  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

HTTP 2; IETF; Internet standards; Internet Web technologies; latency; multiplexing; QUIC; security and privacy; TCP; TLS

Indexed keywords

HYPERTEXT SYSTEMS; MULTIPLEXING; THALLIUM;

IETF; INTERNET STANDARD; LATENCY; QUIC; SECURITY AND PRIVACY;

HTTP;

EID: 85015236233     PISSN: 10897801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2017.44     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. T. Henderson et al., The NewReno Modification to TCP's Fast Recovery Algorithm, RFC 6582, 2012.
2. X. Rhee et al., CUBIC for Fast Long-Distance Networks, draft-ietf-tcpm-cubic-03, IETF Internet draft, 2 Dec. 2016; https://tools. ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-cubic-03.
3. P. Sarolahti, M. Kojo, and K. Raatikainen, "F-RTO: An Enhanced Recovery Algorithm for TCP Retransmission Timeouts," ACM Sigcomm Computer Comm. Rev., vol. 33, no. 2, 2003, pp. 51-63.
4. M. Allman et al., Early Retransmit for TCP and Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP), RFC 5827, 2010.
5. C. Cheng, RACK: A Time-Based Fast Loss Detection Algorithm for TCP, draft-cheng-tcpmrack-01, IETF Internet draft, 31 Oct. 2016; https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-01.
6. M. Mathis et al., TCP Selective Acknowledgment Options, RFC 2018, 1996; https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2018.
7. R. Hamilton et al., QUIC: A UDP-Based Secure and Reliable Transport for HTTP/2, hamilton-quic-transport-protocol-01, IETF Internet draft, 31 Oct. 2016; https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamilton-quic-transport-protocol-01.
8. J. Iyengar, et al., QUIC Loss Recovery and Congestion Control, draft-iyengar-quicloss-recovery-01, IETF Internet draft, 31 Oct. 2016; https://tools.ietf.org/html/draftiyengar-quic-loss-recovery-01.
9. M. Thomson et al., Using Transport Layer Security (TLS) to Secure QUIC, draftthomson-quic-tls-01, IETF Internet draft, 25 Oct. 2016; https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-quic-tls-01.
10. R. Shade et al., HTTP/2 Semantics Using the QUIC Transport Protocol, draft-shade-quichttp2-mapping-00, IETF Internet draft, 8 July 2016; https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shade-quic-http2-mapping-00.
11. M. Alizadeh et al., "Data Center TCP (DCTCP)," ACM Sigcomm Computer Comm. Rev., vol. 40, no. 4, 2010, pp. 63-74.
12. Y. Cui et al., "End-to-End Coding for TCP," IEEE Network, vol. 30, no. 2, 2016, pp. 68-73.
13. X.S. Wang et al., "How Speedy Is SPDY?" Proc. 11th Usenix Symp. Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 2014; www. usenix.org/system/files/conference/nsdi14/nsdi14-paper-wang-xiao-sophia.pdf.
14. R.C. Lychev et al., "How Secure and Quick Is QUIC? Provable Security and Performance Analyses," Proc. 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2015; https://csdl.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/sp/2015/6949/00/6949a214.pdf.
15. W.M. Petullo et al., "MinimaLT: Minimal-Latency Networking through Better Security," Proc. 2013 ACM SIGSAC Conf. Computer & Comm. Security, ACM, 2013; https://cr.yp.to/tcpip/minimalt-20130522.pdf.