Deciding what is a controversial issue: A case study of social studies curriculum controversy

Theory and Research in Social Education

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 298-316

  Camicia, Steven P ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015133748     PISSN: 00933104     EISSN: 21631654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2008.10473378     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anyon, J. (1979). Ideology and U.S. history textbooks. Harvard Educational Review, 49, 361-386.
2. Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
3. Banks, J. A. (1996). The cannon debate, knowledge construction, and multicultural education. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Multicultural education, transformative knowledge, and action: Historical and contemporary perspectives (pp. 3-29). New York: Teacher College Press.
4. Binder, A. J. (2000). Why do some curricular challenges work while others do not? The case of three Afrocentric challenges. Sociology of Education, 73(2), 69-91.
5. Binder, A. J. (2002). Contentious curricula: Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Camicia, S. P. (2007). Teaching the Japanese American internment: A case study of social studies curriculum contention (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, 2007). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database. (Publication No. AAT 3275853).
7. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
8. Eisner, E. W. (2002). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd. ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Engle, S. H. (1960/1996). Decision making. In W. C. Parker (Ed.), Educating the democratic mind (pp. 117-125). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. (Original work published in 1960).
10. Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
11. Evans, R. W. (2004). The social studies wars: What should we teach the children? New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Evans, R. W. (2007). This happened in America: Harold Rugg and the censure of social studies. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
13. Foster, S. J. (2006). Whose history? Portrayal of immigrant groups in U.S. history textbooks, 1800-present. In S. J. Foster & K. A. Crawford (Eds.), What shall we tell the children? International perspectives on school history textbooks (pp. 155-178). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
14. Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
15. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
16. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.
17. Hahn, C. L. (1991). Controversial issues in social studies. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 470-480). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
18. Hertzberg, H. W. (1981). Social studies reform, 1880-1980. Boulder, CO: Social Science Education Consortium.
19. Hess, D. (2008). Controversial issues and democratic discourse. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 124-136). New York: Routledge.
20. Hess, D. (in press). Controversy in the classroom. London: Routledge.
21. Hunt, M. P, & Metcalf, L. E. (1968). Teaching high school social studies: Problems in reflective thinking and social understanding (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
22. Johnston, H. (1995). A methodology for frame analysis: From discourse to cognitive schemata. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 217-246). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
23. Johnston, H. (2002). Verification and proof in frame and discourse analysis. In B. Klan-dermans & S. Staggenborg (Eds.), Methods of social movement research (pp. 62-91). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
24. King, J. E. (2004). Culture-centered knowledge: Black studies, curriculum transformation, and social action. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 349-378). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25. Kliebard, H. M. (2004). The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893-1958 (3rd ed.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
26. Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't think like an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.
27. Loewen, J. W. (1996). Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong. New York: Simon and Schuster.
28. Malkin, M. (2004). In defense of internment: The case for "racial profiling'' in World War II and the war on terror. Washington, DC: Regnery.
29. Nash, G. B., Crabtree, C., & Dunn, R. E. (1997). History on trial: Culture wars and the teaching of the past. New York: A.A. Knopf.
30. Ochoa-Becker, A. S. (2007). Democratic education for social studies: An issues-centered decision making curriculum (2nd ed.). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
31. Parker, W. C. (2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York: Teacher's College Press.
32. Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P, & Taubman, P M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
33. Ross, W. (2006). The struggle for the social studies curriculum. In W. Ross (Ed.), The social studies curriculum: Purposes, problems, and possibilities (3rd Rev. ed., pp. 17-36). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
34. Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464-481.
35. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
36. Symcox, L. (2002). Whose history? The struggle for national standards in American classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
37. Tetreault, M. K. T. (1986). Integrating women's history: The case of United States history high school books. The History Teacher, 19(2), 211-262.
38. Thornton, S. J. (2005). Teaching social studies that matter: Curriculum for active learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
39. United States Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians. (1997). Personal justice denied: Report of the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians [Foreword by Tetsuden Kashima]. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press and the Civil Liberties Public Education Fund.
40. Willinsky, J. (1998). Learning to divide the world: Education at empire's end. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
41. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
42. Zimmerman, J. (2002). Whose America? Culture wars in the public schools. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.