Difficult airway research options and ethical consensus

Anaesthesia

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 541-542

  Grocott, H P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY; CADAVER; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONSENSUS; HUMAN; LETTER; MANIKIN; MEDICAL ETHICS; RESPIRATION CONTROL; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; SKILL; SOCIETY; MALE;

AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; CONSENSUS; HUMANS; MALE; MANIKINS;

EID: 85015156812     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.13849     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Ward PA, Irwin MG. Man vs. manikin revisited–the ethical boundaries of simulating difficult airways in patients. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 1399–403.
2. Oxford English dictionary. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/consensus (accessed 23/12/2016).
3. Kovacs G, Duggan LV, Brindley PG. Glottic impersonation. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2017; 64: 320.
4. Murphy LD, Kovacs GJ, Reardon PM, Law JA. Comparison of the King Vision videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Journal of Emergency Medicine 2014; 47: 239–46.